1 / 29

Mary T. Murphy School Improvement Plan

Mary T. Murphy School Improvement Plan. School Improvement Process. Collaboration Data Analysis Commitment to Continuous Improvement. Goal I.

vala
Télécharger la présentation

Mary T. Murphy School Improvement Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mary T. Murphy School Improvement Plan

  2. School Improvement Process Collaboration Data Analysis Commitment to Continuous Improvement

  3. Goal I Students will improve in their ability to apply comprehension strategies while reading grade level text as measured by district assessments and the CMT.

  4. Goal II Students will improve in their ability to independently respond to grade level text orally and in writing as measured by district assessments and the CMT.

  5. Kindergarten The percentage of students that will successfully read and retell a grade level text will increase by 10% as measured by the DRA2. Desired Outcome - 54% in 2006-2007 to 64% in 2007-2008. Result - 62% at benchmark in June 2008.

  6. Grade1 The percentage of students that will independently comprehend grade level text will increase by 15% from fall to spring as measured by the DRA2. Desired Outcome - 43% in September 2007 to 58% in June 2008. Result - 63% of all 1st grade students were at or above benchmark in June 2008.

  7. Grade 2 The percentage of students that will independently apply comprehension strategies while reading grade level text will increase by 10 percent from fall to spring as measured by the DRA2. Desired Outcome - 60% in September 2007 to 70% in June 2008. Result - 77% of students at or above benchmark June 2008.

  8. Grade 3 The percentage of students that will independently respond to grade level text in writing increase by 10% as measured by the CMT. Desired Outcome - 56% in the 2006-2007 school year to 66% in the 2007-2008 school year. Result - 59% of students scored at or above goal on 2008 CMT.

  9. Grade 4 The percentage of students that will reach goal on the on the reading portion of the 4th grade CMT will increase 10% from the percentage at goal on last year’s 3rd grade CMT. Desired Outcome - 56% in grade 3 to 66% in grade 4. Result – 55% of students scored at or above goal on the 4th grade CMT. 57% of the students that were present in both grades 3 & 4 scored at or above goal. 45% scored at goal on the 4th grade mastery test in 2007 as compared to 55% in 2008.

  10. Results

  11. Reading Comprehension - CMT

  12. Goal III Students will improve in their ability to independently respond to mathematical application problems as measured by district assessments and the CMT.

  13. Mathematics Application Strand CMT

  14. Additional CMT Analysis

  15. Demographic Trends

  16. School Improvement Plan2008-2009 • Continuation of 2007-2008 School Improvement Plan • Implementation of Reading Workshop • Continued implementation of Investigations in grades k-3 and continued focus on communication and application

  17. Kindergarten Objective • The percentage of students at or above a level 4 on the DRA2 will increase by 10 percentage points • Desired Outcome – from 63% in June of 2008 to 73% in June 2009

  18. Grade 1 Objective • The percentage of students at or above benchmark on the DRA2 will increase by 15 percentage points from September to June, 52%- 67%.

  19. Grade 2 Objective • The percentage of students at or above benchmark on the DRA2 will increase by 12 percentage points from September to June, 63% - 75%.

  20. Grade 3 Objective • The percentage of students at or above benchmark on the DRA2 will increase by 9 percentage points from September to June, 77%-86%. • The percentage of students at or above goal on the reading portion of the CMT will increase by 11 percentage points form last year, 59%-70%.

  21. Grade 4 Objective • The percentage of students at or above benchmark on the DRA2 will increase by 15 percentage points from September to June, 58%-73%. • The percentage of students at or above goal on the reading portion of the CMT will increase by 10 percentage points from the grade 3 CMT, 59%-70%.

  22. Mathematics Objective • The percentage of students in grades 2-4 that will successfully communicate their solutions and reasoning to mathematical application problems will increase by 13 percentage points as measured by the CMT and district assessments. • 70% of all students in grades 2-4 will demonstrate proficiency on the end of the year district assessment. • 70% of students in grades 3&4 will reach goal on the math application strand of the CMT.

  23. Other Objectives • Continued implementation of RTI process • Collaboratively develop school/parent compact • Extended Day – Enrichment Program • Parent Information Nights • Mathematics • Literacy (Parent Literacy Course)

More Related