1 / 22

Learning objectives

Learning objectives. At the end of this lesson you will be able to: identify indicators for each aspect of the livelihood framework; understand the criteria for selecting and collecting livelihoods indicators;

uttara
Télécharger la présentation

Learning objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Learning objectives • At the end of this lesson you will be able to: • identify indicators for each aspect of the livelihood framework; • understand the criteria for selecting and collecting livelihoods indicators; • be aware of the skills and knowledge required to select, collect and interpret livelihood indicators.

  2. Introduction In order to analyze the livelihood status of a group it is necessary to choose and interpretindicators. Let’s see how...

  3. Aspects of livelihoods A livelihood group is “homogenous”: the main livelihood strategies will be similar amongst households. The mix of indicators should cover all aspects of livelihoods of a livelihood group: Vulnerability context Livelihoods resources or assets Policies, institutions and processes Livelihood strategies Livelihood outcomes or goals

  4. Aspects of livelihoods • Therefore, we should select indicators which reflect: • main risk and vulnerability; • key assets; • livelihood strategies; • key policies/institutions and processes which may impact livelihoods, • livelihood outcomes. Example

  5. Selecting livelihood indicators Information should not be collected on too many indicators, but mainly on key indicators. Indicators should be prioritised on the basis that they provide as much information about a livelihood as possible. Example Suppose the livelihood strategy of a population group is predominantly wage labour. Key information: wages, e.g. daily rates, seasonal fluctuations, relationship to labour availability.

  6. Selecting livelihood indicators It may not be worthwhile collecting data on: Practices not important for an understanding of food security. Strategies which only contribute a small amount towards food security. Phenomena which may have an impact on livelihoods and food security but there is no framework for determining what this impact might be.

  7. Selecting livelihood indicators • Livelihoods are influenced: • at community and household level, and • at macro-level (national and international). We should select indicators that allow to make linkages between micro and macro-levels. Example • Suppose land-holding is an important indicator for subsistence farmers. • Useful indicators could be: • information on land-holding size at household level, • ownership and inheritance practices at community level, • government taxation and land holding legislation at the macro level.

  8. Selecting livelihood indicators Indicators on livelihood strategies should reflect a sustainable element of livelihoods. Example • To be included in a set of livelihood indicators: • selling small livestock (which may be a sustainable part of a system) • NOT to be included: • taking out massive loans or selling off oxen (which is not a sustainable part of a system)

  9. Selecting livelihood indicators Ease of collecting indicator data varies considerably: difficult to collect easy to collect Data on price and wage. Terms of trade. Government devaluations. Data to be collected in conflict situations Data on wage rates from petty trading or on remittances

  10. Selecting livelihood indicators Information may need to be contextualised within normal seasonal variations. • It is important to collect data at key seasonal points. • Especially for indicators like: • prices, • migration and grazing patterns, • malnutrition, and • mortality.

  11. Selecting livelihood indicators Data on outcomes, e.g. stunting, anaemia and mortality, require carrying out surveys. • Consequences: • substantial investment of resources; • it may be difficult to collect data at the level of a livelihood zone.

  12. Selecting livelihood indicators • What is important for accuracy? • the experience of those conducting the assessment, and • means of triangulation. • To triangulate information means to compare information obtained fromdifferent sources. • Therefore, in some situations we should select indicators that can be collected from multiple sources.

  13. Selecting livelihood indicators Livelihoods assessment must employ participatory methods. In case this is not possible for all indicators:use a mixture of indicatorsthat allow participatory methods to be employed. • Common participatory methods include: • community meetings, • focal group discussions, • men’s and women’s groups discussions, • key informant interviews. • Tools include: • semi-structured interviews, • community mapping, • historical profiles, • ranking, case studies, • time lines, • seasonal calendars, etc.

  14. Selecting livelihood indicators How are indicators selected in a specific context? Example : Nias mountain people See pages 9-11in the Learner Notes to read a complete description of the situation. • Indicators selected for this livelihood group are: • Terms of trade between rubber and pig income and essential food and non-food purchases • Access/income from rice cultivation/share cropping • Access/income from labour in Nias town or Sumatra • Disease outbreaks amongst pigs/other livestock • Levels of stunting and anaemia amongst children

  15. Selecting livelihood indicators Why have these indicators been selected? 1. The mix of indicators covers most aspects of livelihoods, i.e. vulnerability, livelihood strategies, processes and outcomes. 2. They reflect sustainable livelihood strategies. 3. They provide the maximum amount of information on livelihood status. 4. They are generally easy to measure. 5. They can easily be incorporated into a framework to assess livelihood and food security status.

  16. Selecting livelihood indicators Group discussion Which indicators have been selected for the following situation? Artisanal fishers in Benin Full time sedentary fishers in Benin live without land in settled fishing communities on the seacoast, where sandy soil precludes agricultural activity and fishing is the main source of family income. See Learner Notes to read the complete description of the situation. You can also choose to read further and find out which livelihoods indicators can be selected, and/or start a discussion about it.

  17. Selecting livelihood indicators Group discussion Which indicators have been selected for the following situation? Pastoralists in southern Somalia Pastoralists in southern Somalia derive the majority of their food needs from the purchase of cereals, sugar, and oil. Milk and milk products from cattle comprise a significant additional food source. Income is mainly obtained from sale of livestock and livestock products. See pages 13-15 in the Learner Notes to read the complete description of the situation. You can also choose to read further and find out which livelihoods indicators can be selected, and/or start a discussion about it.

  18. Selecting livelihood indicators Group discussion Which indicators have been selected for the following situation? Agro-pastoralists in southern Somalia Agro-pastoralists in southern Somalia derive the majority of their food from their own crop production, livestock milk production and some purchase. See pages 15-16 in the Learner Notes to read the complete description of the situation. You can also choose to read further and find out which livelihoods indicators can be selected, and/or start a discussion about it.

  19. Interpreting livelihood indicators Group discussion How can indicator data be interpreted in the following situation? Farchana refugee camp in Chad Most refugees in this refugee camp originated from around Geneina town. Refugees arriving in Chad from villages within one or two days from the border brought assets with them from home, including animals, household utensils, basic furniture, food stocks and sometimes cash. See pages 17-19 in the Learner Notes to read the complete description of the situation, and to find out how indicators have been interpreted.

  20. Skills required What knowledge and skills are required for collecting, analysing and interpreting livelihood indicators? To understand the local livelihood strategies and to identify the appropriate sources of information. Prior and possibly local knowledge of a livelihood system To deal with political divisions and tensions at community and intra-community level. Awareness of political, social and gender issues Awareness of the potential relevance of policies, institutions and processes. To make linkages between the macro and micro-level. To collect information on market indicators. Specific skills See Annex I at the end of the Learner Notes for this lesson. You will find information about the skills that are required for collecting, analysing and interpreting livelihoods indicators.

  21. Summary • Ideally, the mix of indicators should cover all aspects of livelihoods of a livelihood group. • Key indicators should be selected which: • can be incorporated into the analytical framework; • allow linkages between micro and macro-levels; • reflect a sustainable element of livelihoods; • can be collected from multiple sources to allow triangulation, if needed; and • allow participatory methods to be employed. • Knowledge and skills required for collecting and interpreting livelihoods indicators include: • local knowledge of a livelihood system, • awareness of political, social and gender issues, • experience of market and analysis, and • ability to make links between macro and micro-level.

  22. If you want to know more... • Suggested references: • Corbett. J (1988): Famine and household coping strategies. World Development 16 (9) • Hastie (undated). Using indicators to monitor protective impact. Oxfam G.B. • Jaspars. S and Shoham. J (2002): A critical review of approaches to assessing and monitoring livelihoods in situations of chronic conflict and political instability. ODI Working Paper 191. • WFP (2005): Emergency Food Security Assessment Handbook • Young. H et al (2001): Food security assessment in emergencies: A livelihoods approach. ODI HPN Network Papers 36. ODI, London • Jaspars. S (2006): From food crisis to fair trade. Livelihoods analysis, protection and support in emergencies. ENN Special Supplement No 3 • Westley. K and Michalev. V (2002): The use of participatory methods for livelihood assessment in situations of political instability: A case study from Kosovo. ODI Working paper 190 • Narbeth. S and McLean. C (2003): Livelihoods and protection. Displacement and vulnerable communities in Kismaayo, southern Somalia. HPN Network paper No 44, December 2003 • Pain. A (2002): Understanding and monitoring livelihoods under conditions of chronic conflict: Lessons from Afghanistan. ODI working paper 187 • Boudreau.T and Coutts. P (2002): Food economy in situations of chronic political instability. ODI working paper 188 • WFP (2003): Key issues in emergency needs assessment. Volume 1: Report of the Technical Meeting. 28-30 October 2003, Rome, Italy. • Montania. A and Majid. N (2002): Conducive conditions: Livelihood interventions in southern Somalia. ODI working paper 193 • F. Pittaluga, E. Corcoran, and J. Senahoun:Poverty profiles of artisanal fishers: methods based on the SLA model.

More Related