1 / 14

EU Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management

This draft provides guidelines for national risk assessments of natural and man-made disasters, focusing on the process and methods for overview. It includes definitions of terms, risk assessment methods, risk mapping techniques, and examples of good practices per hazard. The draft also emphasizes the importance of involving multiple actors, data collection, public consultation, and communication. It encourages the use of available EU research and development results to improve risk assessment and mapping.

violat
Télécharger la présentation

EU Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Draft EU Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management 8th Meeting of Working Group F on Floods 27-28 October 2010 Commission ECHO.C4

  2. Structure of draft • Introduction • Scope and objectives of EU Guidelines • Definition of terms • Process (actors, data, public) • Risk Assessment Methods • Conceptual framework (risk, vulnerability, impacts, matrix) • Risk identification, Risk analysis, Risk evaluation • Uncertainty (sensitivity analysis, precautionary principle) • Cross-border dimension • Methods of Risk Mapping • Annexes with good-practice examples per hazard

  3. Scope and objectives of draft guidelines • For national (inter-regional) risk assessments of natural and man-made disasters • Focus on process and methods for overview • Building on MS and (inter-)regional good practice • Use of available EU R&D results • Only risk assessment and mapping, not: • risk management • capability planning of best prevention measures • monitoring and review; communication of findings

  4. Definition of terms • ISO 31000, 31010, ISO Guide 73 Risk assessment = risk identification + risk analysis + risk evaluation Risk = combining consequences and likelihood of a hazard • UN/ISDR Hazard, Vulnerability, Resilience, Exposure • Multi-risk assessment Interdependency or only coincidence of hazards • Impact = human + economic + environmental + political/social

  5. Impact measurements • Human impacts= number dead + severely injured + permanently displaced • Economic & environmental impact= costs [€] cure/healthcare, emergency measures, restoration of buildings/ infrastructure/ property, cultural heritage etc., cost of environment restoration and other environmental costs (or environmental damage), disruption of economic activity, insurance payouts, indirect economic/social costs, other direct/indirect costs as relevant • Political/social impact= qualitative scale 1-5 E.g.: public order, safety, psychological etc.

  6. Risk Assessment Process • Involvement of many actors • Reach a common understanding • Coordination between government departm. • Make assumptions explicit • Data needs • Public consultation and communication • Wide public consultation to build trust • More awareness, engagement, preparedness

  7. Risk matrix (example) affected people economic & environment political/social

  8. How to capture complex reality ? • Risk scenarios • Risk propagation based on assumptions • “reasonable worst case”, threshold, standard • Bayesian methods and decision trees • Multi-risk assessment • Interdependent risks • Knock-on effects, cascading effects • Challenge is co-ordination and interfacing of different specialised authorities/ agencies

  9. National Risk Identification • Use common approach for risk scenarios: • Hazards with likelihood 1 or more in 100 years • and number of affected people 50 or more • and economic & environmental costs > € 100 million • OR where impacts > 0.6% Gross National Income likelihood of < 1/100 to be considered • OR where likelihood > 1/10 = 3 scenarios per hazard • First: risks in the immediate future • Outcome = listing + brief description

  10. National risk analysis • Natural and man-made hazards • Progressively more use of quantitative empirical evidence • If carried out for the first time consider at least the 20 most important scenarios • Single-risk scenarios and strive to consider also some multi-risk scenarios • It is important for overview of risks in EU to disclose methods of calculation

  11. Methods of risk mapping • Maps available only at smaller scales • Good example: flood mapping (river basins) • Stepwise approach • Spatial distribution (Hazards, Exposure, Vulnerability) • Risks

  12. Other chapters • Uncertainty • sensitivity analysis • precautionary principle • Cross-border dimension of risk assessment • Annexes with best-practice examples per type of hazard

  13. Way forward • Finalise draft • Include detailed MS experience • Reflect contributions of researchers • Create a good interface with other Commission policies • Provide assistance to Member States • Update if necessary • Make overview in 2012 of EU risks

More Related