1 / 17

Presented by József Györkös Secretary of State Ministry of Information Society, Slovenia and

Presented by József Györkös Secretary of State Ministry of Information Society, Slovenia and Paul Verhoef Head of International Aspects Unit DG Information Society, EC. EU Membership Candidate Countries in co-operation with European Commission: The JHLC (Joint High Level Committee).

virgo
Télécharger la présentation

Presented by József Györkös Secretary of State Ministry of Information Society, Slovenia and

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presented by József GyörkösSecretary of StateMinistry of Information Society, Slovenia and Paul Verhoef Head of International Aspects Unit DG Information Society, EC

  2. EU Membership Candidate Countries in co-operation with European Commission: The JHLC (Joint High Level Committee) • Aim: To achieve positive action based on a strong political commitment to ensure that the candidate countries use the full potential offered by the Information Society and avoid a digital divide with the EU. • The eEurope+ 2003 initiative mirrors the priority objectives and targets of the EU’s eEurope action plan • The EU candidate countries are faced with enormous challenges in attempt to catch up with the development of a knowledge-based economy while the process of transformation from a planned to an open market economy is taking place at the same time as accession to the European Union.

  3. The objective of this first progress report • give an overview of the actions undertaken by the candidate countries since the adoption of the eEurope+ Action Plan; • establish a first baseline of available indicators so that they can be used to measure progress in the next phase; • compare the relative position of the candidate countries with respect to the general EU situation; and • draw an initial set of conclusions based on the above. ! • The guidelines used for data collection: • data should be recent in order to be relevant and the agreed data measurement point is December 2001; • data should be consistent with the data collected and the methodologies used under the eEurope2002 action plan, as far as possible; • data should be cross-checked with existing public and private sources as far as available and possible; • data should be compared with relevant EU figures, usually an EU average, EU high, and EU low, in order to allow a first benchmark of the situation.

  4. General observation Action must be taken upon several fronts at the same time although there are some complex interactionsbetween them. For example, encouraging the public to make the investment in the equipment that provides Internet access is difficult if there is no digital content in the national language whereas the development of digital content and services is a risky commercial proposition when the potential market is limited to an insignificant potential customer base. However, there is clear recognition that many parallel actions are the only way to make progress.

  5. Data Collection and Analysis • The collection of data for Information Society indicators and the application of an agreed methodology of collection and analysis is a challenge worldwide. • In the context of eEurope+ it has been agreed to use a variety of techniques to collect and analyse data. • The data is sometimes complemented by commercially available data or data from other public sources like the international institutions (International Telecommunications Union (ITU), United Nations (UN), World Bank, OECD)

  6. The Legal and Policy Framework Harnessing the potential of the knowledge based economy can only be achieved on the basis of a responsive legal framework that takes account of the challenges posed by an essentially borderless, internet-based information and communications environment.

  7. Infrastructure and Affordable Access It is vital that citizens, business, and government have access to modern communications networks and the services available over these networks. There is a basic need to ensure that all citizens are offered the possibility of affordable communications services so that info-exclusion can be avoided.

  8. Capabilities and Skills A Europe of Knowledge is now widely recognised as an irreplaceable factor for social and human growth and as anindispensable component to consolidate and enrich European citizenship.

  9. Stimulating Usage Electronic commerce is developing in the candidate countries and strong impacts on industry and service organisationpatterns, as well as on their business models, are to be expected and supported. eGovernment services are a strong driver for the development of e-commerce

  10. There is very little data available at the moment on the usage of eCommerce in the candidate countries. However, progress made in the provision of on-line government services is quite remarkable.

  11. Conclusions • clear and tangible commitment to implementation of the Information Society • considerable progress in implementation of regulatory and policy framework • great strides in basic access to communications • household penetration blocked by high access costs and costs of PC’s • need for effective, properly enforced regulatory framework to increase competitive supply and decrease access costs • still low penetration of computers in schools: need for extra attention to e-education in general • need to build out public access points as an important means of Internet access • significant progress in the provision of public on-line e-government services • need to increase capacity of national statistical offices and research institutions • there remain considerable differences between candidate countries

  12. Presented by József GyörkösSecretary of StateMinistry of Information Society, Slovenia and Paul Verhoef Head of International Aspects Unit DG Information Society, EC

More Related