1 / 26

Carbonate coasts as complex systems: A Case Study from Andros Island, Bahamas

Coastal Sediments ‘03. Carbonate coasts as complex systems: A Case Study from Andros Island, Bahamas. Gene Rankey and Brigitte Vlaswinkel University of Miami. Thanks to sponsors: NASA, National Science Foundation, Petroleum Research Fund, Contributors to the Comparative Sedimentology Lab

urvi
Télécharger la présentation

Carbonate coasts as complex systems: A Case Study from Andros Island, Bahamas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coastal Sediments ‘03 Carbonate coasts as complex systems: A Case Study from Andros Island, Bahamas Gene Rankey and Brigitte Vlaswinkel University of Miami Thanks to sponsors: NASA, National Science Foundation, Petroleum Research Fund, Contributors to the Comparative Sedimentology Lab Center for Southeastern Tropical Advanced Remote Sensing (CSTARS)

  2. Purposes • Quantify and describe spatial patterns on a modern carbonate tidal flat • Explore for the presence of chaos • Highlight potential implications for interpretation of modern and ancient Earth surface systems Focus of talk: Using quantitative morphometrics to provide insights on sedimentary system

  3. Outline • Background • Geomorphology of the tidal flat • Systemic facies patterns • Network structure • Implications

  4. Study Locations Miami Andros Island

  5. Tidal Flat Subenvironments 1 km • carbonate • microtidal • humid • Readily discernable on remote sensing data TM bands 4,2,1

  6. Tidal Flat Subenvironments Algal marsh Channel Mangrove pond Beach ridge

  7. Outline • Background • Geomorphology of the tidal flat • Systemic facies patterns • Subfacies size • Network structure • Implications

  8. 1 km 1 km Thematic Map ‘Spectral Lithotopes’ TM bands 4,2,1 Remote Sensing Data Analysis Similar spectral signatures, NOT necessarily similar facies

  9. Interpretation Calibration:Ikonos data existing mapsfield observations 1 km …more than ‘just a pretty picture’ Thematic Map ‘Spectral Lithotopes’

  10. Composition - Patch Size Exceedance probability (E.P.) is the cumulative probability (P [Y ≥ x]) of a given patch of area Y having an area > x Rank/(n+1)

  11. Composition - Patch Size Exceedance probability (E.P.) is the cumulative probability (P [Y ≥ x]) of a given patch of area Y having an area > x Exceedance probability has a power-lawdependence on the size of patch  Data is scale invariant or statistically self-similar Spatial configuration (lacunarity) also scales w/power-law

  12. Composition - Patch size For all intertidal facies: • Data are statistically described by power laws • Patch sizes have fractal distribution Inflection suggests 2 different geomorphic processes ‘the spectrometer is not a geomorphologist’

  13. Outline • Background • Geomorphology of Bahamian tidal flat • Facies patterns • Creek network structure • Creek & network morphometrics • Temporal character/evolution • Implications

  14. Tidal Creek Networks • Creeks most dominant components wrt sediment distribution and overall morphology Focus: • Network attributes (composition & configuration) • Temporal dynamics – compare active and inactive networks - testing for divergence(chaos…maybe) Distribution?

  15. Active networks Stabilized networks Tidal Creek Networks 1 km

  16. Tidal Creek Networks Horton (1945) stream numbering – fluvial channel segments Order 1 Order 2 Order 3

  17. Tidal Creek Segments Segment length by network – exponential Suggests stochastic processes, change in ‘rules’ at a certain length scale

  18. Tidal Creek Network Structure Entropy: measure of network disorder rij = probability of transition from a creek of order i into one of order j. E = 0 indicates a perfectly ordered system (streams of order i flow only into streams of order i+1).

  19. Tidal Creek Network Structure E > 0 E = 0

  20. Einactive = 0.403 All active networks are more disordered than inactive Tidal Creek Network Structure Entropy: measure of network disorder Among active networks, entropy increases exponentially from north to south Presence of divergencethrough time …chaos (?)…

  21. Historical Changes 1943 2001 • Creeks extending headwards, new creeks forming • …Observations consistent with predictions based on analysis

  22. Tidal Creek Flow Structure Data from UM/MIT field trip, March 2003 Flood tide; ‘predictable’

  23. Summary Nature of ‘Predictability’ varies depending on scale • Subfacies size - power-law • Creek lengths - stochastic • Creek flow structure – ‘deterministic’ • Entropy of active networks > inactive networks: •  • tidal creek networks more elaborate and diverge

  24. Interpretation – Chaos? “Mix of randomness and order” Predicts non-linearity Geomorphic evidence? Shoreline jumps Stratigraphic record? (TBA)

  25. System Dynamics “Mix of randomness and order” Macro-scale: System Fractal Facies patterns Meso-scale: Compartments Tidal creeks Stochastic Micro-scale: Constituents Deterministic Grain transport Important questions: Interfaces, characteristics, spatio-temporal domains

  26. Take-Home Messages • Nature and domains of co-existing order and disorder • Divergent behavior (chaos) • Implications for predictability

More Related