1 / 34

Historical Linguistics (2) Noam Chomsky

Historical Linguistics (2) Noam Chomsky. Dr. Ansa Hameed. Previously…. History of Linguistics Structuralism: Ferdinand de Saussure. Today’s Lecture. Generative Linguistics Noam Chomsky Chomsky Ideas About Language Phrase Structure Grammar Transformational Generative Grammar

uta
Télécharger la présentation

Historical Linguistics (2) Noam Chomsky

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Historical Linguistics (2)Noam Chomsky Dr. AnsaHameed

  2. Previously…. • History of Linguistics • Structuralism: • Ferdinand de Saussure

  3. Today’s Lecture • Generative Linguistics • Noam Chomsky • Chomsky Ideas About Language • Phrase Structure Grammar • Transformational Generative Grammar • Chomsky theory of First Language Acquistion

  4. NoamChomsky: A New Paradigm in Modern Linguistics

  5. GENERATIVE LINGUISTICS • A school of thought within Linguistics. • Makes use of the ´Concept of Generative Grammar` • One great proponent of this concept is Avram Noam Chomsky • Book: “Syntactic Structures” (1957) • Famous for Transformational Generative Grammar.

  6. Chomsky’s Brief Life History • December 7, 1928: Chomsky was born. • He attended the University of Pennsylvania where he met Zellig Harris • 1949: He graduatedwith a BA. Histhesiswas about Modern Hebrew. He enteredgraduateschool. • 1951: He became one of the Society of Fellows at Harvard, from where he moved to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1955. • He has been repeatedlyjailed for politicalactivism. (Smith, 2004). • He has been influenced by  a large variety of thinkers, philosophers, politicians and linguists. • Many compare him to Bertrand Russel.

  7. About Chomsky • ‘‘He has shown that there is really only one human language: that the immense complexity of the innumerable languages we hear around us must be variations on a single theme. He has revolutionizedlinguistics, and in so doing has set a cat among the philosophical pigeons.” (Smith, 2004: 16).

  8. Chomsky’s Ideas about Language • Language Definition • A language is a set (finite/infinite) of sentences, each finite in length and constructed out of a finite set of elements • Language is a system represented in the mind/brain of a particular individual

  9. Chomsky’s Idea of Competence & Performance Language Competence vs Performance • Chomsky distinguishes between: • Competence: speaker‘s/ hearer‘s unconscious knowledge of language (about sounds, meanings, syntax) • Performance: actual use of language in concrete situations • Competence is mental reality and not directly observable whereas performance is observable

  10. Chomsky’s Ideas about Aims of Linguistics Aims of Linguistics • Chomsky summarized the major aims of linguistics as to know: • What constitutes language? • How is such knowledge acquired? • How is such knowledge put to use? • What are the physical mechanisms that serve as the material basis for this system of knowledge and for its use?

  11. Chomsky’s Ideas about Syntax Language is Structure- Dependent • A principle common to all languages: Syntax is more than meaning • Chomsky asserts that knowledge of language relies on the structural relationships in the sentence rather than on the sequence of words • Example: The man who is tall is John. Is the man who is tall John? *Is the man who tall is John?

  12. Syntax is more than meaning • Well-formed sentence without meaning: Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. • Syntax as well as meaning deprived of inner logic: Ideas furiously green colorless sleep.

  13. Chomsky’s Models of Grammar Models of Grammar Chomsky introduced three models of grammar: • Finite state Grammar (most basic and inadequate) • Phrase Structure Grammar • Transformational Generative Grammar (Extension of Phrase Structure Grammar)

  14. Phrase Structure Grammar • Rules for determining the structure of phrases • Generate a lot of sentences from a small number of rules. • The structure of a phrase will consist of one or more constituents in a certain order. • Constituent: • Some words seem to belong together: • {The crazy man}{is jumping off the bridge} • Groups of words that belong together are called constituents • The component that determines the properties of the constituent is the head, and the constituent can be referred to as a phrase: e.g. noun phrase

  15. Phrase Structure Grammar • Explanation: • V Det N V Det N V Det N run a marathon eat the food read the book • V Prep Det N V Prep Det N go to the store talk with a teacher V Det N Prep Det N take your sister to the library • “Verb phrases have a V, (sometimes) an NP, and (sometimes) a PP” • VP -> V (NP) (PP)

  16. Phrase Structure Grammar • The main phrase structure rules: 1.S  NP VP 2. NP  {Det N, Pro} 3. VP  V (NP) (PP) (Adv) 4. PP  P NP 5. AP  A (PP)

  17. Phrase Structure Grammar Phrase Structure Rules & tree diagrams • NP  (Det) N • PP  P NPThe boy in the yard The boy (NP) Det N PP Det N P NP Det N The boy yard The in the boy

  18. Phrase Structure Grammar Some Limitations with Phrase Structure Grammar • The rules are mostly context free. • The rules explain intra-sentence constituent elements (syntax) but not inter-sentence relations (Syntactic) • Ambiguous sentences cannot be explained • These problems were solved with transformational generative grammar

  19. Deep & Surface Structures (Before moving further)* Syntactic Relationships have two levels of representation: • Surface Structure (SS): derived (surface) representation of a Deep Structure • how the sentence is actually represented • Deep Structure (DS): represents syntactic relations (underlying representation)

  20. Deep & Surface Structures • The deep structure is an abstract level of structural organization in which all the elements determining structural interpretation are represented. • Sentences that have alternative interpretations • Sentences that have different surface forms but have the same underlying meaning. • SS can be derived from DS by transformations like passivization, forming of questions etc.

  21. Deep & Surface Structures • How superficially different sentences are closely related? • Charlie broke the window. • The window was broken by Charlie • Charlie who broke the window. • Was the window broken by Charlie? • Difference in their surface structure = difference in syntactic forms • BUT they have the same ‘deep’ or underlying structure

  22. Deep & Surface Structures • How superficially similar sentences are different? (multiple meanings) Annie whacked the man with an umbrella. • Same surface structure but different deep structure The boy saw the man with a telescope.

  23. Transformational Generative Grammar Transformational Generative Grammar has two aspects: • Transformational • Generative

  24. Transformational Grammar • Transformational is a method of stating how the structures of many languages can be generated or explained as the result of specific transformations applied to certain basic* structure. • Transformations • I helped John. (Active) • John was helped by me. (Passive) • He will come. (affirmative) • Will he come? (Interrogative)

  25. Transformational Grammar • Transformational Rules* • Prescriptive/ Normative Rules: • Avoid ending sentences with prepositions • The difference between ‘owing’ and ‘due to’ • Where to use ‘I’ or ‘me’ • Other traditional rules derived from other classical languages • Descriptive Rules: • Based on observations and inductive rules what happens in language (e.g. He makes... I make….) • Rewrite Rules: • This system deals with symbols. (use of symbols to represent sentence: Example, S NP+VP)

  26. Transformational Grammar • Interrogative Rules: • Rules to make question statements • (Example: I can read. (DS) / Can I read? (SS)) • Affix Switch Rules: • Changing form by moving affix • (Example: He is going. (DS) / Is he going? (SS)) • Do-Support Rules: • Use of Do, Does • (Example: He watches T.V. (DS) / Does he watch T.V? (SS)) • Negation Rules: • Making negative sentences • (Example: She likes movies. (DS) / She does not like movies. (SS)) • Passivation Rules: • Changing voice (active…passive) • (Example: I play Hockey. (DS) / Hockey is played by me. (SS))

  27. Generative Grammar • Formally, a generative grammar is defined as one that is fully explicit. It is a finite set of rules that can be applied to generateall those and only those sentences (often but not necessarily, infinite in number) that are grammatical in a given language (Chomsky) • Explicit means what are possible sentences of language • To say a grammar generates a sentence is technical which means grammar assigns a structural description to sentences* • “all and only”= all grammatical sentences and only grammatical sentences • Finite rules infinite number of well-formed sentences

  28. Generative Grammar Properties of Generative Grammar • It includes whatever is in phrase structure grammar and transformational grammar and further takes into account all possible syntactic structures • The grammar has finite number of rules but capable to produce infinite number of structures. In this way, productivity in language is covered.

  29. Chomsky against Behaviourism • In the late 1950s, Skinner constructed his cognitive learning model: behaviorism which correlates with the notion. Stimulus → response→ reinforcement and habit formation • According to Skinner, children learn the language by imitating and repeating and the mind is a blank slate at birth. • According to Chomsky, Children are biologically programmed for language and language develops in the child in just the same way that other biological functions develop.

  30. Chomsky theory of First Language Acquistion • “ We are designed to walk.. That we are taught to walk is impossible. And pretty much the same is true of language. Nobody is taught language. In fact you can’t prevent a child from learning it” • Chomsky 1994 • “We are born with a Language Acquisition Device (LAD) and access to Universal Grammar (UG)”

  31. Chomsky’s Idea of Universal Grammar Concept of Universal Grammar • the system of principles, conditions, and rules that are elements or properties of all human languages, … the essence of human language. (Chomsky, 1976) • All human beings share part of their knowledge of language that is universal grammar (existing as part of language Competence) • Speaker knows a set of • principles that apply to all languages, • parameters that vary within clearly defined limits from one language to another • UG is an attempt to integrate grammar, mind and language

  32. L. A. D • L.A.D is a function of the brain that is specifically for learning language. It is an innate biological function of human beings just like learning to walk. • L.A.D plays two roles in Chomskyan theory: • 1. It accounts for the striking similarities among human languages. • 2. It accounts for the speed, ease and regularity with which children learn their first language. • If the sequence order is the same in all children, it is then quite normal to speak about language universals.

  33. Recap • Generative Linguistics • Noam Chomsky • Chomsky Ideas About Language • Phrase Structure Grammar • Transformational Generative Grammar • Chomsky theory of First Language Acquistion

  34. References • Carnie, Andrew. Syntax- A Generative Introduction. 2002. • Falk, Julia. Linguistics and Language. 1978. • Ouhalla, Jamal. Introducing Transformational Grammar. 1999. • Parsad, Tarni. A Course in Linguistics. 2012. • Neil, S. (2004). Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. New York: CUP. • Yule, George. The Study of Language. 1996.

More Related