250 likes | 313 Vues
HEA HSP mini project study day 21 January 2009. Programme. Questions that focus on your enquiry. Why did I want to do this project/work? Who/What am I doing it for? How will I know if the work has been successful?. Questions that focus on your enquiry.
E N D
HEA HSP mini project study day 21 January 2009 Dr Marilyn Hammick
Programme Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Phase 10 projects • Interprofessional learning: exploring the benefits of engaging students in online peer mentoring.. • Of Sound Mind and Body? A Case Study.. • Randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a referral prioritization decision training tool for student occupational therapists. • Exploring the learner experience of ePortfolios for formative and summative feedback in the health sciences. • Evaluating clinically based vodcasts on the engagement of nursing students with research. Dr Marilyn Hammick
Three purposes of enquiry Capacity Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Four eeee’s Ethics Dr Marilyn Hammick
Rigorous & robust Three choices positivist interpretive and illuminative change Dr Marilyn Hammick
Enquiry ‘logic loop’ proving Quality improving Impact Outcomes Effectiveness Dr Marilyn Hammick
improving Four guiding principles – that an enquiry should be: • contributory: advances wider knowledge and/or understanding; • defensible in design: provides a research strategy which can address the questions posed; • rigorous in conduct: through the systematic and transparent collection, analysis and interpretation of data; • credible in claim: offers well-founded and plausible arguments about the significance of the data generated Ref: UK HM Government Strategy Unit Dr Marilyn Hammick
Quality judgement • Contribution • Design • Conduct • Claims Dr Marilyn Hammick
Contribution • Assessment of current knowledge • Identified need for knowledge • Takes organisational context into account • Transferability assessed Dr Marilyn Hammick
Defensible design • Theoretical richness • Evaluation question (s) • Clarity of aims and purpose • Criteria for outcomes and impact • Resources • Chronology Dr Marilyn Hammick
Conducted rigorously • Ethics and governance • Clarity and logic • sampling • data collection • analysis • synthesis • judgements Dr Marilyn Hammick
Makes credible claims Dr Marilyn Hammick
Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, Reeves S & Barr H (2007) A Best Evidence Systematic Review of Interprofessional Education BEME Guide No. 9 Medical Teacher29 (8): pp. 735-51. • Kirkpatrick D (1967) Evaluation of Training. In Craig R, Bittel L, editors. Training and Development Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 131-167. Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
in other words • Importance and value • Making a difference • Foundations and springboard Dr Marilyn Hammick
Your project … • Five potential risks to the project • Mitigating against the risks Dr Marilyn Hammick
How it feels now … • In six words Dr Marilyn Hammick