Arsenic Mitigation In Bangladesh A Household Labor Market Approach

1. Arsenic Mitigation In BangladeshA Household Labor Market Approach Richard T. Carson University of California, San Diego Phoebe Koundouri Athens University of Economics and Business Céline Nauges French Institute for Research in Agriculture (INRA) Toulouse School of Economics

2. Basic Story Line • Dramatic reductions in morbidity and mortality related to water borne biological pathogens were achieved in Bangladesh in 1980’s and 1990’s by switching from surface water sources to tube wells • Freed women from carrying water

3. Over 9 million tube wells were drilled • Vast majority were shallow (10 to 70 meters) • Low technology solution • Now serve over 95% of rural population • UNICEF and other aid organizations encouraged and helped finance

4. Unfortunately, water from many of these wells were later found out to be contaminated with arsenic • Low level arsenic poisoning builds up in human body • Causes a wide range of health problems • Effects occur over 10 to 30+ year time horizon • Initial symptoms: lethargy, sores on feet/hands, headaches • Longer term symptoms: various forms of cancer, organ failure The World Health Organization calls the arsenic drinking water contamination in Bangladesh “the largest mass poisoning of a population in history”

5. Purpose and Main Findings • This paper looks at impact of arsenic exposure in rural Bangladesh on household labor supply • Overall effects • Relative to zero baseline, arsenic contamination associated with ~8% reduction in household labor hours • Within household substitution • Prime age males work relative more, females less • Relationship to different types of assets • Land, other physical assets, human capital • Surprisingly, no existing work on this issue

6. Arsenic in Bangladesh Groundwater Wells • Widespread arsenic contamination discovered in large scale survey of wells done by British Geological Survey (2001) • Our sample average arsenic concentration 62 μg/liter • Our sample range [0.3 to 421] • WHO standard 10 μg liter; Bangladesh standard 50 μg liter • 57 million people exposed to WHO standard or greater

7. Econometric Identification Strategy • Arsenic contamination function of geological conditions • Use data from time period before widespread knowledge of arsenic contamination in specific well • Spatially merge data from the British Geological Survey (BGS, 2001) of groundwater wells (done in mid 1998-late 1999) with Bangladesh government’s Household Income and Expenditure Survey done in 2000.

8. Our Dataset • Merge takes place at thana level—5th order subdistrict small enough that BGS levels highly correlated with actual exposure but large enough that households ~independent • 220 thanas each with 20 sampled households • A few areas not sampled by BGS (e.g., close to Burma) • Bangladesh Division→Area→Region→District→Thana→Union→Village→Household • 4,259 households after a small amount of data cleaning

9. Household Hours Worked (HHW) • Labor hours recorded for any type of remunerated work • Each household member • Paid in money or in-kind/household farm or firm • Hours “worked” at home not recorded • Approach taken • Add together labor hours supplied by each house member • Use household demographic characteristics as regressors • Number of member in each sex/age category • Other household demographics variables

10. Choice of Modeling Framework • Survival model framework with number of hours worked as “time” variable • Most commonly used is Cox Proportional Hazard Model • Basic model: h(HHWi | Xi, ASi) = h0(HHW)exp(αASi + βXi), where HHWi is household hours work, Xi demographic composition of household, ASi is arsenic level

11. Base Model (Arsenic Excluded)Pattern of Demographic Results • Increase in HHW for females 6-25, particularly pronounced for 16-25 age group • No significant deviation from 1 for older females • Increase in HHW for males of all ages starting with [6-10] • HHW roughly constant from 16-55, enormously significant • Quadratic with acres, linear HHW down, quadratic up • HHW goes up with assets, down with Max house educ.

12. Adding Arsenic • Linear term only 1.0108 (t=6.45) • Quadratic specification • Linear 1.0226 (t=4.59) • Quadratic 0.9996 (t=-2.50) • HHW is decreasing in arsenic but at a slowly decreasing rate • Turning point is at ~300 μg (3% of data beyond that point) and at ~580 μg in specification with interactions

13. Predicted Effect on HHW • Reducing arsenic level to zero • Increase HHW by 7.9% • Reducing arsenic to WHO standard (10 μg) • Increase HHW by 6.5% • Reduce arsenic to Bangladesh standard (50 μg) • Increase HHW by 3.6%

14. Summary • For poor in many places, labor hours main asset • Bangladesh in 2000 ideal for examining the impact of large scale low level chronic health problems induced by exogenous and unknown arsenic exposure • Estimated effect large, 7.9% reduction HHW

15. Compensation mechanisms • Given overall arsenic reduction, more work by prime age males, less by females • Reduces loss of income • Physical assets decrease arsenic related loss in HHW • Land assets increase arsenic related loss in HHW • Max household education increases arsenic related loss in HHW