1 / 19

Instrumentation of Very Forward Region in Linear Collider Detector

This project involves optimizing detector design through MC simulations & sensor prototypes. Comparing different technologies & aiming for construction within two years.

vborrego
Télécharger la présentation

Instrumentation of Very Forward Region in Linear Collider Detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Instrumentation of the very Forward Region of a Linear Collider Detector Wolfgang Lohmann DESY (Zeuthen) Colorado, Cracow, DESY(Zeuthen), JINR Dubna, London (UC), Minsk (BSU), Prague, Protvino ( IHEP), Tel Aviv Collaboration IEEE

  2. The very Forward Calorimeter Collaboration see: PRC R&D 01/02

  3. The TESLA Detector

  4. Functions of the very Forward Detectors • Detection of Electrons and Photons at very low angle • Measurement of the Luminosity (LAT) • Shielding of the inner Detector • Fast Beam Diagnostics (LCAL) LCAL 300 cm VTX FTD IP LAT

  5. Measurement of the Luminosity Beam Offsets: < 200 μm Inner Radius of Cal. < 0.75 μm Distance of Cals. < 60 μm Center-of-Mass Energy: Process dependent Gauge Process: e+e- e+e- Goal: 10-4 Precision (LEP: 3.4 10-4) • Physics Case: sZ for Giga-Z Two Fermion Cross Section at high Energy, Threshold Scans Requirements on Alignment and mechanical Precision (rough Estimate) • Technology: Si-W Sandwich Calorimeter • MC Simulations Optimisation of Shape and Segmantation • Alignment with Laser Beams

  6. Measurement of the Luminosity e+e-e+e- (g) Simulations with BHWIDE 8 cm Q Resolution as function of the depth 28 cm Rings 20 -20 300 330

  7. Some systematics in Q Reconstruction Q Resolution as function of the number of cylinders

  8. Fast Beam Diagnostics e+ e- • e+e- pairs from beamstrahlung are deflected into the LCAL • 15000 e+e- per BX 10 – 20 TeV • 10 MGy per year Rad. hard sensors • Technologies: Diamond-W Sandwich Scintillator crystals Gas ionisation chamber GeV Deposited energy over R and f contains information about beam parameters

  9. Schematic views Heavy crystals W-Diamond sandwich sensor Space for electronics

  10. 1st Results: Single Parameter Analysis

  11. Detection of Electrons and Photons at very low angle • Tag of two photon events

  12. Detection of Electrons and Photons at very low angle • essential parameters: Small Molière radius High granularity Longitudinal segmentation • Two photon event rejection e+e- e+e-m+m- (Severe background for particle searches) 500 BX • Electromagnetic fakes 1% from physics 2% from fluctuations

  13. Real Beam Simulations Includes seismic motions, Delay of Beam Feedback System, Lumi Optimisation etc.

  14. Sensor prototyping, Diamonds • Different surface treatments : • #1 – substrate side polished; 300 um • #2 – cut substrate; 200 um • #3 – growth side polished; 300 um • #4 – both sides polished; 300 um Diamond; Size: 12x12 mm 2 Metallisation: 10 nm Ti + 400nm Au Current (I) dependence on the voltage (V) Ohmic behavior for ‘ramping up/down’, hysteresis Charge collection distance is saturated to 60 mm at ~300V

  15. Sensor prototyping, Crystals Light Yield from direct coupling Plastic scintilator and using a fibre Study with heavy crystals (Cerenkov light) is going on ~ 25 %

  16. Sensor prototyping, C3F8 Gas Ionisation Chamber Pads for charge collection Beam Test 26 GeV e- beam, 103s-1 Current vs Voltage Pressure vessel

  17. Summary • The Instrumentation of the Very Forward Region of a • LC is a challenging Topic • MC Simulations to optimise the Design are progressing • Different Detector Technologies will be compared • Tests with Sensor Prototypes have been started • After about two Years we will present a TDR • The Goal is to start with the construction and test of a prototype

  18. Charge collection distance measurements Qmeas. = Qcreated x ccd / L ADC Sr90 PA delay diamond Scint. discr & PM1 Gate discr PM2 Using electrons from a Sr90 source (mips)

  19. Sensor prototyping and lab tests • Current (I) dependence on the voltage (V) • Ohmic behavior for ‘ramping up/down’, hysteresis • Resistance in the order of 100 TOhm • Current decays with time • After 24 h nearly 1/2

More Related