1 / 19

Research Methodology 8 . Pengujian Tesis

Research Methodology 8 . Pengujian Tesis. Romi Satria Wahon o romi@romisatriawahono.net http :// romisatriawahono.net/rm WA/SMS : +6281586220090. Romi Satria Wahono. SD Sompok Semarang (1987) SMPN 8 Semarang (1990) SMA Taruna Nusantara Magelang (1993)

vianca
Télécharger la présentation

Research Methodology 8 . Pengujian Tesis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Methodology8. PengujianTesis Romi Satria Wahonoromi@romisatriawahono.nethttp://romisatriawahono.net/rmWA/SMS: +6281586220090

  2. Romi Satria Wahono • SD SompokSemarang (1987) • SMPN 8 Semarang (1990) • SMA Taruna NusantaraMagelang (1993) • B.Eng, M.Eng and Dr.Eng(on-leave)Department of Computer ScienceSaitama University, Japan (1994-2004) • Research Interests: Software Engineering and Intelligent Systems • Founder IlmuKomputer.Com • LIPI Researcher (2004-2007) • Founder and CEO PT BrainmaticsCiptaInformatika

  3. Course Outline • Pengantar Penelitian • TahapanPenelitian • Masalah Penelitian • Literature Review • StrukturPenulisanTesis • KesalahanPenulisanTesis • MetodeEksperimen • PengujianTesis • PublikasiPenelitian

  4. 8. PengujianTesis

  5. 8.1 PembimbinganPenelitian

  6. Actor dalam Penelitian Tesis • The student, who identifies, approaches and solves a problem • The supervisor, who guides you in your work • The examiner, who critically assesses your work

  7. Student – Supervisor – Examiner

  8. 8.2 Parameter Penilaian

  9. PenilaianSkripsi (Berndtsson, 2008) • General: Examiners will look at the relevance and appropriateness of the topic you have studied, the significance of the findings and the amount of contribution you have achieved • Report: Examiners will look for clarity, consistency, an appropriate use of arguments, a clear differentiation between your own work and that of others in the literature and appropriate referencing • Defence: Examiners will assess the types of arguments you have made to support and defend your claims and conclusions. They will also look for your own insight and understanding in the work you have presented • Other: Examiners will review the administrative issues of your project. For example, have you followed the regulations correctly? Have you provided the right documentation at the right time?

  10. PenilaianSkripsi (Berndtsson, 2008) • General • Relevance of chosen topic • Originality of chosen topic • Significance of findings • Degree to which the work is the student’s own work • Report • Clarity of presentation • Consistency between different parts of the report • Degree of insight apparent from the arguments presented to support the choices that the student has made • Ability to differentiate between others’ thoughts and own • Ability to handle references and citations • General stylistic impression

  11. PenilaianSkripsi (Berndtsson, 2008) • Defence • Degree of insight apparent from the arguments presented to support claims and conclusions • Degree of insight apparent from discussion in response to relevant questions • Other • How the students performed as opponent • Fulfillment of deadlines and other formal requirements

  12. PenilaianTesis (Chinneck, 1999) • What was the research question? • Is it a ‘good’ question? This involves a comprehensive literature review to ensure that the question is ‘useful’ – i.e., worth answering. Through the literature review the student will show the context of the question, that the question has not been answered before and the extent to which others may have partly answered the question in the past. • Has the student answered the question adequately? • Has the student made an adequate contribution to knowledge?

  13. PenilaianTesis • General considerations: These considerations occur in all types of projects at all degree levels • Foundations of your project: is its existence justified within other literature in the field? • The project approach from a technical perspective (i.e., not a project management viewpoint). Were the correct methods used? Were appropriate data gathered? • Results and contribution of the project. This is particularly important at postgraduate level where the ultimate contribution of the work is the quality measure used

  14. Rangkuman Penilaian Tesis (RSW) • Research: • Validasi MasalahdanKontribusi Penelitian • MetodePenelitian, Evaluasi dan Validasi Metode Yang Diusulkan • Hasil Penelitian dan PenarikanKesimpulan • Report: • Teknik Penulisan Ilmiah • Penerapan Standard Formatting • Citation and Reference • Presentation: • AlurdanTahapan Presentasi • Penguasaan Materi Presentasi • ArgumentasidalamMempertahankan Ide

  15. 8.3 KiatMempersiapkan Slide danPresentasi

  16. KiatMempersiapkan Slide • Secaraumumalurpresentasisebaiknyamengikutialurtesis • Gunakan theme slide putihbersih, hindarimenggunakangambardananimasi yang tidakperlu • Gunakan font hitamuntukisi slide, dan kata-kata yang pentingbisadiberipenekanandengan font warnamerahataubiru • Ukuran font janganlebihkecildari 20pt, usahakanmenggunakan 28pt atau 26pt • Citation bolehdiselipkan di kalimatdalam slide, dengan font yang disetlebihkecil (18pt or 20pt) • Slide tidakberisi paragraph penuh, slide hanyapoin-poinpentingsaja, berikanilustrasigambarbiladiperlukan • Gunakan slide size standard (4:3) karenasecaraumum projector mendukungukuranini, janganpernahgunakan size widescreen (16:9)

  17. KiatPresentasi di UjianTesis -1- • Lakukanpresentasidengantenang, gunakansuaralantangdanmeyakinkan • Atursuarasupayatidakterlalutergesa-gesadanjugatidakterlalulambat • Beripenekanansuaraterhadappoin-poin yang kitaanggappenting • Janganpernahmembaca slide! Kita akankehilanganruhterhadappresentasikitabilamulaimembaca slide • Slide hanyaberisipoin-poin, karenaituhapalkankalimat yang inginkitaungkapkandenganberdasarkankepoin-poin di slide tersebut

  18. KiatPresentasi di UjianTesis -2- • Dalamsesitanyajawab, dengarkandengantenang, catatbilaperluapa yang diungkapkanpenguji. Tunggusampaipengujiselesaibicara, janganmemotongdenganjawabansingkat, karenaitumembuatjawabankitatidakkomprehensif, dan ide kitagampangdijatuhkan • Pahamidanhapalkanreferensiutamakita, jawabpertanyaandengansuaralantangdan meyakinkan, denganlandasan yang shahihdanjelasdarireferensi yang kitapahamitersebut • Janganmendebatdengantanpalandasan, janganbanyakgunakan “sayaduga/pikir”, terimakalaukoreksidaripengujimemanglogis, sampaikanbahwaakanmelakukanrevisi di bagian yang telahdikoreksipenguji

  19. Referensi • Christian W. Dawson, Project in Computing and Information System a Student Guide 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2009 • Mikael Berndtsson, Jörgen Hansson, Björn Olsson, Björn Lundell, Thesis Projects - A Guide for Students in Computer Science and Information System 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2008 • C.R. Kothari, Research Methodology, New Age International, 2004 • David E Gray, Doing Research in the Real World Second Edition, Sage Publications, 2009 • Mary Shaw, Writing Good Software Engineering Research Papers, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003 • Geoffrey Marczyk, David DeMatteo, David Festinger, Essentials of ResearchDesignand Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005

More Related