550 likes | 696 Vues
imaginary phone— learning by transfer. s ean g ustafson c hristian h olz patrick b audisch. or projector. to achieve ultimate mobility: sacrifice screen limited to gesture-based interaction. gesture pendant [ISWC’00].
E N D
imaginary phone— learning by transfer sean gustafson christian holz patrick baudisch
or projector to achieveultimatemobility: sacrifice screen limited to gesture-based interaction gesture pendant[ISWC’00]
but spatial interaction (pointing) is the interaction style of current devices.
bring spatial interaction back, despite non-visual imaginary interfaces = “touch screen without the screen”
transfer learning 1. users repeatedly performa task usinga physical device
transfer learning 2. this builds up spatial memory, eventuallyallows performing the task without phone
to make this work, we make imaginaryphone mimics the layout of the physical phone
imaginary phone prototype does transfer learning work?
what we used our new camera
main hypothesis: through repeated use of a physical deviceusers learn how to operate the imaginary counterpart
with repeated use of physical phone, usersbuild up spatial memory spatialmemory mapsto the hand on the hand users target accurately learn map target
learn map target 1) users build up spatial memory?
“Do you have an iPhone? (and do you like chocolate?)”
participant experimenter
results results 7 1% % 6 7 % 6 5 % percentage ofcorrectly placed apps apps used D a i l y W e e k l y R a r e l y
✔ learn map target 2) does spatial memory map to the hand?
there was a second condition select on hand select on phone prop
results % % percentage ofcorrectly placed apps
results % % percentage ofcorrectly placed apps
✔ ✔ learn map target 3) on the hand, users target accurately?
select in empty space select on palm
50% more accurate
✔ ✔ ✔ learn map target
if users know 70% of functions…do we need to train them to 100%? no, actually knowledge of a single function gets you started