1 / 17

At Promise/At Risk Report College Community School Board October 15, 2012

At Promise/At Risk Report College Community School Board October 15, 2012. Overview. Former Mental Model At Risk = Failure in School IDM process= Instructional Decision Making Current State Tights: *All kids can learn

verena
Télécharger la présentation

At Promise/At Risk Report College Community School Board October 15, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. At Promise/At Risk Report College Community School Board October 15, 2012

  2. Overview Former Mental Model At Risk = Failure in School IDM process= Instructional Decision Making Current State Tights: *All kids can learn *PLC—working in collaborative teams focused on learning and results Desired State Shift to RTI=ALL Students in Tier I in Continuous Improvement Cycle

  3. IDM(RTI Triangle 1)Former Mental Model

  4. IDM - Stats GEI Plans - 781 total plans for 11-12 school year • New: 224 or 29% Intervention Type: • Supplemental: 343 or 44% • Intensive: 181 or 23 % • **more time on documentation than on instruction…if we spend more time on instruction, then we should see fewer kids needing plans

  5. IDM - Stats AREAS: Reading: 405 or 52% Math: 275 or 35% Written Language: 35 or 4% Behavior: 61 or 8% Physical/Motor/Sensory: 6 or 1% Science: 0 **where would we put our focus within core instruction and CIC?

  6. IDM – SIAC Goal #2 Current State SIAC Goal Type Goal 80% of K-5 and 6-12 students receiving intervention services will be At Standard (k-5) or receive a passing grade (6-12) in English, Math, Social Studies, and Science

  7. SIAC Goal…Reflective Questions Do we want goals that are deeper than passing grades—the why questions? Why is a student failing? Those conversations need to happen frequently based on data—this is the work of our collaborative teams and our administrators.

  8. RTI Triangle 2 CORE INSTRUCTION FOR ALL

  9. Looking at Data Where have we found success for our kids? What data is causing us to look deeper at our practice?

  10. At-Risk/At-PromiseStructures and Programming to Assist Students2012-2013 Learning Resource Center—Point Learning Strategies—integrates reading--Point HS 540 HS 360 Credit Recovery (HS and Point) Supported Math in HS and Point Success Center (HS) Alternative HS Kirkwood HS Completion

  11. At-Risk/At-Promise2011-2012 Alternative High School – 1st Semester

  12. At Risk/At-Promise2011-2012 Alternative High School – 2nd Semester

  13. At-Risk/At-PromiseAlternative High School Data2011-2012 1st Semester • 17 credits were earned by juniors • 80 credits were earned by seniors • 6 credits were earned by sophomores • 2 seniors graduated 2nd Semester • 30 credits were earned by juniors • 57.5 credits were earned by seniors • 8.25 credits were earned by sophomores • 13 seniors graduated

  14. Suspension Center Data2011-2012

  15. At-Risk/At-PromiseReflect on the Data New Lens--flipping the triangle upside down New People, New Perspectives Different perspectives cause new questions (Just Like the State…DE)

  16. Future State Constant Collaboration and PL Focus on core instruction with differentiation from formative assessments, targeted interventions, then to intensive work as needed Questions—Reflections?

More Related