310 likes | 673 Vues
Competency to be gained from this lecture. Identify the use of observations and in depth interviews in public health . Key elements . ObservationsIn-depth interviews Practical aspects of key informant interviews . Observations . The oldest, most basic source of human knowledgeRange:Casual und
E N D
1. Observations and in-depth interviews India FETP
2. Competency to be gained from this lecture Identify the use of observations and in depth interviews in public health
3. Key elements Observations
In-depth interviews
Practical aspects of key informant interviews
4. Observations The oldest, most basic source of human knowledge
Range:
Casual understanding of the every day's world
Systematic tool of social sciences
Brings the researcher in direct interaction with people and their activities
Requires getting close to make people feel comfortable
5. Perspectives in observation Outsiders perspective
Maintain distance
View events from the observers perspective
Insiders perspective
Reduce distance by joining activities and interacting with people
View events from participants eyes and ears
Somewhere in between
Emphatic neutrality
6. Limitations of observation Occurrence of selective perception
The eyes do not see what the mind does not know
Requires:
Training
Difficult as people may perceive themselves as natural observers
Preparation
Concentration
7. Types of interviews Structured
Structured questionnaire
Mostly close-ended answers
Semi-structured
Fixed questions
Open answers
In-depth
Questions are based upon the responses collected
8. Methodological challenges for in-depth interviews Most researchers in community based health areas have much experience in structured, quantitative survey interviewing
Developing the skills for unstructured interviewing often requires unlearning elements deeply instilled in survey interviewing
9. Objectives of in-depth interviews Discover the interviewees own framework of meanings
Obtains rich, contextualized, in-depth information
Avoid imposing the researchers structures and assumptions
Avoid being directive
10. Directiveness scale for interview technique Making encouraging noises
Reflecting on remarks made by the informant
Probing on the last remark by the informant
Probing an idea preceding the last remark by the informant
Probing an idea expressed earlier in the interview
Introducing a new topic
11. The questionnaire List of core questions
Topics
Variations
Order
Terminology
Adapt to the terminology of the respondent
Additional questions may be introduced
12. Types of questions for in-depth interviews Behaviour / experience
Opinion or belief
Feelings
Knowledge
Sensory
Background / demography
13. Qualities of questions in in-depth interviews Open ended
Neutral
Sensitive
Clear to the interviewee
14. Keeping control of the interview Knowing what needs to be found
Asking the right questions
Giving appropriate verbal and non verbal feedback
15. Common pitfalls in interviews Counseling
Presenting the perspective of the interviewer
Superficial interview
Receiving secret information
Inaccurate translation Interruptions
Competing distractions
Stage fright
Embarrassing questions
Jumping from a subject to another
Teaching
16. Recording interviews Notes during the interview
Distracting
Notes after the interview
Potential for missing information
Tape recording
Labour intensive
1 hour interview: 6 hours transcription
17. Use multiple interviews to cross verify and address limitations of key informants Are not infallible
May be reluctant to admit they dont know
May want to satisfy the researcher
May have their own biased interpretation
18. Perception of the key informant researcher relation by the community Community members may perceive that interaction as close
Close interactions with key informants may have an impact on acceptance with the wider group
19. Practical aspects of key informants interviews Number of interviews
Status of informant
Recording of information
Use of exact words
Dynamic of the interview
Leading role of the informant
Prepared questions
Sequential interviews
Probing
Relationship
20. 1. Number of interviews Interview each informant more than once
Allow a social relationship to develop
21. 2. Status of the informant Regard the informant as an expert who imparts important information to the interviewer
Act the part of someone interested in learning from the informant
22. 3. Recording information Learn from the informant
Record as much as possible of the information presented by the informant
Recording is part of the demonstration that the data from the expert are important
23. 4. Use of exact words Seek to get key portions of the testimony in the informants exact words
Use words, phrases and whole sentences
24. 5. Dynamic of the interview Avoid relying on asking a series of focused questions
Try to get the informant to narrate, list and enumerate and elaborate explanations of topics
25. 6. Leading role of the informant Try to get the informant to lead the discussion
Elaborations, explanations and new topical areas
26. 7. Prepared questions Dont use prepared questions to structure the entire interview
Prepared questions are introduced occasionally, secondarily, for example when the informant has finished explaining a topic
One exception to this rule:
Pre-testing
27. 8. Sequential interviews Bring up materials from the previous interviews during the subsequent encounters
Probe for more information
Verify understanding
Obtain more details
28. 9. Probing Probe for details, information, examples or cases
29. 10. Relationship Continue the relationship through the duration or the project
Try out hypotheses, models or themes
Get the informants reaction on hypotheses
Ask comments on drafts of reports
30. Take home messages Appreciate the complexity of observations
Unlearn quantitative methods to learn qualitative interviews
Develop rapport with key informants to understand the information in its context