1 / 35

We could teach vulnerable children to read.

We could teach vulnerable children to read. Richard L Allington, PhD University of T ennessee. Much evidence indicates that some teachers literally teach every child to read while others are far less successful.

wattan
Télécharger la présentation

We could teach vulnerable children to read.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. We could teach vulnerable children to read. Richard L Allington, PhD University of Tennessee

  2. Much evidence indicates that some teachers literally teach every child to read while others are far less successful. • Stuhlman & Pianta (2009) report that approximately 20% of 1st grade teachers offer high-quality reading lessons and 20% offer very low quality lessons. Classroom lessons matter…

  3. Sanders (1994) found that 3 consecutive years with effective teachers resulted in reading achievement 50 percentile ranks higher than 3 years with less effective teachers. • Effective teachers = 80%ile • Less effective teachers= 30%ile Effective teachers…

  4. Gates (2011) notes that the difference between the most and least effective teachers in a building are twice as large the the difference between the most and least effective schools in the nation. • He suggests parents search for effective teachers rather than effective schools. Effective teachers or effective schools?

  5. Vellutino, Scanlon, et al (2007) found… • In 4 elementary schools 100% of vulnerable readers were reading on or above grade level at the end of 3rd grade. • In 4 schools fewer than 60% of the vulnerable readers were reading grade level at the end of 3rd grade. Schools differ…

  6. Not clear from the study just what teachers do differently in the 4 more successful schools, because classroom instruction was not observed. • But which schools these at-risk kids attended mattered in asking how many kids could be reading on grade level. • The 4 schools suggest that the answer is all kids could be reading on grade level. Schools matter…

  7. "Thus, addressing instructional problems at the classroom level is critically important and would be a vital component of any preventive model…High-quality supplemental instruction should not be a substitute for high-quality classroom instruction and one should complement the other." (Scanlon, et al, p. 211- 212) Instructional coherence….

  8. However, in the majority of schools “planned fragmentation” is the model in place • Not a coherent and rich reading plan. • So vulnerable children have to learn to deal with incoherent curriculum. Coherence or Fragmentation?

  9. The key to effective classroom reading lessons is teacher expertise. • Expertise in: • Classroom management • Effective literacy instruction • Managing literate conversations Teacher expertise (or not)…

  10. Scanlon, et al (2010) and McGill-Franzen, et al (1999;2010) both report 30-60 hours of professional development is powerful in changing reading lessons and reading outcomes. • Scanlon, et al found PD more effective than expert 1 to 1 tutoring at addressing the needs of struggling readers. • McGill-Franzen found PD developed K teachers who brought students to grade level reading skills in high-poverty schools. Teachers matter…

  11. Improving the quality of early literacy instruction is the best way to improve student outcomes. • Developing the expertise of every teacher is the best way to improve early literacy instruction. Improving early literacy lessons…

  12. Developing teacher expertise seems to be the only proven strategy for teaching all vulnerable children to read. • Few schools have adopted massive and rich professional development for staff as their intervention design. Is PD your school’s intervention?

  13. Access to high-quality early literacy lessons is critical to school and life success. • Four years of struggling damns a child to a lifetime of struggles. We can do better…

  14. 90% of children reading on grade level by the end of 3rd grade graduate high school on time. • This regardless of the SES, neighborhood, or parents of the child. • Children from low-income families who are not reading on grade level by the end of 3rd grade are 13 times as likely to drop out as those children who do read on grade level. Annie Casey Foundation…

  15. Schools have, then, 4 years (K-3) to teach all children to read proficiently. • 4 years is actually a lot of time, same number of years needed to graduate high school or college. • What do schools need to do then? Four long years…

  16. Schools need to begin attributing difficulties with learning to read to the school’s failure to provide extensive, intensive, and expert reading instruction. • Not all children find learning to read an easy task and it is these children who need the extensive, intensive, and expert reading instruction. Extensive, intensive and expert…

  17. “There is now considerable evidence, from recent intervention studies, that reading difficulties in most beginning readers are not caused by biologically based cognitive deficits intrinsic to the child, but may in fact be related to the opportunities provided for children learning to read.” p. 378 Vellutino, F. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2005). Developmental dyslexia. In M. S. C. Hulme (Ed.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp 362-378). Malden, MA: Blackwell Limited opportunities…

  18. No continued reliance on mythological causes of reading problems. • By mythological I mean… • Learning disability • Attention deficit disorder • Dyslexia Mythologies…

  19. Vulnerable children have a right to experience the same higher quality reading lessons that achieving readers experience. • All children have a right to effective reading lessons. • Effective lessons from their classroom teachers. The right to effective lessons…

  20. Our beliefs about vulnerable pupils may limit our efforts. • We provide those kids with reading lessons very different from the reading lessons our kids get (e.g.,Valli & Chambliss, 2010). The problem may be us…

  21. More oral reading, less silent reading. • More hard reading, less high-success reading. • More low level questions, less literate conversation. • More skills work, less reading activity. • More worksheets, less reading activity. • More testing, less reading activity. What vulnerable children are more likely to get…

  22. What kids do during reading lessons predicts what kids learn during reading lessons. • Let’s try a simple but research-based design. Redesigning reading lessons…

  23. Will read texts they have selected. • Will read texts accurately. • Will read texts they understand. • Will talk to peers about their reading. • Will write text that is meaningful. • Will listen to a fluent adult read aloud. Every day every child…

  24. Eliminate all those activities that research indicates are largely a waste of time. • Worksheets • Round robin interruptive oral reading • Low-level interrogations • Isolated skills lessons and skills tests • Fluency tests • Unit tests • Test prep Where to find the time…

  25. In too many classrooms such activities make up the bulk of work done during the school day. • Eliminating wasteful activities provides hours each day for productive activities. • It also provides a source for funding what we need to change ($100,000-$250,000 every year). It’s not that we don’t have the money…

  26. It is the design of lessons where changes need to be made. • It is teacher beliefs that need to change. • It is the nature of the work that needs improvement. • WE can make these changes, kids cannot. It isn’t the kids that are the problem…

  27. Are you up to it? • The students are waiting. It is up to you…

  28. Summer reading setback results from students spending the summer without the opportunity to read. • It is easy access to books they can read and books that they want to read that is the key. Access and choice….

  29. Our latest book…

  30. Schools cannot ignore whether kids have books to read during the summers. • Schools can and must provide access to books that kids want to read. • Not difficult but someone has to take charge.

  31. Distributing 15 books self-selected books every summer eliminated summer reading setback. • Produced as much, or more, reading growth as attending summer school. • At 1/100th of the cost! Summer reading…

  32. If we provide struggling readers with a sufficient amount of effective reading lessons we can eliminate the rich/poor reading achievement gap. • If we ensure all kids from low-income families have easy summer access to books they can read and want to read we can simplify closing the gap. We could, but will we?

  33. Once we have the school day in order we can worry about how students spend their summers. Worry about summers…

  34. 80% of the three-year reading achievement gap at 9th grade comes from summer reading loss (Alexander, et al, 2009) • Small annual losses accumulate over time. • Giving vulnerable children books they can read and want to read was effective as summer school (and far less expensive). Don’t neglect the summer…

More Related