1 / 16

Chapter Twenty-Six

Chapter Twenty-Six. Organizing Persuasive Speeches. Chapter Twenty-Six. Table of Contents Factors to Consider in Choosing an Organizational Pattern A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches. Factors to consider: Arguments and Evidence. Organization can depend on the type of claim:

valora
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter Twenty-Six

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter Twenty-Six Organizing Persuasive Speeches

  2. Chapter Twenty-Six Table of Contents • Factors to Consider in Choosing an Organizational Pattern • A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches

  3. Factors to consider:Arguments and Evidence Organization can depend on the type of claim: • Claims of policy = problem-solution • Claims of value = comparative-advantage • Claims of fact = cause-effect or problem-cause

  4. Factors to consider:The Audience • Organization can depend on the target audience and their feelings toward the topic. • Refutation pattern = Hostile Audiences • Narrative pattern = Sympathetic Audiences

  5. Factors to consider:The speech purpose • The type and degree of change you seek, also known as the speech purpose, can determine the organizational pattern.

  6. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Problem-Solution Pattern • Problem-Solution Pattern: first demonstrate the nature and significance of the problem and then provide justification for a proposed solution.

  7. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Problem-Cause-Solution Pattern • Problem-Cause-Solution Pattern: first demonstrate the nature of the problem, reasons for the problem, unsatisfactory solutions, and a proposed solution.

  8. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Monroe’s Motivated Sequence • Developed by Alan Monroe, Monroe’sMotivated Sequence provides an organizational pattern for planning and presenting persuasive speeches.

  9. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Monroe’s Motivated Sequence • Step 1: Attention • Step 2: Need • Step 3: Satisfaction • Step 4: Visualization • Step 5: Action

  10. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Monroe’s Motivated Sequence:Step 1: Attention • A persuasive speech should begin by getting the audience’s attention. • Address core concerns of the audience.

  11. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Monroe’s Motivated Sequence:Step 2: Need • The need step isolates and describes the issue. • Give the audience a reason to listen to your propositions.

  12. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Monroe’s Motivated Sequence:Step 3: Satisfaction • The satisfaction step identifies the solution. • Offer the audience a proposal to reinforce or change their attitudes, beliefs, and values regarding the need at hand.

  13. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Monroe’s Motivated Sequence:Step 4: Visualization • The visualization step carries the audience from accepting the feasibility of your proposal to seeing how it will actually benefit them. • Invoke the needs of self-esteem and self-actualization.

  14. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Monroe’s Motivated Sequence:Step 5: Action • The action step involves making a direct request of the audience to act.

  15. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Comparative-Advantage Pattern • Comparative-Advantage Pattern: organized by favorably comparing your position to the alternatives.

  16. A Plan for Organizing Persuasive Speeches:Refutation Pattern • Refutation Pattern: address each main point and then refute it.

More Related