1 / 23

On manuscript preparation and journal submission: Case of MTL and JRME

On manuscript preparation and journal submission: Case of MTL and JRME. Shuk-kwan S. Leung National Sun Yat-sen University law@mail.nsysu.edu.tw June 20th, 2008. Three issues to consider….

vera-bray
Télécharger la présentation

On manuscript preparation and journal submission: Case of MTL and JRME

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. On manuscript preparation and journal submission: Case of MTL and JRME Shuk-kwan S. LeungNational Sun Yat-sen Universitylaw@mail.nsysu.edu.twJune 20th, 2008

  2. Three issues to consider… • What are some considerations to keep in mind as I undertake my research? Will my research make a significant contribution to knowledge? (1. RESEARCH) • What qualities of my paper will make it worthy of publication? Is my message clear, powerful, accurate, and succinct? (2. MANUSCRIPT) • Is this journal a “home” for my report? (3. SUBMISSION) http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  3. Manuscript Preparation • Cover letter file • Manuscript file • Figures and tables • Appendix • Reference Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  4. Some Writing Hints • Be sure your grammar is correct. • Make sure sections naturally flow from one to another. • Avoid passive voice. Use “I analyzed the data …” rather than “the data were analyzed…” • When you use words such as “it” and “this”, indicate what the referent is. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  5. Key Elements of Report • Worthwhileness: Does the report add to our understanding of issues in our field? • Coherence: Did the research methods and analysis address the research questions? • Competence: Were the appropriate data collection, analyses, and interpretation techniques used? http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  6. Finalizing a manuscript • Ensure appropriate style guidelines are followed. • Several drafts will be needed. • Seek feedback from colleagues. • Carefully proof read. • Be aware of the requirements of the review process. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  7. Submission: Which journal? • Aims and scope • Nature of articles • Journal requirements • Acceptance rate • International Standing http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  8. MTL (Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal) • Editor: Lyn D. English • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group (2008~); Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.(1999~2008) http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  9. What articles MTL publishes? • Direct at researchers from the perspective of psychology, sociology, philosophy, anthropology, mathematics and information technology, with a particular focus on mathematical thinking, reasoning and learning. • Follow Up Activity: read appendix for MTL index and find articles in the following categories: Research articles; theoretical and philosophical analyses; special issues; books reviews; interviews with well known scientists or articles in memory of past mathematics educators. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  10. MTL review process • Chief-editor makes an invitation • Reviewers reply within 6 weeks, send in a recommendation. • Chief-editor reply to authors with decision. • Reviewers can read decision letter and report of own and others’ review. • Authors send reply. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  11. MTL reviewers’ recommendation: • Accept • Accept subject to revision • Reject but encourage revision and resubmission (THIS IS OFTEN THE MOST CHANLLENGING REPORT TO PREPARE BY REVIEWERS) • Reject http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  12. Decision Letter from MTL Editor • Don’t get upset on receipt of reviews. • Carefully analyze reviewers’ criticisms and suggestions, together with editor’s letter. • Consider each concern and determine how you will address it. • Not all reviewers’ concerns have to be addressed but most will. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  13. Criticism by MTL reviewers (Read and write 1, 2, or 3?) • Not relevant to aims and scope of MTL • Lack of clear research aims, questions • Significance of study not evident (“So what?” question) • Inadequate theoretical framework • Theory presented doesn’t guide or support the study, data analysis, and findings/recommendations • Terminology not defined clearly • Weaknesses in data analysis, such as lack of clarity re coding schemes used • Lack of cohesion, poor structure, problems with written expression • Failure to adhere to the style guidelines of the journal http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  14. JRME (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education) • JRME is a forum for disciplined inquiry into the teaching and learning of mathematics. It is devoted to the interests of teachers of mathematics and mathematics education at all levels — preschool through adult. (7000 subscribers; 150-180 submissions per year; 10% acceptance) • Editor: Steven R. Williams • Publisher: NCTM http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  15. What articles JRME publishes? • We publish a variety of manuscripts: reports of research, including experiments, case studies, surveys, philosophical studies, and historical studies; articles about research, including literature reviews and theoretical analyses; brief reports of research; critiques of articles and books; and brief commentaries on issues pertaining to research. • Follow Up Activity: Go to JRME website and browse titles. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  16. JRME review process • Typically 4 reviewers; I EP member (9 total) plus mix of domestic/foreign, theory/method competence, experienced/new • Reviewers are asked to evaluate the following aspects of a manuscript: Importance/Relevance; Soundness of Methodology and Argument; Quality of Presentation • Reviewers also make a publication recommendation • Usually 3-4 month review cycle. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  17. JRME Reviewers’ Recommendations • Accept the manuscript “as is” (i.e., without further revisions or additional review) • Accept the manuscript pending revisions but without additional review • Reject the manuscript, but encourage the author to revise and resubmit a new version for additional review(s) • Reject the manuscript http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  18. Decisions from JRME Editor • Accept the manuscript (without additional review) pending receipt of a revision that incorporates all required modifications • Reject the manuscript • Reject the manuscript, but encourage the author to revise and resubmit a new version for additional review (s) http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  19. Common concern of reviewers: 1, 2, or 3? • Are the research questions pertain to issues of significant theoretical or pragmatic concern? Are they well-grounded in theory or in prior research? • Is there an appropriate match between the research question (s) and the methods and analyses employed to answer the question (s)? • Does the conduct of the study include the effective application of appropriate data collection, analysis, and interpretation techniques? • Are the claims and conclusions in the manuscript justified in some acceptable way, and do they logically follow from the data or information presented? • Is the writing lucid, clear, and well-organized? http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  20. ENDING: Authors send reply with manuscript revision • Prepare a letter to the editor explaining how you have addressed reviewer’s concerns. • Submit your revised paper and letter. • If article is totally rejected, follow suggestions for improvement and select another outlet. • If article is accepted, send to colleagues as an “In press” http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  21. References: • Silver, E. A., Sowder, J. T. (2006). Lecture on “Publishing Research In Mathematics Education: Advice from Two Recent Editors ofThe Journal For Research In Mathematics Education” Sowder (1996-2000); Silver (2000-2004). NSC Writing Workshops. Jan 10th, 2006, Hualin. • English, L. D. (2007). Lecture on “Publishing Your Work in Scholarly Journals and Books”, Queensland University of Technology, Jan 16th, 2007. http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  22. Three issues to consider… • What are some considerations to keep in mind as I undertake my research? Will my research make a significant contribution to knowledge? (1. RESEARCH) • What qualities of my paper will make it worthy of publication? Is my message clear, powerful, accurate, and succinct? (2. MANUSCRIPT) • Is this journal a “home” for my report? (3. SUBMISSION) http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/leung/080620/NSC_0620.html

  23. Thank You!

More Related