1 / 7

Mandate

Mandate Paragraph 3 (e) of the JI guidelines: Responsibility of the JISC for the elaboration of the JI PDD form for consideration by the COP/MOP; taking into account the CDM PDD; giving consideration to relevant work of the CDM Executive Board. JISC 03

webb
Télécharger la présentation

Mandate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mandate • Paragraph 3 (e) of the JI guidelines:Responsibility of the JISC for the elaboration of the JI PDD form • for consideration by the COP/MOP; • taking into account the CDM PDD; • giving consideration to relevant work of the CDM Executive Board. • JISC 03 • agreement on a draft JI PDD form and guidelines for its users; • request to the secretariat to prepare a draft PDD form and guidelines for its users for LULUCF projects in consultation with Mr. Goetze on the basis of modifying the draft JI PDD form.

  2. 1. Decision 9/CMP.1, paragraph 4. • Projects under Article 6 aimed at enhancing anthropogenic removals by sinks shall conform to definitions, accounting rules modalities and guidelines under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol, • Decision 16/CMP.1 • IPCC Good Practice Guidance (GPG) for LULUCF. • 2. Draft JI PDD form and guidelines for its users. • 3. CDM-AR-PDD form and guidelines for completing the forms.

  3. Ensure conformity with definitions, accounting rules modalities and guidelines under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol, i.e. GPG for LULUCF. • Specific LULUCF aspects under JI: • LULUCF activities under JI are not restricted to A/R: • Forest management, cropland management, grazing land management and revegetation may be eligible • Maintain consistency with respect to the draft JI PDD form and guidelines for its users. • Allow compatibility with the work from the Executive Board on methodologies for afforestation and reforestation.

  4. Differences with respect to the draft JI PDD form and guidelines for its users: • Changed wording to reflect LULUCF terminology • Indications to the need to apply IPCC good practice guidance for LULUCF • Additional definitions relevant to JI LULUCF projects: • Forest and LULUCF activities • Carbon pools • Elaboration of existing definitions: • Project • Project boundary • Leakage

  5. New sections: • A.4.2. ensures conformity with definition of LULUCF activities as provided in decision 16/CMP.1. • B.2. reflects GPG, assisting in the identification of the carbon pools to be taken into account. • B.3. reflects GHG and assists in the identification of GHG emission sources to be taken into account. • D.1.1 reflects GPG and allows compatibility with CDM methodologies.

  6. Modified sections: • A.4.1.4. emphasises the geographical nature of the project boundary in LULUCF projects. • A.4.6. and A.4.6.1. reflect the aim of LULUCF projects. • B.1. and D.1. give guidance on the obligation to conform with definitions, accounting rules modalities and guidelines under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol. • D.1.2. reflects GPG the aim of LULUCF projects. • E.1. to E.5. reflect the procedure for the calculation of the enhancement of removals by the LULUCF project.

More Related