1 / 19

Objective Model

Objective Model. Reported as facts without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, interpretations Neutrality (factual v. interpretive claims) Balance Reliability. Is Objectivity Possible? Major Lessons of Chapter 1. Major news media are owned/controlled by major corporations.

Télécharger la présentation

Objective Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Objective Model • Reported as facts without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, interpretations • Neutrality (factual v. interpretive claims) • Balance • Reliability

  2. Is Objectivity Possible?Major Lessons of Chapter 1 • Major news media are owned/controlled by major corporations. • Mainstream media outlets have been consolidated into fewer and fewer hands, each of which is part of the corporate system. • Inner-ring or upper tier media outlets have grown larger and more influential through horizontal and vertical integration. • Agenda setting media serve in numerous ways with other corporations including interlocking directorates. • Media are mainly concerned with profit/advertising dollars. • Media rely heavily on information provided by government sources. • The powerful have greater ability to produce “flak” in order to influence media coverage. • Perspectives that threaten the status quo are least likely to appear in the media.

  3. Social Construction • Social problems are “constructed” (i.e., created), often through the media • Reporting of real problem • Blown out of proportion • Typification (frames/narratives) • Linkage • Policy created

  4. http://www.pscj.appstate.edu/media/moralpanics.html

  5. Newsweek’s “Coke Plague” Story(March 17, 1986) Shocking Numbers and Graphic Accounts: Quantified Images of Drug Problems in the Print Media James D. Orcutt & J. Blake Turner Social Problems, Vol. 40, No. 2. (May, 1993), pp. 190-206.

  6. Panel A – actual data (depicts “lifetime” use not “current” use) Newsweek’s “Coke Plague” Story(March 17, 1986)

  7. Panel B – editorial deletions Cut out large increases in late 1970s Cut out foundation or “context” of data Newsweek’s “Coke Plague” Story(March 17, 1986)

  8. Panel C – tinkering with figure Made a “finer” Y scale (makes increase look larger) Newsweek’s “Coke Plague” Story(March 17, 1986)

  9. Panel D – more tinkering with figure Added depth (3-D) to make look larger Called it a “plague” Newsweek’s “Coke Plague” Story(March 17, 1986)

  10. ACTUAL Cocaine Use(MTF, 12th graders) % Current Users

More Related