1 / 7

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Does diversity add essential ingredients to the educational process?. How the Case M oved T hrough the Courts. Political cartoon analysis.

vilina
Télécharger la présentation

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) Does diversity add essential ingredients to the educational process?

  2. How the Case Moved Through the Courts

  3. Political cartoon analysis • Analyze the cartoon below in terms of its meaning related to the Michigan affirmative action cases,Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger. • What do you see in the cartoon? Make a list. Include objects, people, and any characteristics that seem to be exaggerated. • Which of the items on the list from Question 1 are symbols? What does each symbol stand for? • What is happening in the cartoon? • What is the cartoonist's message? • Do you agree or disagree with the message? Explain your answer.

  4. Cartoon 1 – “Bush Turns back clock”

  5. Cartoon 2 – “Bush and Michigan affirmative action”

  6. Cartoon 3 – “You must be this tall”

  7. Cartoon 4 – “Supremes on affirmative action”

More Related