1 / 18

LNAPL Transmissivity (T n ) Remediation Design, Progress and Endpoints

LNAPL Transmissivity (T n ) Remediation Design, Progress and Endpoints. H 2 A Environmental, Ltd . J. Michael Hawthorne, P.G. mhawthorne@h2altd.com www.h2altd.com September 2010. Outline. Introduction. LNAPL multi-phase fluid mechanics review LNAPL metrics review

violet-mueller
Télécharger la présentation

LNAPL Transmissivity (T n ) Remediation Design, Progress and Endpoints

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LNAPLTransmissivity (Tn)Remediation Design, Progress and Endpoints H2A Environmental, Ltd. J. Michael Hawthorne, P.G. mhawthorne@h2altd.com www.h2altd.com September 2010

  2. Outline Introduction • LNAPL multi-phase fluid mechanics review • LNAPL metrics review • LNAPL transmissivity (Tn) principles • Applicability • Summary

  3. LNAPL at the Pore Scale Multi-Phase Fluid Mechanics Sediment Grains Wetting Fluid (Water) • LNAPL co-exists with water in aquifer pores • LNAPL only partially fills the aquifer pore space • The degree of LNAPL saturation depends upon lithology and fluid properties RTDF 2006 Non-Wetting Fluid (Air or LNAPL) Filling Large Pore Spaces

  4. Ideal vs. Observed LNAPL Saturations Saturation curve height = thickness of mobile LNAPL interval Multi-Phase Fluid Mechanics RTDF 2006

  5. T vs. Tn / Tn vs. Sn Transmissivity (T) for water Unit cross-section, gradient, time Aquifer thickness Single fluid (krwdrops out) LNAPL Transmissivity (Tn) Unit cross-section, gradient, time Mobile LNAPL interval thickness Multi-fluid (krnmatters) “How Much, How Fast” Multi-Phase Fluid Mechanics

  6. Ideal LNAPL Metric LNAPL Metrics • Collective property incorporates: • Aquifer properties (e.g., permeability) • Aquifer type (sand vs. clay) • LNAPL properties (e.g., viscosity) • LNAPL type (condensate vs. crude oil) • Fundamental or characteristic property • Repeatable • Saturation / mass driven • Easy and cheap to measure

  7. Non-Ideal Metrics - Thickness • Same mass exhibits different thicknesses in different soil types • Inconsistent under varying hydrostatic conditions LNAPL Metrics Modified after Kirkman (2009) Modified after RTDF (2006)

  8. Non-Ideal Metrics – Recovery Data • Benefits • Direct measure of remediation performance • Provides predictive data for decline curve analysis LNAPL Metrics • Problems • Strongly affected by system operational settings • Varies by technology – not directly comparable • Can’t be used to predict performance prior to startup

  9. Tn – An Improved Metric LNAPL Metrics

  10. LNAPL Transmissivity (Tn) Transmissivity (Tn) Principles • Analog to aquifer transmissivity • Provides basis for mobility / recoverability analyses • Four measurement methods • Baildown / skimming tests • Recovery data analysis • skimming • Vacuum enhanced skimming • Total fluids pumping • Multi-phase extraction • Physical properties / modeling • Tracer tests • Hydraulic recovery only • Dissolved and vapor phase risk issues are separate

  11. Applicability – Uses for Tn Alternative to laboratory Sn Model calibration parameter Technical impracticability threshold Remediation design parameter Operational progress metric Recovery end point Applicability

  12. Applicability - TI Demonstration Applicability • Technical Impracticability (TI) requires either: • Recovery system data • “Can I please turn it off now?” • Direct recoverability threshold metric • Data from a pilot test and modeling study • “Can I please not turn it on?” • Robust calibration parameter for TI modeling

  13. Applicability – Remediation Design Remediation design parameter Compare different technologies (calibrated model) Technology-specific production curves Predicted rate and total volume decline curve analyses Sustainability Design parameters Equipment sizing Waste management / recycling volumes Design cost-benefit analysis Projected operational lifetime Capital vs. mobile infrastructure Applicability

  14. Applicability – Operational Progress Operational Progress Metric Recovery data decline curve analysis (progress towards endpoint) Non-recovery wells to monitor plume progress to endpoint Applicability

  15. Tn Endpoint Analysis Hydraulic recovery end point (0.3 to 0.8 ft2/day) Applicability (Kirkman 2010)

  16. Tn Endpoint Analysis Applicability

  17. Summary Summary • Tn is an improved metric for hydraulic recoverability • Four calculation methods: • Baildown / manual skimming testing • Recovery data analysis • Physical properties analysis • Tracer testing • Tn use as a metric • Indirectly as a robust model calibration parameter • Directly as a recoverability threshold (0.3-0.8 ft^2/day) • Remediation and Tn • TI threshold • Design parameter • End point for hydraulic recovery

More Related