1 / 16

The Power of Collaboration Promoting information literacy skills in a Primary ITE course

The Power of Collaboration Promoting information literacy skills in a Primary ITE course. Sarah Purcell Academic Liaison Librarian Rachel Barrell Course Leader, Primary ITE. Presented at. 24 th April 2014. https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/3114 /. A few facts and figures.

ursula-dean
Télécharger la présentation

The Power of Collaboration Promoting information literacy skills in a Primary ITE course

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Power of CollaborationPromoting information literacy skills in a Primary ITE course Sarah Purcell Academic Liaison Librarian Rachel Barrell Course Leader, Primary ITE Presented at 24th April 2014 https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/3114/

  2. A few facts and figures BA(Hons) Initial Teacher Education with QTS. 3 year full time programme – 360 students This course has been designed in partnership with local primary schools to meet the requirements for Initial Teacher Training and is intended for those who wish to train to teach all areas of the Primary Curriculum Two pathways – Early Years (3-7) and Later Years (5-11) Entry Requirements – 300 UCAS points, GCSE maths and English, 10 days recent experience in primary classroom, passed Professional Skills Tests (English and maths) http://www.worcester.ac.uk/discover/university-history.html

  3. It began with…. a meeting Summer 2010 External examiner feedback “However many students are unclear about the Harvard system in particular using inappropriate sources often cited from the internet and failing to follow conventions for direct and indirect quotes in text.” Mills, 2009 Student comments to staff Transition into HE Academic writing – referencing, sources, searching Sarah’s PG Cert L&T in HE (SEDA 3)

  4. The research title and objectives What is the impact of an information skills teaching programme on first-year students’ confidence in and development of these skills? To evaluate what support was needed by new students, in what preferred medium and to what level (transition); To examine whether this level of input from the librarian is sustainable, given their current role, and propose ideas for managing this. Problem Improve Intervention Evaluation/ Reflection

  5. ‘Further Reading’ – examples of IL models SCONUL 7 Pillars: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/researchlens.pdf A New Curriculum for Information Literacy (ANCIL) http://www.slideshare.net/seckerj/ifla2012final and http://newcurriculum.wordpress.com/

  6. Pre- and post- intervention surveys Start of Semester 1 Year 3: First year induction, then final year support with projects Little awareness of sources beyond books Unsure about referencing Year 1: A-Levels, Access to HE and everything in between Inadvertent plagiarism, essay writing skills Expectations and lack of confidence Start of Semester 2 Follow up surveys: 69 Y1 students and 13 teaching staff Level of agreement with range of statements to assess confidence (students) and role (staff) Qualitative feedback

  7. Emerging themes impact and timing role of academic staff and librarian collaboration and integration online learning and support gaps in the teaching http://www.slideshare.net/SAPurcell and https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/3114/

  8. Impact and timing (1) Overall – positive impact on student confidence “The teaching has definitely made a big difference because I didn’t have a clue about referencing before I came here and in lectures the lecturers concentrate on the subject content rather than how to actually write essays. The teaching definitely made a difference to my learning…” Teaching staff noted a positive difference in student work BUT… Assignment moderation meeting with librarian in attendance: students were including sources and referencing them, but not necessarily integrating a range of different academic sources.

  9. Impact and timing (2) “I learnt more about referencing from the second teaching input in February. I think this was because I had received feedback from my assignments which allowed me to ask Sarah more specific questions…I think this is a very difficult area to understand until the first assignments have been written.” “I thought the initial lessons with Sarah were informative, however I would have benefitted more had they not been in the initial weeks as there was so much information to take in…I think sessions closer to starting our initial assignment would have been more useful as it would have been fresher.” Keywords: optionality, point of need, overload, ‘learning by doing’

  10. Demystifying academic writing? Academic writing: the “written synthesis” which represents and connects sources and concepts in a coherent and critical manner (Boscolo et al. 2007: p.423). Essay writing requires content; it cannot be taught generically (Lupton 2008). Clear link between librarian role and academic role? Is a ‘study skills approach’ truly effective? (Barrie 2007; Haggis 2006; Lea & Street 1998)

  11. Collaboration and integration “[Reminder] sessions for staff? Sometimes students report that the feedback is not as consistent as they would like.” “Please could you run a session for the…research methods staff …so that we can support the students in their literature reviews.” “Perhaps … more input from tutors as some have different expectations to others.” [Student] Keywords: consistency, promotion, transition, communication Sustainability and knowledge-sharing? “[With] the right encouragement and help from [librarians]”, teaching staff might be better placed to “link those skills to purposeful information-seeking” (Pacey 1995: p.98).

  12. New research cycles and progress 2011-12 and 2012-13: Persevered with four-week programme – changed order of content to reflect searching process, and removed/absorbed the scary plagiarism session Increased input for years 2 and 3 External examiner feedback and student tracking- No of 1st Class Degrees (10/11 9%, 11/12 13%, 12/13 16%) August 2013: BERA/SAGE Practitioner Award • The aims of the award are: • To support and encourage excellence in the application of research in practice • To disseminate the results of practitioner research and practice • To help practitioners to improve the quality of their work by example.

  13. 2013-14: Powerful collaboration Bitesizeintroductions to LibGuides, Summonetc – within mandatory modules, across all years Formative tasks e.g. writing within modules, and assignment-related input – team teaching Office hours and appointments (librarian) Students more proactive, requesting specific input Working together to respond to common questions and problems – Working in Partnership (WiP); Primary Referencing Guide; marking grid (p.7)

  14. In summary: what did we learn? Add-on, front loaded, study skills-based sessions didn’t work for us (transferability issues) Point of need, relevance of input and consistency of support are crucial for ongoing development of students’ academic skills (‘information literacy’?) Team teaching and collaborative research can lead to happy accidents and strong working relationships We can work with the resources we’ve got…if we are willing to collaborate and share (sustainability) Encourage uptake of existing expertise across university (Visibility, promotion) Students will tell you where you can improve and do more…if you encourage this collaboration from the start

  15. References Barrie, S.C. (2007) A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education. 32 (4), 439-458. Boscolo, P., Arfé, B., & Quarisa, M. (2007) Improving the quality of students' academic writing: an intervention study. Studies in Higher Education. 32 (4), 419 – 438. Haggis, T. (2006) Pedagogies for diversity: retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education. [Online] 31 (5), 521-535. Lea, M.R. & Street, B.V. (1998) Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. [Online] 23 (2), 157-172. Lupton, M. (2008) Evidence, argument and social responsibility: first-year students’ experiences of information literacy when researching an essay. Higher Education Research & Development. 27 (4), 399-414. Norton, L. (2009) Action research in teaching & learning: a practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Abingdon, Routledge. Pacey, P. (1995) Teaching user education, learning information skills; or, Towards the self-explanatory library. The New Review of Academic Librarianship. 1, 95-103. Pecorari, D. (2013) Teaching to avoid plagiarism: how to promote good source use. Maidenhead, Open University Press. Vezzosi, M. (2006) Information literacy and action research: an overview and some reflections. New Library World. 107 (1226/1227), 286-301. Wrathall, K. (2012) Strategies for implementing A New Curriculum for Information Literacy. http://implementingancil.pbworks.com/w/file/55121848/Strategies for Implementing ANCIL in Non-Cambridge HEIs v3.pdf[NB: Uni of Worcester was one of the case studies, worth a look]

More Related