1 / 17

Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor

Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor. As of 20091127 vers.A N.Toge. ½. Introduction / Overview (PMs) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091117-ay.docx. Formatted Manuscript on the web? No, only initial draft on web Manuscript in WIP by PMs Remarks ETA?

vinny
Télécharger la présentation

Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091127 vers.A N.Toge

  2. ½. Introduction / Overview (PMs)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091117-ay.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No, only initial draft on web • Manuscript in WIP by PMs • Remarks • ETA? • Classification • Major schedule threat

  3. 3. SB2009 Layout (PM + Paterson)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Layout20091124A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Once but with an open loop • Classification • Somewhat of a concern

  4. 4.1 Parameters (PMs + Toge)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091105A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Remarks • Classification • Unlikely to recuperate into a stand-alone subsection. • Suggest integrate into Intro / Overview

  5. 4.2 Gradient Issues (Yamamoto)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SCRFDraft20091105a.doc • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No, only initial draft on web • Manuscript in WIP by PMs • Remarks • ETA? • Classification • Major schedule threat

  6. 4.3/4 Electron and Positron Sources (Brachmann, Clarke)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Injectors20091121A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Once but w. open loop • Classification • Likely to be OK, pending authors’ timely response

  7. 4.5 Damping Rings (Guiducci)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/DR20091123A.doc • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once • Classification • Likely OK, pending small fixes.

  8. 4.6 RTML (Solyak)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RTML20091122A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once but with open loop • Classification • Perhaps OK, depending on authors’ response

  9. 4.7 ML (Nantista, Fukuda)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/ML20091126A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once but with a semi-open loop • KCS known to be in WIP by authors • Important Comment • Pulse length issue needs to be explained. • Classification • Perhaps OK, pending authors’ timely response

  10. 4.8 BDS (Seryi)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/BDS20091124A.doc • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • Classification • Likely OK, pending small fixes.

  11. 4.9 CFS (Kuchler)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/CFS20091126A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • Classification • Likely OK, pending small touch-ups.

  12. 5. Costing (Garbincius)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Cost20091120A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • More text / tables known to be in WIP by the author. • Classification • Likely OK, pending some guideline clarification by PMs.

  13. 6. Risk Analysis (Ross)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RiskDraft20091105.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Author – Editor iteration? • No • Classification • Major schedule threat

  14. A. Availability Analysis (MCR/Avail)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/AvailDraft20091104.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Author – Editor iteration? • Authors known to be at it. ETA unclear. • Classification • Major schedule threat

  15. Critical Issues • ML length • Path length matching known to be addressed • QWT compensation needs clarification • Energy reserve needs clarification • ML alternate pulsing • Handling of lowE beam in highE beamline needs clarification • Costing Reference • “Starting point” needs clarification • Summary statements need group-wide confirmation

  16. Sections at Risk • Intro/Overview • SRF gradient discussion • Risk analysis • Availability

  17. To Do at DESY Face-to-Face • Triage process • Critical open issues  • Group-wide or semi-group wide discussion and surgery on the spot. • With some follow-up work on subsequent days. • Semi-trivial touch-ups  • Identify issues on the spot. Fixes be applied by the primary authors on the fly. • With some follow-up work on subsequent days if needed. • ~17 subsections x 30 min = 9 hrs .eqv. 1 Full Day + reserve • Time is limited: We need to-the-point and concise-efficient discussion and response. No digressing speech, no tangential commentary, no unproductive ranting, please. • Prep and org for AAP • One quarter day

More Related