1 / 6

Snowmass Summary: Next steps with P-5

Snowmass Summary: Next steps with P-5. D. MacFarlane August 23, 2013. Goals for the P5 Process. T akes the science vision of the community and produce a feasible and executable 10-year plan

viho
Télécharger la présentation

Snowmass Summary: Next steps with P-5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Snowmass Summary:Next steps with P-5 D. MacFarlane August 23, 2013

  2. Goals for the P5 Process • Takes the science vision of the community and produce a feasible and executable 10-year plan • HEP MUST have a planning and prioritization process that the community can stand behind and support once completed • Key elements envisioned for the P5 process: • Revisit the questions we use to describe the field (eg. Quantum Universe, updated and corrected) • Decide on the project priorities within budget guidance (in detail for the next 10 years, in broad outline beyond that) • Propose the best way to describe the value of HEP research to society • Build on the investment in Snowmass process and outcomes Snowmass Summary: Next steps with P-5

  3. P5 Process • P5 panel of about 20+ members, similar in size to previous panels • Chair (Steve Ritz) and HEPAP Chair (Andy Lankford) working on membership • Charge also under discussion: could back away from specific scenarios and focus more on science strategy • Community input • Several “town meetings” (4-5) as public forums not only to advocate for particular science opportunities but also to prioritize • Working subgroup for updating the Quantum Universe questions in parallel with science priority discussion

  4. Two separate (non-P5) working groups • Science Connections, highlighting the scientific areas where HEP advances, informs, and benefits from other DOE/SC programs • Co-chairs Shamit Kachru (Stanford/SLAC) and Curt Callan (Princeton) • HEP Impact, developing a potential list of messages for the U.S. HEP community to use in communicating the broad impact of HEP in technology, workforce development, and other societal benefits • Interested parties are strongly encouraged to engage with the Education and Outreach group at Snowmass • These groups would produce short reports to HEPAP/P5 by the end of the calendar year in order to provide timely input that can be integrated by P5

  5. Draft Proposed Town Meetings • First meeting on the overall strategy • Questions to describe the field, and discussion of how technology development priorities and other crosscutting issues should be covered in the P5 report • Subsequent meetings will focus on open community discussion of project priorities • Meetings organized around science questions or Frontiers • Based on the results of the first 4 meetings, a 5th ‘wrap up’ meeting to discuss any broad matters arising

  6. P5 Timeline May: DOE/NSF agree on outlines of P5 process and inform community via presentations and “dear colleague” letter June: Call for nominations to P5 July: Agencies draft P5 charge. HEPAP Chair reviews P5 nominations and begins selection process August : Snowmass meeting. P5 charge sent to HEPAP Chair. Sept : HEPAP Meeting. Snowmass reports issued. P5 charge and membership formally announced. Timeline for P5 meetings announced. Fall 2013 : Town Meetings (4 or 5, venues and topics TBD) Winter/Spring 2014 : P5 meetings (phone in and face to face) Spring/Summer 2014 : P5 report(s) due. Exact dates and deliverables to be spelled out in P5 charge.

More Related