1 / 13

Evaluation of the Economic Development Operative Programme

Evaluation of the Economic Development Operative Programme. Scheme 2.1.1 and mirror schemes. Agenda. Introduction of the scheme Amendments to the scheme Progress and allocation of funds Characteristics of the projects Questionnaire Key conclusions and recommendations.

vance
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation of the Economic Development Operative Programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of the Economic Development Operative Programme Scheme 2.1.1 and mirror schemes

  2. Agenda Introduction of the scheme Amendments to the scheme Progress and allocation of funds Characteristics of the projects Questionnaire Key conclusions and recommendations

  3. 1. Introduction of the scheme (1) Number of applications granted NSRF 54.4 th. (100%) EDOP and CHOP 1. 28.2 th. (51.8%) EDOP 2. and CHOP 1.2 23.8 th. (43.7%) EDOP 2.1.1 and mirrors 19.1 th. (35.1%) Source: EMIR (25.02.2013) • n, hogy hány NSRK pályázat összesen – hány 2.1.1; hány sikeres pályázat összesen – hány 2.1.1.

  4. 1. Introduction of the scheme (2) Number of supported projects (total: 19,236) Amount of commitments (total: HUF 265.5 Bill.) Source: EMIR (25.02.2013) *Available only in EDOP (Different in the CHOP mirror schemes)

  5. 2. Amendments to the scheme • The initial callsof the scheme primarily focused on enterprises with growth potential and their needs • The economic crisis influenced the original planning in many aspects; widening the circle of potential applicants and easing beneficiary obligations • The combined micro credit product introduced in 2011 was able to commit significant amount of funds

  6. 3. Progress and allocation of funds (1) Prognosis for the 2.1.1-A, B , C and M components (contracted grants) Source: EMIR (25.02.2013) I

  7. 3. Progress and allocation of funds (2) Distribution of granted funds by project progress Average rate of final payment at different progress phases* * EDOP 2.1.1 scheme Source: EMIR (25.02.2013)

  8. 3. Progress and allocation of funds (3) Reimbursed and non-reimbursed grants Source: EMIR (25.02.2013)

  9. 4. Characteristics of the projects Distribution of commitments among industry sectors Distribution of commitments among regions Source: EMIR (25.02.2013)

  10. 5. Questionnaire (1) In which phases did you involve consultants? • The online questionnaire was sent to 11.5 thousands beneficiaries • 1.8 thousand answers arrived, which means 15.4% rate of response

  11. 5. Questionnaire (2) Monitoring responsibilities – To what extent do you agree with the statements below?

  12. 6. Key conclusions and recommendations • In its present form direct funding for SMEs has a high absorption capability, there is no danger of losing funds • The parallel tasks of closing the present and launching the upcoming period present an enormous challenge for the institutional system • The balance between absorption and strategic objectives should be established while planning the 2014-2020 period: focusing on the modernisation of growth-supporting technology • Due to the characteristics of the scheme it is not recommended defining workforce conditions as a beneficiary obligation

More Related