1 / 7

Understanding Bias in Target Ratings after Priming Effects

Explore findings on prejudice inevitability based on activation of categories and stereotypes, individual vs social self, anger following insults, Kelley's attribution theory, attitude change models, induced compliance effects, and physiological evidence for cognitive dissonance.

watson
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Bias in Target Ratings after Priming Effects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ratings of an ambiguous target following priming Source: Based on Lepore, L. and Brown, R., Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 1997, 72, 275–287.

  2. The individual and social self Source: Based on Abrams, D., Marques, J.M., Brown, N.J. and Henson, M., Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78, 911.

  3. Anger following insult to the individual or collective self Source: Based on Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C. and Graetz, K., In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or collective primacy? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 76, 13.

  4. Kelley’s theory of attribution

  5. The elaboration likelihood model of attitude change

  6. Effects of induced compliance Source: Based on data from Festinger, L. and Carlsmith, J.M., Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 58, 203–210.

  7. Physiological evidence for cognitive dissonance Source: Based on data from Coyle, R.T. and Cooper, J., Dissonance arousal: Physical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, 782–791.

More Related