1 / 24

The Ethical Challenges of Technology in Social Work: Part One

Presenter : Mary E. Garrison, LCSW, ACSW Associate Professor of Social Work, Millikin University NASW Illinois Board Member, East Central District Chair. The Ethical Challenges of Technology in Social Work: Part One. Tweet us at #NASWIL.

vivian
Télécharger la présentation

The Ethical Challenges of Technology in Social Work: Part One

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presenter: Mary E. Garrison, LCSW, ACSW Associate Professor of Social Work, Millikin University NASW Illinois Board Member, East Central District Chair The Ethical Challenges of Technology in Social Work: Part One Tweet us at #NASWIL

  2. Objectives: Gain an understanding and provide reminders of • Ethics/Code of Ethics Review • NASW Code of Ethics: Practical Application • Implications of Technology in Clinical Practice • Tools: • Social Media/Technology Policy Development • NASW & ASWB Standards for Technology

  3. Values in Tension

  4. Code of Ethics • Purpose: • Offer guidance and professional standards • Improve practice & promote accountability • Protect the public • Essential tools for practice: • NASW Code • Other Professional Codes • Limitations

  5. Areas of Risk • Client Rights • Informed Consent • Competence & Service Delivery • Confidentiality • Technology

  6. Technology • Social Media: • Facebook • LinkedIn • Twitter • Skype • Smart Phones: internet • Cell phones: texting • Email

  7. Benefits • Mobility/Accessibility • Clients • Clinicians • Connection • Cost-effectiveness • Interactivity • Instant support Challenges • Negatively impacted relationships • Confidentiality Violations • Conflict of Interest • Legal issues • Documentation

  8. Applicable SW Ethical Standards • 1.03e: “Social workers who provide services via electronic media…..” • 1.06a: “Social workers should be alert to and avoid conflicts of interest that interfere with the exercise of professional discretion and impartial judgment.” (NASW Code, 2008) • 1.06c: “Social workers should not engage in dual or multiple relationships with clients or former clients….” • 1.07a: “Social workers should respect clients’ right to privacy

  9. :Applicable SW Ethical Standards • 1.07i: “Social workers should not discuss confidential information in any setting unless privacy can be ensured.” • 2.01a: “Social workers should treat colleagues with respect….” • 2.01b: “Social workers should avoid unwanted negative criticism of colleagues in communication….” • 4.03: “Social workers should not permit their private conduct to interfere with their ability to fulfill their professional responsibilities.” (NASW Code, 2008)

  10. NASW & ASWB Standards for Technology • Ethics and Values • Access • Cultural Competence and Vulnerable Populations • Technical Competencies

  11. NASW & ASWB Standards for Technology • Regulatory Competencies • Identification and Verification • Privacy, Confidentiality, Documentation and Security • Risk Management

  12. NASW & ASWB Standards for Technology • Practice Competencies: • Advocacy and Social Action • Community Practice • Administrative Practice • Clinical Competencies • Research • Supervision • Continuing Education

  13. Social Media/Technology Policies • Essential for practice • Share with clients upon intake • Must be carefully created addressing: • Policy overview and understanding • All forms of technology

  14. Social Media/Technology Policies • Social networking • Search engines • Email • Cell/smart phones/texting • Skype • Location-based services • Business/Consumer Review Sites

  15. Presenter: Mary E. Garrison, LCSW, ACSW Associate Professor of Social Work, Millikin University NASW Illinois Board Member, East Central District Chair The Ethical Challenges of Technology in Social Work: Part TWO Tweet us at #NASWIL

  16. Scenario for Discussion • #1: Several social workers posted “mean-spirited” and “derogatory” comments about other agency staffers on a social networking site. The social workers assumed that their privacy settings were set to prevent general access to their comments. They did not realize that some network participants had not set their privacy settings properly and that several of the unprofessional comments were now circulating on the networking site. (Reamer, 2011)

  17. Scenario for Discussion • #2: A social worker had just discovered that one of his clients had visited his wife’s social networking site. Coincidentally, the social worker’s client and the social worker’s wife were high school classmates nearly 20 yrs ago and had just reconnected via social networking. Neither person knew of the others connection to the social worker. When the client visited his former classmate’s networking site, he was able to obtain a great deal of personal information about the social worker and saw casual photos of him as well. (Reamer, 2011)

  18. Scenario for Discussion • #3: A social worker in private practice created a Facebook page. The social worker has been providing counseling services to a client who struggles with anxiety and borderline personality disorder. The client become obsessed with the social worker and was determined to find out information about the social workers personal life. The client found the social workers Facebook page and was able to access personal photos and information and then left explicit information related to the site on the social worker’s voicemail system. (Reamer, 2011)

  19. Scenario for Discussion • #4: Alex is a social worker for a non-profit agency that provides services for young adults, ages 18 to 21 years old. An issue of concern for the agency is frequent missed appointments. As one means of addressing this issue, the director wants to list the agency as a “check in” site on Foursquare. She believes the social game play aspect of the site is a way to engage the youthful population that is served, as well as increase visibility for the agency. continued on next slide…….

  20. Scenario for Discussion • #4 Continued: As she explained to the staff, users of Foursquare, a geo-location social networking site, can “check in” while visiting a venue by accessing the app on a mobile device. Each check-in rewards users with points and or “badges.” The director hopes that incentivizing visits to the agency through this social networking site will result in greater compliance with appointments. She tells the staff that a client’s use of Foursquare would be completely voluntary as would be the decision to disclose his or her whereabouts. (Chernack, 2012)

  21. Scenario for Discussion • #5: Nicole is a social worker at a children’s hospital. The hospital has an active social media presence on several platforms including Facebook and Twitter. The purpose of the hospital’s use of social media is multi-fold: to engage in consumer outreach; promote hospital events; disseminate health information; provide support, engage in fundraising, and create an online health care community. Another feature of the hospital’s use of social media is to promote its services by providing a section on its Facebook page for patients and patient’s families to “share their story.” Nicole has worked with many parents who decided to post accounts of their children’s medical condition and the treatment that was provided. (Chernack, 2012)

  22. Scenario for Discussion • #6: Sydney is a recent MSW graduate who works in the psychiatric unit of a large medical center. A young man was admitted through the emergency room for an apparent overdose that was a possible suicide attempt. The admitting physician requests her help in locating information about the patient who was brought in by ambulance after being found unconscious in a public place. She suggests that Sydney search for the individual on Facebook and Twitter. She explains that she needs help in determining if the patient made any suicidal statements and if there are any factors that are mentioned that would facilitate his care. (Chernack, 2012)

  23. References • Beckett, C. & Maynard, A. (2005). Values & ethics in social work: an introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications • Dolgoff, R. Loewenberg, F.M. & Harrington, D. (2005). Ethical decisions for social work practice. 7th edition. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. • Kolmes, K. , Psy.D. – Social Media Policy – 4/26/13 (www.drkkolmes.com) • NASW News: It’s ‘Better to Be Informed’ About Tech Tools, M. Malamud, 6, 2011. • NASW Code of Ethics, 2008, NASW.

  24. References • NASW/ASWB Standards for Technology in Social Work Practice, 2005 • Chernack, K.B., DSW, LCSW-R, Update, Vol. 36, No. 4, Summer 2012, pp. 8-9, 26. National Association of Social Workers New York Chapter. • Young, T.B., LCSW. Facebook: Ethical and Clinical Considerations. www.socialworker.com, 10/25/2013. • Reamer, F.G. (2013). Social Work in a Digital Age: Ethical and Risk Management Challenges. National Association of Social Workers.

More Related