1 / 6

Hanna F. Pitkin

Hanna F. Pitkin. Hanna F. Pitkin: OBLIGATION AND CONSENT. Consent Theory: sources God, Hobbes, Locke, Rawls Pitkin and the doctrine of “hypothetical consent Methodology What “people really do” Socrates and the Nazi official procedural and substantive criteria What are real choices?.

wei
Télécharger la présentation

Hanna F. Pitkin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hanna F. Pitkin

  2. Hanna F. Pitkin: OBLIGATION AND CONSENT • Consent Theory: sources • God, Hobbes, Locke, Rawls • Pitkin and the doctrine of “hypothetical consent • Methodology • What “people really do” • Socrates and the Nazi official • procedural and substantive criteria • What are real choices?

  3. The use of examples • important that there are lots of different cases • who thinks of consent • not the blacks, the civil disobedient • but Socrates and the official • but the official gives us pause about resting things on consent • Socrates: here he accepts his obligation to remain but he as also disobeyed: how does he know to what he has consented • Cannot be tacit (how would we know) 19 • this cannot be a matter of what the majority thinks (but what the majority thinks a matter to consider • although this can be evidence (20)

  4. How do we assess a government? • Two forms for assessing government • procedural (rules followed) • substantive (people well treated) • BUT: p 44 • idea of the grammar of the word ‘obligation’ • suppose I ask why are you ever obliged to obey even legitimate authority --- traditional consent theory takes this for granted: confuses the self assumption of contract with the self assumption of obligation (23)

  5. JOHN RAWLS and STANLEY CAVELL

  6. The “grammar” of consent • The case of promising • The place of promising: Rawls and Cavell • Deontology • Right intentions • Teleology • What is a duty to do • “We” and our obligations • who is to say?

More Related