160 likes | 167 Vues
Learn about a research project in Nicaragua targeting vulnerable populations with STI/HIV care through competitive vouchers. Explore the impact, success, and scalability of the program. Discover the key lessons learned in developing and expanding this innovative healthcare initiative.
E N D
Anna Gorter Zoyla Segura Esteban Zuñiga Joel Medina ICAS-Nicaragua www.icas.net Scaling upa successful research project to reach vulnerable populations with STI/HIV care through acompetitive voucher schemein Nicaragua Financed by the Dutch Embassy and NOVIB
HIV prevention and STI/HIV care for vulnerable populations • Vulnerable populations have limited access to STI/HIV care because of: • Costs, distance, time • Stigmatizing • Low human and technical quality • Need for client-friendly quality care • However • Accessible quality care is expensive • Limited resources should be targeted
Competitive voucher schemes • Competitive vouchers can target limited resources to vulnerable populations for the provision of clearly defined packages of services, eg. quality STI/HIV care • Competitive vouchers are a type of demand side financing
Demand side financing compared to Supply side financing Demand Side Financing Supply Side Financing Competitive Vouchers Scheme Current System (Inputs) High Consumer empowerment Low Good Targeting Poor High Choice Low/No High Provider Competition Low/No
A document which can be exchanged for defined goods or medical services as a token of payment What is a voucher Example of voucher The voucher empowers the consumer, who can choose among different health care providers to redeem the voucher
Voucher program in Managua • Started as research project to prevent HIV by targeting quality STI care to sex workers (SW) 1995-1999 (female SW, transvestite and glue-sniffers) • Contracts 10-12 clinics through competitive tender • Trains clinic staff • Distributes vouchers at all prostitution sites (2x/year) • Uses protocols: combination of presumptive treatment with zitromax, tests, clinical diagnosis; safe sex education and material; condoms • Pays clinics according to number of SW attended • Monitors quality and only best clinics are retained
Voucher NGO's V O U C H E R V O U C H E R V O U C H E R Agency ICAS V O U C H E R V O U C H V E O R U C H E R Donor/ Government Vulnerable groups Clinics V O U C H E R V Clients & O U C H Partners E R
From research to program • Research project successful in reaching sex workers: • Almost half of sex workers used their voucher • Greatest voucher use by those with the highest STI rates, who are also the poorest, including glue-sniffers • Decrease STIs in sex workers redeeming their voucher, annual reduction of prevalence: • 9% for trichomonas • 8% for gonorrhoea • 16% for syphilis • Its success led researchers to turn project into an operational program
Scaling up the voucher program Scaling up occurred in several phases: • Inclusion of other populations: • Clients/partners of sex workers (1999) • Men who have sex with men (including prisoners) 2001 • Mobile groups: truck-drivers, military (2002) • More services: HIV testing, follow-up HIV + (2001) • Expansion to 3 other departments (2002-2004)
Results over 9 years • > 20 clinics contracted (public, private and NGO) • > 50,000 field contacts (promotion safe sex, STI control; distribution of condoms and vouchers) • ½ of female and ¼ of male vouchers redeemed • > 16,000 medical consultations for STI/HIV care, with 5,600 alone over 2003
Reaching vulnerable groups with STI/HIV care successful • The program could attract difficult-to-reach, vulnerable populations in all departments • Additional self-selection effect: greatest voucher use by those with highest STIs rates (‘super targeting’) • Within the vulnerable groups, the program: • reduced STI rates and increased condom use • Increased access to quality VCT for HIV • Improved follow-up of HIV+ members
Reduction STI’s in sex workers who used a voucher 3 times or more
HIV prevalence: 1991: 0.8% 1996: 1.5% 1997: 1.3% 1999: 2.0% 2000: 0.9% 2002: 0.4% HIV prevalence in sex workers Managua remained low Sex workers in nightclub
Lessons learned in developing program to present scale • Start-up costs were high but declined over time • Setting up is complex, takes time to develop • Uses existing clinics, no need for new services • Mobilizes private sector into STI/HIV care • Uses competition to minimize costs • Obtains quality STI/HIV care because of • Competition and compulsory training of staff • Use of treatment protocols • Retaining only best performing clinics in program
Conclusion • Targeting STI/HIV care through competitive voucher programs is highly effective in reaching vulnerable groups • Once established, the program is easy to run. • Furthermore it proofed easy to scale up: • to other vulnerable populations groups, • to include other priority services e.g. HIV testing • to other departments of Nicaragua
More information: www.icas.net agorter@ibw.com.ni