1 / 67

INTEGRITI SEKTOR AWAM: ANCAMAN RASUAH & CARA MENANGANINYA

INTEGRITI SEKTOR AWAM: ANCAMAN RASUAH & CARA MENANGANINYA. Dato’ Akhbar Satar 0172560811 akhbar.satar@gmail.com. TI definition of corruption. ‘Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain’. Definition of Bribery. “ Giving or accepting gratification”

waneta
Télécharger la présentation

INTEGRITI SEKTOR AWAM: ANCAMAN RASUAH & CARA MENANGANINYA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTEGRITI SEKTOR AWAM: ANCAMAN RASUAH & CARA MENANGANINYA Dato’ AkhbarSatar 0172560811 akhbar.satar@gmail.com

  2. TI definition of corruption ‘Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain’

  3. Definition of Bribery “ Giving or accepting gratification” ( Section 16 & 17 MACC Act 2009)

  4. Penalty of Corruption • Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 20 years and • Fine not less than 5 times the sum or value of the gratification or RM10,000.00, whichever is higher fine not exceeding RM100,000.00 or imprisonment not exceeding 10 years or both

  5. When evaluating one’s goals and objectives, vital question must be asked: What is your highest aspiration? • A: Wealth • B: Fame • C: Knowledge • D: Popularity • F: Integrity

  6. If integrity is second to any of the alternatives, then it is subject to sacrifice in situations where a choice must be made. • Such situations will inevitably occur in every person’s life.

  7. CAUSES OF CORRUPTION: A CRIMINOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE • Hedonistic • Social Bond • Social Process • Individual vs Systemic • Routine Activity Theory • Fraud Triangle

  8. RED FLAGS • Goes Home late : (first one in, last one out)

  9. RED FLAGS • Employee lifestyle changes: Big Spender- expensive cars, jewelry, buy or renovate homes, clothes ( 43% ACFE 2012)

  10. RED FLAGS • Financial Problem: these may be an indication of drugs, alcohol, gambling, or just fear of losing the job (36% ACFE 2012)

  11. RED FLAGS • Too close to the Clients or Vendors

  12. RED FLAGS • Volunteers for Extra Responsibilities – anager Doing Subordinate Level Work

  13. RED FLAGS • Too Relied on Employee

  14. RED FLAGS • Volunteers for Extra Responsibilities – anager Doing Subordinate Level Work

  15. RED FLAGS • Has Technical Skill to Pull Off the Scheme Secretly

  16. No Vacation & Rejected Promotion

  17. Watch Out for The Most Decent staff

  18. Facts & Figures

  19. Global Integrity Crisis Barry Salzberg • In a survey reported byForbes.com, 38% of teens polled feeling that they needed to cheat in order to get ahead. • Barry Salzberg, CEO of Deloitte stated • “we in business can no longer assume that • employees come to us equipped with a fully • functioning moral code.”

  20. Asia Pacific: • Integrity Crisis • The survey showed that 40 % of the youths in Asia Pacific were willing to accept bribes if they had the opportunity. • Mr. Srirak • Regional Director- Asia Pacific • Transparency International – Berlin • November 2013

  21. Integrity Crisis in Malaysia • The survey conducted by (UKM) showed that 30.5% of the students were willing to accept bribes if they had the power and the opportunity. UKM- MACC

  22. Asia-Pacific Fraud Survey Report Series 2013 Likely to take shortcuts to meet targets when economy times tough Malaysia: 54% Indonesia

  23. Bribe Payers Survey 2012 • 3000 executives • 13 sectors • 30 countries By Sector 35 % : Telecommunications 37 % : Utilities 38 % : Public works contracts and Construction 50% Malaysia: Lost Business Due to Competitor paid Bribe

  24. World Economic Forum • Economic loss due to corruption • Add 10% of total cost in doing business • Up to 25% to the cost of procurement contracts in developing countries

  25. The World Bank • Economic loss due to corruption • Worldwide 2.9 trillion • Reduce the country’s growth • rate by 2 - 4%

  26. The Association of • Certified Fraud Examiners • ( Report to Nation 2012) • An organization loses 5% of its revenues to fraud each year • 2011 Gross World Product, this translates to global fraud loss of more than $3.5 trillion.

  27. Royal Malaysian Police RM1.1 billion has been lost through commercial crimes reported so far in 2013, with cheatingcases and criminalbreach of trust (CBT) making up the bulk of losses . Dato Syed Ismail Syed  Director, Federal Commercial Crime Investigation Department

  28. This is 1 billion

  29. This is 1 trillion

  30. This is also 1 trillion Worldwide Corruption is 3.5 Trillion ?

  31. The value of RM 1 billion With RM 1 billion you can build: 667 kilometer rural roads 35

  32. The value of RM 1 billion 6,667 kilometer kampung roads 36

  33. The value of RM 1 billion 500 bridges 37

  34. The value of RM 1 billion With RM 1 billion you can build: 90 primary schools 38

  35. Measuring corruption

  36. THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX (CPI)

  37. THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013 IS: A global(177 countries/territories) aggregate Index(up to 13 different data sources) capturing perceptions(experts/business people) of corruption(abuse of power for private gain) in the public sector(public officials and institutions)

  38. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX The perceived levels of public sector corruption in 177 countries / territories around the world. GLOBAL 70% of countries score less than 50 out of 100. 43 is the average score worldwide.

  39. CPI 2013: THE TOP Denmark and New Zealand tie for first place with scores of 91, helped by strong access to information systems and rules governing the behaviour of those in public positions.

  40. CPI 2013: THE BOTTOM Afghanistan, North Korea and Somalia once again cling to the bottom rung of the index. In these countries the lack of leaders who are accountable and effective public institutions underscore the need to take a much stronger stance against corruption.

  41. COUNTRIES WITH SIMILAR SCORES

  42. CPI 2001 - 2013 : MALAYSIA

  43. SCORES OF ASEAN COUNTRIES

  44. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX

  45. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX

  46. CPI 2013 vs GDP Per Capita 2012 $99,558 $56,210 $10,381 $620

More Related