1 / 11

Dr. Sigurt Vitols Science Center Berlin (WZB)

Dr. Sigurt Vitols Science Center Berlin (WZB). Participation: an asset of Corporate Governance in MNC’s. Does the SE provide an advantage for enterprises and investors?. Presentation prepared for the SEEurope Network Conference, 29-30 November 2004, Brussels. Key Questions for the Study.

wei
Télécharger la présentation

Dr. Sigurt Vitols Science Center Berlin (WZB)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dr. Sigurt Vitols Science Center Berlin (WZB) Participation: an asset of Corporate Governance in MNC’s. Does the SE provide an advantage for enterprises and investors? Presentation prepared for the SEEurope Network Conference, 29-30 November 2004, Brussels

  2. Key Questions for the Study • Internationalization and company change • Resulting challenges for HRM • Workers’ Participation: The Management View • EWC + SE

  3. Study Design • DJ Stoxx 600 • Postal survey of 165 Companies w/ EWC • 63 Replies (38 % Response Rate) • 13 In-depth Interviews • Access to Lift.com Participants

  4. Internationalization at Company Level • Weakening of National HQ vis-a-vis Regional and/or Divisional HQ • Regional Production + Sales Strategies • Product + process standardization • Regional/divisional HRM upgraded • Increased Monitoring by Capital Markets + NGOs • Uneven Process

  5. Examples of Company Change • Centralization at GM Europe HQ/Detroit • BP European HQ in Paris • Devolution of responsibility to divisions (e.g. Degussa, Zeneca) • Centralization of risk management function in financial services

  6. Challenges for European HRM • Understanding national cultural and legal differences • Harmonization of HRM policy which respects national differences • Create “real” corporate culture/identity • Encourage cross-border mobility of employees • Develop truly international management cadre • Implementing European legislation (e.g. timely info for EWC) • “Think globally and act locally” • Increase local control/monitoring w/o increasing bureaucracy • CSR/Sustainability/Code Implementation

  7. European Employee Participation • 2/3 managers see EWCs positively + have plans for improvement • Better communication, acceptance, decisions • Decrease in decision speed • No “country of origin” effect • However: significant minority negative • Near-consensus: no negotiating rights, no strengthened Directive

  8. Some Benefits of EWCs • Upgrading of HR function • Discussion of new topics: strategy, finances, health + safety, training • From information to consultation • Agreements/statements on: • Health and safety • Sustainable development • Social + ethical charters

  9. Enlightened Managers: EWC future role • More confident information conduit • More informed consultative body able to act as a genuine interlocutor • A serious and active partner • A key role in European social dialogue • A brainstorming group • A platform for a constructive social dialogue and wide-ranging communication

  10. Adoption of SE: Wait and See? • 8 %: likely to adopt • 12 %: “unthinkable” • 80 %: “Might be considered but unlikely that it would be adopted” • Key issues: taxation, simplification of corporate structure, financial reporting + transparency, employee representation

  11. Participation + SE: Possible Advantages • Upgrading of HRM function • Improvement in employee communication + motivation, implementation of change • Independent force monitoring management • „New“ issues: CSR, transparency, pension funds • Role for trade unions?

More Related