1 / 16

Connectors, Vias and Stubs (some semi-random observations)

Connectors, Vias and Stubs (some semi-random observations). After material loss effects, connector design and especially via transition design has the largest effect upon end-to-end system performance. Via transitions can contain significant stubs which can effect signal quality and bandwidth.

warner
Télécharger la présentation

Connectors, Vias and Stubs (some semi-random observations)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Connectors, Vias and Stubs(some semi-random observations) • After material loss effects, connector design and especially via transition design has the largest effect upon end-to-end system performance. • Via transitions can contain significant stubs which can effect signal quality and bandwidth. • These stub form ¼ wave resonant structures that have a severe impact on bandwidth within the region of resonance.  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  2. Via Stubs Connection from the connector PTH to the backplane trace is made at the via transition. Most transition types leave an open via stub. This stub forms a high quality quarter wave resonator whose resonant frequency is a function of its length and material properties.  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  3. Via Stub SimulationsFR-4 vs. RO4350 for 30-inch System RO4350 with good via design Poor via transition design can cause unwanted stubs. These stubs for ¼ wave resonators, which reduce and limit system bandwidth. Even though Rogers 4350 material has superior loss properties over FR-4, poor via transition design can negate this performance advantage. FR-4 with good via design RO4350 with poor via design causes resonance  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  4. Via Stub Reduction • Methods for reduction of via stub resonators: • Preferential routing to reduce stub length. • Uses lowest routing layers. (Lowest cost with performance relative to stub length.) • Counter-boring. • Removes unwanted stubs by controlled depth drilling as a final manufacturing step. (Additional cost and manufacturing loss with similar performance to buried vias. Difficult to test!) • Buried Via Technology • Additive laminate and laser drilling. (Highest cost with highest potential performance.) • Reduction of Parasitic Capacitance • Pad removal • Anti-pad enlargement  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  5. Insertion Loss vs. Via Stub LengthFR-4 Via stub 0 to 150 mils. 8 mil 30-inch trace. Longer stub Note: Internal stubs within connectors will also limit performance in this way.  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  6. Insertion Loss vs Via ImpedanceRogers 4350 Via Impedance 35 to 50 ohms. 8 mil 30-inch trace. Higher capacitance Increased via capacitance leads to increased impedance. These effectively load the via stub structure and decrease the resonant frequency. The reduction in resonant frequency is seen in a loss in system bandwidth.  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  7. BGA Breakout Via Coupling Simulations • CST Microwave was used to perform detailed modeling and simulation of via breakout region under BGA devices. • 3D Finite Integration Technique time-domain field solver and simulator with bandwidth well beyond 50 GHz. • Field solver transforms time domain simulations into frequency domain using Discrete Fourier Transform of system stimulated with a Gaussian pulse.  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  8. Via GeometrySide View  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  9. Via GeometryPerspective View  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  10. Via GeometryTop View  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  11. Time Domain Gaussian Pulse Simulation  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  12. S41 (Insertion Loss)  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  13. S42 (Crosstalk)  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  14. S43 (Crosstalk)  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  15. S11 (Return Loss)  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

  16. FEXT Connector with Vias With two coupled vias. 1:1 Signal:Ground With and without breakout vias. Connector only. Via-to-via crosstalk can easily exceed connector crosstalk, when signal vias are not well referenced and isolated by ground vias.  2002 Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

More Related