1 / 26

B 0 s  J/ y f LHC review

B 0 s  J/ y f LHC review. Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze For the ATLAS, CMS and LHCb collaborations Oxford, 28 th September 2006 Beauty 2006 The 11 th International Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines. Outline. B 0 s mesons and the B 0 s  J/ y f decay

verity
Télécharger la présentation

B 0 s  J/ y f LHC review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. B0s  J/yfLHC review Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze For the ATLAS, CMS and LHCb collaborations Oxford, 28th September 2006 Beauty 2006The 11th International Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines

  2. Outline • B0s mesons and the B0s  J/yf decay • Reconstruction and selection with LHC detectors • Analysis and parameter extraction B0s J/y fLHC review

  3. B0s mixing s B0s B0s s s Bs are too heavy to be produced at U(4s) B factories • studied with high statistics at hadron colliders • CDF and D0 results on mixing • Standard Model prediction for DGs/Gs ~ 0.10 • DGs= 0.54 DGs= 0.54 17 ps-1 <Dms <21 ps-1 @ 90% CL Dms =17.77 ± 0.10 ± 0.07ps-1 B0s J/y fLHC review

  4. Bs  J/   m+m-K+K- BR(BsJ/ )=(9.3±3.3)x10-4 BR(J/m+m-)=(5.93±0.06)% BR (K+K-)=(49.2±0.6)% Vts* Vtb Vcb s t V*cs b t s Vtb Vts* CP violating weak phase SM predicts s = 2bs~ O(0.03) B0s J/y fLHC review

  5. New physics in s • Present measurements still allow for almost arbitrary NP contributions to s • Measuring s will greatly constrain flavour violation in NP models B0s J/y fLHC review

  6. Bs J/  ℓ+ K+ ℓ- K- p p Bs decay products are both JPC = 1--states The final state hasCP = +1ifL = 0,2andCP = -1ifL = 1 The two contributions with opposite CP can be separated with an angular analysis of the final decay products B0s J/y fLHC review

  7. Angular distributions Time evolution is a function of the transversity amplitudesA0(t), A||(t) (CP = +1)and A(t) (CP = -1) Known functions of the three angles ,y,fdescribing decay product kinematics in the transversity basis B0s J/y fLHC review

  8. Angular distributions - tagged moduli2 interference The distributions depend on 8 independent parameters • Amplitudes |A||(0)|,|A(0)| - Strong phases 1, 2 • Width difference ΔΓs = (ΓH - ΓL) - Average width Γs = (ΓH+ΓL)/2 • Mass difference Δms- Weak phase s B0s J/y fLHC review

  9. Angular distributions - untagged • Remarkable feature: • If DGs≠0 the distributions are still sensitive to the weak phase fs • Terms with Dms cancel: not necessary to resolve the very fast oscillations B0s J/y fLHC review

  10. b production atLHC Luminosity 2x1033 cm-2s-1 (ATLAS, CMS 2009) 2x1032 cm-2s-1 (LHCb) s = 0.5 mb  about 106 (105) bb pairs/sec B Physics at LHC B0s J/y fLHC review

  11. The detectors CMS ATLAS LHCb • Dedicated forward detector • RICH for PID • Triggering VELO • Multipurpouse central detectors B0s J/y fLHC review

  12. Trigger selection Details in talks by J. Kirk and E. Rodrigues ATLAS/CMS LHCb • Di-muon trigger at L1 • Decay chain reconstruction with fast/regional tracking at HLT (lifetime biased) • Di-muon trigger at L0 • L1/HLT: lifetime unbiased single & di-muon streams + lifetime biased J/y stream ATLAS : pT (m,m) > 6,3 GeV/c CMS : pT (m,m) > 3,3 GeV/c LHCb : SpT(m1,m2) > 1.5 GeV/c B0s J/y fLHC review

  13. Offline reconstruction K+ K- s • m reco with tracker + ID with muon detector • K reco with tracker - ID only in LHCb • Common 4-track vertex • p(B0s) // L • Flavour tagging B0s J/y fLHC review

  14. Kinematic fitting Constraints applied • Common 4 track vertex • J/y mass constraint • Vertex pointing constraint CMS Mass resolution = 14 MeV/c2 B0s J/y fLHC review

  15. Proper time resolutions CMS - st = 77 fs LHCb - <terr> = 36.0 fs ATLAS - st = 84 fs B0s J/y fLHC review

  16. Event yields Background is mostly combinatorial for LHCb, combinatorial + B0J/yK*0m+m-K±p+ for ATLAS/CMS ( ) ( ) B0s J/y fLHC review

  17. Angular analysis • Goal: extract from the angular distributions of the decay products the parameters of interest (e.g. DGs/Gs , fs) • In principle: single maximum likelihood fit to extract the parameters simultaneously from all available data • In practice: many parameters, complicated distributions  use different multi-step approaches to fitting B0s J/y fLHC review

  18. First step: untagged fit • Example: CMS measurement of DGs/Gs , fs Maximum likelihood fit with P.D.F. signal BdJ/yK* bkg Combinatorial bkg Angular distributions to extract e(t,Q) – selection efficiency as function of proper time & angles Gs(m,ms,ss) – mass resoultion (gaussian) B0s J/y fLHC review

  19. Selection efficiency • e(t,Q) • As a function of proper time • As a function of angles B0s J/y fLHC review

  20. Results – untagged analysis • Statistical error for 100k evts (NSEL with Lint = 10 fb-1) CMS also evaluated Angular Moments analysis, results only slightly worse than MLH fit • Systematical errors for 13k evts (NSEL with Lint = 1.3 fb-1) Main source is modeling of proper time bias  need control samples to measure in data B0s J/y fLHC review

  21. Next step: tagged fit • Example: LHCb one-angle distribution analysis • Flavour tagging methods used: • OS l, OS K, OS Vtx charge, SS K • Performance e=57%, wtag=33%  eeff=6.6% • Dms and wtag determined using BsDsp as control sample B0s J/y fLHC review

  22. Results: tagged analysis • LHCb also combines other lower statistics decays to CP eigenstates (no angular analysis) • Could also add J/y e+e- channel (not included here, statistics 1/6 of J/y m+m-) B0s J/y fLHC review

  23. Results - summary Results for one year at nominal low luminosity B0s J/y fLHC review

  24. Conclusions • Any large NP effect will be seen “soon” • SM value of fs will be found at 3s within 5 years data taking at LHCb • ATLAS & CMS can also give good contributions to the measurement B0s J/y fLHC review

  25. Acknowledgements • M. Smizanska, J. Catmore for the ATLAS collaboration • V. Ciulli, N. Magini, L. Wilke, T. Speer, K. Prokofiev, S. Shulga, T. Ilicheva for the CMS collaboration • J. Van Hunen, L. Fernandez for the LHCb collaboration B0s J/y fLHC review

  26. References • CMS-NOTE 2006/121 • LHCb NOTE 2006/047 and L. Fernandez, PhD Thesis • ATLAS Physics and detector performance TDR. Vol. II B0s J/y fLHC review

More Related