1 / 9

Jim Skinner

Test area notebook Libya Montes – Syrtis Major – Isidis Planitia – Hesperia Planum – Utopia Planitia HLB. Jim Skinner. Utopia HLB. Isidis Planitia. Syrtis Major. Amenthes Planum. Terra Tyrrhena. Isidis Planitia. 5,000,000. 20,000,000. Previous regional units. I-1802:

vanida
Télécharger la présentation

Jim Skinner

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Test area notebookLibya Montes – Syrtis Major – Isidis Planitia – Hesperia Planum – Utopia Planitia HLB Jim Skinner

  2. Utopia HLB Isidis Planitia Syrtis Major Amenthes Planum Terra Tyrrhena

  3. Isidis Planitia 5,000,000 20,000,000

  4. Previous regional units • I-1802: • Syrtis Major (Hs), Isidis Planitia (Aps, Hvr), Terra Tyrrhena (Npld, Hpl3, Hr, Nplh), Hesperia Planum (Hr “type locality”), AHt), Utopia HLB (Hr, AHpe, HNu), Libya Montes (Nplh, Hpl3, Nm) • SIM 2888: • Syrtis Major (HIs), Isidis Planitia (AIi), Terra Tyrrhena (Nl, Nn, HNn), Utopia HLB (HNn, HBu1, HIa) Libya Montes (Nl)

  5. Critical issues in preliminary mapping of Skinner region • Differentiate marginal unit and/or group marginal unit with Isidis unit? • Continue splitting “boundary plains”  Utopia Planitia 1 and 2 units? • How to define Libya Montes unit? And, should we separate all major basin rim materials? • How to separate highland rocks? • Amenthes Planum – true “ridged plains”?

  6. Suggested units for test area • ABvi – basically same as Tanaka et al. (2005) and Scott et al. (1986-87) • ABvm – combines marginal unit and Isidis unit of Tanaka et al.(2005) • HBu1 – same as Tanaka et al. (2005) • HBu2 – same as Tanaka et al. (2005) • HNn – Nepenthes Mensae – requires better definition and criteria than defined in Tanaka et al. (2005) • Nml – partly equivalent to Tanaka et al. (2005)  More expansive, including rugged areas, generally free of long channel branches; partly defined by structures (normal faults); slopes grade into Noachis unit • Nmu – NEW - Montane undivided, partly equivalent to Nm and m of VO-based maps; mapped where Libya grades southward to Hellas rim; difficult to discriminate, but there is hope • Nn1 - Roughly equivalent to Tanaka et al. (2005) • Nn2 - NEW – Old smooth plains and crater infill; may be equivalent in age to Nn3 • Nn3 - NEW – Noachis 3 – Old Nplr and Hr

  7. Morphology • Channel mapping – effective with THEMIS at 50 to 60% transparency over MOLA hillshade • Still shows structure apparent in MOLA as well as thermal contrasts for channel mapping • Digitizing at 2,500,000 scale – appears optimal at global scale – better than 1:5M for placement accuracy • Channel id helps to define unit margins in broad swaths of highland terrain • Care needed to determine whether channel truncated through burial or change in subsurface rheology • Important to show, where possible, convergence of stream branches not consistently represented in VO maps • If no convergences, show flow direction? Abrupt truncation?

  8. Structure • Major topographic scarps – dominate the circum-Isidis region • Amenthes Fossae form sets of linear depressions, no apparent offset, appear roughly circumferential to Isidis • Nili Fossae • Volcanic crater and scarps of Syrtis Major • Major wrinkle ridges on Syrtis Major • Syrtis is good unit to delineate superposition relationships with due to overlap and infill of crater highland terrains and protrusion of older Libya/Noachis-type units

  9. Low-lying flat regions “palus”

More Related