1 / 13

CMS Upgrades

CMS Upgrades. Infrastructure Constraints Magnus Hansen CMS Upgrade Workshop at FNAL 20091028 - 20091030. Pre-amble. The current CMS has been in commission for the last two years CMS systems are generally ready for first beam but are we able to take high quality physics data?

varian
Télécharger la présentation

CMS Upgrades

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CMS Upgrades Infrastructure Constraints Magnus Hansen CMS Upgrade Workshop at FNAL 20091028 - 20091030

  2. Pre-amble • The current CMS has been in commission for the last two years • CMS systems are generally ready for first beam but are we able to take high quality physics data? • Stage 1 upgrades will be installed and commissioned in a running experiment in a highly competitive physics environment • The cost for any CMS downtime due to upgrade activity is likely to dwarf the cost of the upgrade itself • Could have put some frightening numbers here M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  3. Pre-amble • Upgraded systems need to operate in parallel with the previous, still fully functional, system it replaces • Comparison as well as Roll-back possible • Any required modifications on infrastructure need to be addressed > 1 year in advance • Need to install replacement system in USC55 prior to removing the soon to be replaced, leading to space problems M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  4. Potential Trigger Upgrade Racks in S1 (USC55) M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  5. One rack available in S1 • This rack is currently assigned to TTC • Empty and closed M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  6. Potential Trigger Upgrade Racks in S1 (USC55) M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  7. S2D • The racks in row D (ECAL) are empty and we should try to keep them that way M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  8. S2E • The rack in row E (RCT) is empty and we should try to keep it that way • The RCT spare rack could possibly be emptied too when the current system is stable M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  9. S2F • The racks in row F (HCAL) are empty and we should try to keep them that way too M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  10. Real Estate Summary • S1 • One centrally placed rack available • S2 • One but potentially four racks available in row D • One but potentially two racks available in row E • Three and potentially four racks available in row F • Be aware that HCAL is planning to upgrade OD at the same time or perhaps one year ahead M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  11. Rack cooling • The current thinking is to develop a trigger upgrade based on electronics modules with the AMC form factor (uTCA) • There are very cheap and handy bench top crates and controllers (MCH) available on the market • See for example G. Iles talk • The racks installed are equipped with vertical air flow cooling with air recycling and water-air heat exchangers • Desirable to install crates suitable for vertical air flow • The bench top crates are generally not suitable for vertical air flow, thus some effort may berequired M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  12. Rack cooling • The racks installed are one meter deep • uTCA crates are about 30cm deep leading to a front – back air impedance mismatch and potentially inefficient cooling • Could profit from rear space to install optical patch panels and possibly remote power supply (only bulk 12V and 3V3 service power required) • Wish list • Internal rack air filter • Issues with resistance to fire etc. • Drawer-like heat exchanger • Possible to pull out and clean M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

  13. Summary • It is hard to pull off a successful upgrade • The space available in USC55 is barely adequate provided that HCAL does not need any additional racks for the OD upgrade • Space efficient rack layouts need to developed and tested in b904 together with or prior to the electronics development M. Hansen, CERN. magnus.hansen@cern.ch

More Related