1 / 14

Instructional Focus Document Study (Part 4 of Implementation Guide)

Instructional Focus Document Study (Part 4 of Implementation Guide). Region 18 ESC TOT 2010. Objectives. Pre-assess the implementation of the Instructional Focus Document using the CSCOPE Implementation Rubric

waldo
Télécharger la présentation

Instructional Focus Document Study (Part 4 of Implementation Guide)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Instructional Focus Document Study(Part 4 of Implementation Guide) Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  2. Objectives • Pre-assess the implementation of the Instructional Focus Document using the CSCOPE Implementation Rubric • Use the IFD to identify the cognitive specificity as well as the content specificity for the TEKS statements • Use the IFD to recognize instructional discrepancies through self-reflection Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  3. Pre-assessment: Implementation of Instructional Focus Document CSCOPE Implementation Rubric Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  4. Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  5. A Closer Look at Specificity Cognitive and Content Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  6. Specificity • Cognitive Specificity • Level at which students are expected to perform to adequately meet standard • Determined by verbs in knowledge and skills statements and student expectations • Content Specificity • Content items that students must demonstrate at appropriate cognitive level to adequately meet standard • Determined from TEA publications, released assessment items, TEA study guides, and content area toolkits VERBS Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  7. Instructional Discrepancies The Missing, Underdeveloped, and Extraneous Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  8. Identifying Instructional Discrepancies • Missing: Something in the content specificity that is not being addressed for the appropriate length of time or not being addressed at all • Extraneous: Something that is being taught that is not in either the cognitive or content specificities • Underdeveloped: Cognitive specificity that is not being addressed at the appropriate level or is not being addressed at all Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  9. IRD: Instructional Reconciliation Document Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  10. Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  11. MATH EXAMPLE Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  12. SOCIAL STUDIES EXAMPLE Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  13. Example Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

  14. Confront the Brutal Facts • How many more discrepancies could be identified if the entire district were to be examined over the entire year? • What processes are being coached in my district to prevent discrepancies? • Who is responsible to find solutions to the discrepancies? • How can the process be made sustainable? Region 18 ESC TOT 2010

More Related