1 / 60

This paper

Teachers’ Salaries in Latin America Earnings Gaps and Their Evolution at the turn of the 20th century Alejandra Mizala and Hugo Ñopo. This paper. What is this paper about?

wan
Télécharger la présentation

This paper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teachers’ Salaries in Latin America Earnings Gaps and Their Evolution at the turn of the 20th centuryAlejandra Mizala andHugo Ñopo

  2. This paper What is this paper about? • To what extent are teachers’ earnings below (or above) those of their peers? (with a particular emphasis on : “who are their peers?”) • What role do their socio-demographic characteristics play? • How are these differences distributed? • How these differences evolved? How do we do it? Methodology • Harmonized and comparable measures for a group of countries in the region • Matching and a decomposition that compares only individuals with the same characteristics (Ñopo, 2008) • A more precise comparison of teachers and their peers

  3. This paper (2) • Teachers’ underpayment is more pronounced among males, older workers, household heads, part-timers, informal workers, those who work in the private sector, and among those with complete tertiary education. • The earnings gaps decreased during last decade, especially for preschool and primary teachers, females, younger workers, and part-timers Findings? Insights? • The extent to which teachers are underpaid is stronger than what has been previously reported in the literature. • Important role for education and part-time work. • Cross country heterogeneity. • Job schedules and job tenure (that is, larger vacations and more job stability) also play an important role (compenssting differentials)

  4. The Literature: Mixed Evidence • Psacharopoulos et al. (1996). 12 countries LA circa 1989. Mixed evidence • Liang (1999). 12 countries LA circa 1995. Mixed evidence: BRA, ECU ↓; BOL, CHI, PAR = • Hernani (2005). 17 countries LA circa 2000. Teachers ↑ 25% (except in Brasil) • Argentina, Bolivia, Guatemala, México, Perú (fuera de Lima): teachers ↑. • Chile: M: teachers ↓. F: teachers ↑.

  5. Teachers’ Salaries in Latin America. How Much are They (under or over) Paid?

  6. This paper: 9 countries (9 household surveys)

  7. Populations of interest: school teachers and other professionals and technicians

  8. Comparing apples and oranges

  9. Descriptive statistics: the sociodemographic profile

  10. Descriptive statistics: the sociodemographic profile

  11. Relative earnings: Average school teachers’ hourly earnings equal to 100 for each country. Teachers earn on average more than their peers In Nicaragua teachers earn on average slightly more than half of what their peers earn

  12. Relative earnings

  13. Relative earnings

  14. The Main Counterfactual Question What would the distribution of earnings for teachers be, in the case that their individual characteristics follow the distribution of the characteristics for their peers? → Matching on characteristics

  15. The Matching Algorithm • Result: A sample of matched teachers and their peers with the same distribution of observable individual characteristics (but not necessarily the same distribution of earnings).

  16. This Matching Approach is…Ñopo (2008) A non-parametric alternative to B-O decompositions that has advantages in terms of: • Simplicity Avoiding the estimation of earnings equations • Flexibility It “contains” all possible propensity scores • Identification/Correct specification Recognizing that the supports of empirical distributions of characteristics do not completely overlap (the failure to recognize this leads to an overestimation of the unexplained component of the wage gap) • Information Allowing us to compute directly the distribution of the unexplained effects, not just the average

  17. Advantages/Disadvantages • It is not necessary to estimate earnings equations (no functional form assumption) • Better assessment. The traditional approach seems to deliver biased results when the differences in supports are not taken into account • Once the matching has been done, it is straightforward to: • Explore the distribution of the unexplained wage gap • Explore not only wage gaps but also gaps for other labor market outcomes (participation, unemployment, unemployment spells, segregation) • Curse of Dimensionality. The method does not allow us to use too many explanatory variables. • It does not take into account selection into the labor markets

  18. The earnings gaps: school teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  19. The earnings gaps: pre-school and elementary teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  20. The earnings gaps: secondary teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  21. What about the differences across countries?

  22. The earnings gaps: school teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  23. The earnings gaps: pre-school and elementary teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  24. The earnings gaps: secondary teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  25. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  26. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  27. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  28. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  29. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  30. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  31. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  32. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  33. Distribution of the unexplained differences

  34. Distribution of the unexplained differences (1)

  35. Distribution of the unexplained differences (2)

  36. Distribution of the unexplained differences (3)

  37. Distribution of the unexplained differences (4)

  38. Distribution of the unexplained differences (5)

  39. The gap is still important when considering job-break periods

  40. Tenure is a differentiating factor

  41. Particularly in the public sector

  42. And the way teachers’earnings evolve with tenure is more “plain”

  43. Evolution of Teachers’ Salaries in Latin America at the turn of the 20th century

  44. This paper: 7 countries (14 household surveys)

  45. Descriptive statistics: the sociodemographic profile

  46. Descriptive statistics: the sociodemographic profile

  47. Relative earnings: Average school teachers’ hourly earnings equal to 100 for each country.

  48. The earnings gaps: pre-school and elementary teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  49. The earnings gaps: pre-school teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

  50. The earnings gaps: secondary teachers vs. other professionals and technicians

More Related