110 likes | 239 Vues
This workshop, led by Steve Latham, provides educators with essential strategies for evaluating internet resources for classroom instruction. With the vastness of information available online, it is crucial to discern quality and reliable sources. Attendees will learn about the significance of selection policies, the potential biases in information, and how to employ evaluation checklists like CARS (Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, Support) to assess web resources effectively. Gain skills to filter out the noise and ensure that students access trustworthy information.
E N D
Winding Your Waythrough the Web Evaluating Internet Resources for the Classroom August 21 & 23, 2001 Steve Latham slatham@shelbyed.k12.al.us
Largest Library Imaginable • More resources than could ever be used • Available from around the world • Available day and night • Not organized in any meaningful way • “Here today – gone today” • Multiple paths to same information • Often confusing – often frustrating
No one is in charge • Inaccurate information found alongside and given an equal footing with accurate information • Growing at a phenomenal rate (Estimated more than 1 billion indexable websites; 133,897,000 hosts) http://www.matrix.net/index.html
Selection • School or public libraries have a selection policy in place • Age-appropriate • Accurate • Non-biased • Good quality • Fill a need of library users
“Bubba” Websites • ANY BUBBA can post a website. • NO ONE has selected the sites on the Internet. • ANYONE can publish whatever they want on their website. • Information does NOT have be accurate. • Information does NOT have to be good quality. • Information may be biased. • Information may be appropriate for only a limited number.
“Evaluating Internet Research Sources” – Robert Harris • Diversity of Information • Information is a Commodity Available in Many Flavors • Information Exists on a Continuum of Reliability and Quality • Screening Information • Pre-evaluation • Select Sources Likely to be Reliable
“Evaluating Internet Research Sources” – Robert Harris • Tests of Information Quality • RELIABLE Information Is Power • Source Evaluation is an Art • The CARS Checklist for Information Quality • Credibility • Accuracy • Reasonableness • Support
“Evaluating Internet Research Sources” – Robert Harris • Credibility • Author’s Credentials • Evidence of Quality Control • Metainformation • Indicators of Lack of Credibility • Accuracy • Timeliness • Comprehensiveness • Audience and Purpose • Indicators of Lack of Accuracy
“Evaluating Internet Research Sources” – Robert Harris • Reasonableness • Fairness • Objectivity • Moderateness • Consistency • World View • Indicators of aLack of Reasonableness • Support • Source Documentation or Bibliography • Corroboration • External Consistency • Indicators of a Lack of Support
“Evaluating Internet Research Sources” – Robert Harris • Living with Information: The CAFÉ Advice • Challenge • Adapt • File • Evaluate
Selected Tutorials On the Web • Evaluation Web Pages: A WebQuest http://mciunix.mciu.k12.pa.us/~spjvweb/evalwebteach.html • Sun Valley High School: Web Evaluation http://www.sunvalleyhighschool.org/webevaluation.htm • ICYouSee: T is for Thinking http://www.ithaca.edu/library/Training/hott.html