Chapter 15 The Nation Breaking Apart 1846-1861 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

chapter 15 the nation breaking apart 1846 1861 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Chapter 15 The Nation Breaking Apart 1846-1861 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Chapter 15 The Nation Breaking Apart 1846-1861

play fullscreen
1 / 64
Chapter 15 The Nation Breaking Apart 1846-1861
402 Views
Download Presentation
van
Download Presentation

Chapter 15 The Nation Breaking Apart 1846-1861

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 15 The Nation Breaking Apart 1846-1861

  2. Section 1 - Growing Tensions Between North and South Find Out: • How the abolitionist movement heightened tensions between the North and South • The controversies over slavery in the territories • How the Wilmot Proviso and potential statehood for California deepened regional divisions • Analyze the Compromise of 1850

  3. THE DIVISIVE POLITICS OF SLAVERY • Over the centuries, the Northern and Southern sections of the United States had developed into two very different cultural and economic regions • There were also differences in geography and climate, as well as religious differences

  4. THE SOUTH BEFORE THE WAR • Rural plantation economy • Relied on slave labor • “Peculiar Institution” created tension • Southerners feared that the loss of slavery would mean loss of culture James Hopkinson's Plantation. Planting sweet potatoes. Library of Congress

  5. THE NORTH BEFORE THE WAR • The North had a more diverse economy • Industry flourished • Openly opposed slavery in the South and the new territories • More urbanized than South BOSTON HARBOR

  6. Antislavery and racism • Antislavery movement gained strength in North since 1830’s • Abolitionists felt slavery was unjust and should immediately be abolished (North) • Northern workers and immigrants feared slavery as an economic threat (WHY?) • Most Northerners were racist even if they opposed slavery (How?) • Southerners said slavery helped slaves (How?)

  7. SLAVERY IN THE TERRITORIES • The issue of whether slavery in California and the West would be legal led to heated debates in Congress • Gold rush led to application for statehood for California

  8. David Wilmot was a representative from the state of Pennsylvania. He proposed that slavery should not be allowed in any territory won in the War with Mexico. Angry slaveholders protested that the government had no right to tell them what to do with their own property since slaves were considered property. The measure passed the House but failed in the Senate. – Library of Congress Prints and Photographs The Wilmot Proviso

  9. The Wilmot Proviso • Proposed by Penn. Rep. David Wilmot • Most disagreements settled with Compromise of 1820 • New land won from Mexico caused tension over spread of slavery for many Northerners • Wilmot proposed to outlaw the spread of slavery in any territory won from War with Mexico • Southerners argued that slaves were property

  10. The Wilmot Proviso cont. • Slave holders said the gov’t couldn’t prevent them from taking property anywhere they wanted • Said Wilmot Proviso would be unconstitutional • Divided Congress along regional lines • Passed in House of Reps but not in Senate • (Wilmot’s Proviso) Led to creation of Free Soil Party to stop expansion of slavery • Made slavery a national issue

  11. Controversy over Territories • 1848 Nation debates what to do with land won from Mexico • Addition of new states threatened balance of power between Northern and Southern states • Gold discovered in California would soon cause it to apply for statehood as its population grew • Most in California wanted to be a free state and applied in 1850 • Balance of power between slave and free states would be upset

  12. COMPROMISE OF 1850 • Southerners threatened secession over issue • Henry Clay again worked a Compromise • For the North: California would be admitted as free state • For the South: A more effective fugitive slave law • Residents of New Mexico & Utah would vote themselves CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE The United States Senate, A.D. 1850 – Library of Congress Prints and Photographs

  13. Compromise of 1850 • Proposed by Henry Clay (The Great Compromiser) • California admitted as a free state • Slave trade ended in Washington, D.C. • Congress would pass no laws regarding slavery for the rest of the territories won from Mexico • Stronger fugitive slave laws passed Henry Clay, known as the Great Compromiser for coming up with the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Years and years in the Senate can surely age a man! Henry Clay – Library of Congress Prints and Photographs

  14. Compromise of 1850 cont. • Northerners now feel they are part of slavery because of fugitive slave law • Daniel Webster supports measure for good of country • Bill pushed through by Stephen Douglas of Illinois • Many felt the Union was saved Daniel Webster supported the Compromise of 1850 for the good of the country. Stephen Douglas helped his friend Henry Clay by pushing the bill through Congress. Notes and images from Library of Congress Prints and Photographs

  15. UNDERGROUND RAILROAD • Escape from slavery was dangerous and meant traveling on foot at night • As time went on, African Americans and white abolitionists developed a secret network of people who would hide fugitive slaves • ”Conductors” would hide runaways in tunnels and even cupboards

  16. HARRIET TUBMAN • One of the most famous conductors was Harriet Tubman • Tubman escaped slavery and vowed to help others do the same • She made 19 trips back to South and freed over 300 slaves (Including her own parents) HARRIET TUBMAN 1820-1913

  17. Comparing and Contrasting Use the chart below to take notes on the differences between the North and the South

  18. B. Summarizing Use the chart below to take note on the Compromise of 1850.

  19. Section 2 - The Crisis Deepens Find Out: • How the Fugitive Slave Act and Uncle Tom’s Cabin affected Northerners • The concept of popular sovereignty • The violence in “Bleeding Kansas” • The attack on Senator Sumner in the Senate

  20. FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT • Under the law, runaway slaves were not entitled to a trial by jury • Anyone helping a slave escape was jailed for 6 months and fined $1,000 • Northerners were upset by the harshness of the new law and often helped hide fugitive slaves Effects of the Fugitive Slave Law – Library of Congress Prints and Photographs

  21. The Fugitive Slave Act • Federal Commissioner ruled on each case • Received $5 for releasing defendant • Received $10 to return to slaveholder What do you think happened?

  22. The Fugitive Slave Act cont. • Southerners felt FSA was justified because slaves were considered property • Northerners resented law because it made them part of the slavery system by requiring them to capture runaway slaves • It placed fines on people who wouldn’t cooperate and jail terms on those who helped slaves escape • Northerners faced a moral choice a. Obey law and support slavery b. Disobey law and oppose slavery Question: How could a northerner break the law under the Fugitive Slave Act?

  23. UNCLE TOM’S CABIN In 1852, Harriet Beecher Stowe published her influential novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin The book stressed the moralevil ofslavery Southerners protested that it did not portray slavery accurately Abolitionist protests increased Instant best seller sold 500,000 by 1857 Eliza Pursued by Bloodhounds from the Library of Congress Prints and Photographs

  24. TENSION BUILDS IN KANSAS After Stephen Douglas worked to pass the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, Kansas would vote to decide on whether slavery would be legal or outlawed This contradicted the 36° 30” of the Missouri Compromise vs.

  25. The Kansas-Nebraska Act • Proposed by Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois to divide up Nebraska Territory into Kansas and Nebraska • Let people decide through popular sovereignty whether or not to allow slavery (Why did he do this?) • Would end Missouri Compromise • Turned Kansas into a bloody battleground

  26. BLEEDING KANSAS • The race for Kansas was on. . .both supporters and opponents attempted to populate Kansas to win the vote over slavery • As the election neared, a group of pro-slavery “border ruffians” from Missouri attempted to cross into Kansas • Violence erupted – Bleeding Kansas is the legacy Finally, after years of fighting, Kansas is admitted as a free state in 1861

  27. More Bleeding Kansas • Election for government held in 1855 • More proslavery than antislavery • 5000 proslavery Missourian’s voted illegally to swing vote for proslavery • Proslavery government won • Antislavery forces elected own government • Both sides armed themselves • “Sack of Lawrence” in May of 1855

  28. Ruins of the Free-State Hotel in Lawrence in 1856 as sketched in Sara T. D. Robinson's book, Kansas; Its Interior and Exterior Life. The hotel was destroyed by Proslavery men led by Sheriff Samuel J. Jones, who were acting without authorization. Both the New England Emigrant Aid Company and its assignee, the University of Kansas, several times tried unsuccessfully to collect damages from the federal government.

  29. Violence in Congress • Charles Sumner from Massachusetts delivered a speech in the Senate attacking proslavery forces in Kansas • Insulted Sen. A.P. Butler of S.C. • Preston Brooks, Butler’s nephew, attacked Sumner on the Senate floor with his cane, hitting him about 30 times and breaking the cane

  30. Charles Sumner of Massachusetts delivered a blistering speech in the Senate attacking the spread of slavery into Kansas. In his speech he attacked fellow Senators Douglas of Illinois and Butler of South Carolina. It took Sumner three years to regain his health enough to return to the Senate. Hon. Charles Sumner - the great senator and statesman, the champion of civil and political equality - born January 6th 1811, died March 11th 1874 from Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Preston Brooks was the nephew of A.P. Butler who was singled out by Sumner in his speech. Brooks was never charged with a crime but resigned his seat in the House after surviving a censure vote. He was soon reelected to fill his own vacancy.

  31. John Brown • Avenged the Sack of Lawrence • With 7 other men he murdered 5 proslavery neighbors while they slept in their beds • Known as the Pottawatomie Massacre after creek where victims bodies were found • Civil war broke out in Kansas for 3 more years

  32. John Brown believed that God commanded him to rid slavery from the United States. After leading raids in Kansas with 5 of his sons, he moved to Virginia to plan an attack that would free all the slaves. Brown was wounded and captured and later hanged for treason on December 2, 1859 for his role in trying to capture the American fort at Harpers Ferry - from Library of Congress Prints and Photographs. John Brown, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly right

  33. Recognizing Effects Take notes on the Compromise of 1850. Effect California is admitted as a free state which changed the balance between the number of slave and free states Effect The Fugitive Slave Act brought the issue of slavery to Northerners. They resented being involved in the slavery issue. Compromise of 1850 Effect Residents in western territories will decide by vote whether to allow slavery or not

  34. B. Evaluating Use the chart below to evaluate the role of these people and ideas in raising tensions over the issue of slavery in the1850’s.

  35. Section 3 - Slavery Dominates Politics Find Out: • Why the Republican Party was formed • The effects of the Dred Scott case • The Lincoln-Douglas Debates • The impact of John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry

  36. NEW POLITICAL PARTIES EMERGE • The political landscape by 1856 was very different than it had been just a few years earlier • Gone was the Whig Party • The Democrats were still alive but faced increasing challenge from new parties • An alternative was the Know-Nothing Party Know-Nothing members answered questions by saying, “I know Nothing”

  37. THE FREE-SOILERS Another party that emerged in the mid-19th century was the Free-Soilers They were northerners who opposed slavery in the territories Free-Soilers objections to slavery were based on economics not moral objection to slavery They believed slavery drove down wages for white workers “Soil”

  38. REPUBLICANS EMERGE AS LEADING PARTY • In 1854, opponents of slavery in the territories formed a new political party, the Republican Party • As the party grew it took on Free-Soilers, some anti-slavery Democrats and Whigs, and Know-Nothings Republicans won all but 3 presidential elections from 1860-1932

  39. "A Paradox“ from the Library of Congress The Republicans and Democrats fight over the foreign vote

  40. The Republican Party Forms • Grew from split in the Whig Party over the Kansas-Nebraska Act • Southern whigs were destroyed • Northern whigs joined with other opponents of slavery and formed the Republican Party • Ran John C. Frémont for President in 1856

  41. song Campaign poster from 1856 election from Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Song for the people from the Library of Congress

  42. The Election of 1856 • Democrats nominate James Buchanan from Pennsylvania • Buchanan was minister to Great Britain and out of the country since 1853 • Said little about slavery and claimed his goal was to maintain the Union • Frémont ran in the North for the Republicans-not on Southern ballot • Former President Millard Fillmore ran in South • Buchanan won but Frèmont won 11 states for Republicans

  43. THE DRED SCOTT DECISION • A major Supreme Court decision occurred when slave Dred Scott was taken by his owner to free states Illinois & Wisconsin • Scott argued that that made him a free man • Finally in 1857, the Supreme Court (Chief Justice Taney) ruled against Dred Scott citing the Constitution’s protection of property • The decision increased tensions over slavery • Northerners are angry because it made slavery legal everywhere in US DRED SCOTT LOST HIS CHANCE AT FREEDOM – From Library of Congress Prints and Photographs

  44. Dred Scott and his wife sued for their freedom because they had lived for 9 years in free territory. The decision had more to do with property rights than whether they deserved their freedom. From Library of Congress Prints and Photographs