1 / 32

Laurent Lefèvre INRIA / LIP (UMR CNRS, INRIA, ENS, UCB) laurent.lefevre@inria.fr

Heavy and lightweight dynamic network services: challenges and experiments for designing intelligent solutions in evolvable next generation networks. Laurent Lefèvre INRIA / LIP (UMR CNRS, INRIA, ENS, UCB) laurent.lefevre@inria.fr WAGEN Workshop - Jiuzhaigou - April 8, 2005 -. Challenges.

whitley
Télécharger la présentation

Laurent Lefèvre INRIA / LIP (UMR CNRS, INRIA, ENS, UCB) laurent.lefevre@inria.fr

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Heavy and lightweight dynamic network services: challenges and experiments for designing intelligent solutions in evolvable next generation networks Laurent Lefèvre INRIA / LIP (UMR CNRS, INRIA, ENS, UCB) laurent.lefevre@inria.fr WAGEN Workshop - Jiuzhaigou - April 8, 2005 -

  2. Challenges • Active networks : programmable network equipments which allow deployment of heterogeneous services • in data plan (heavy services) • In control / management plans (lightweight services) • How to urbanize networks with autonomous dynamic services ? • How to efficiently manage such heterogeneous services for providing efficient solutions inside the network ?

  3. Patterns • Robustness • Best effort services • Garanted services • Personnalized • Generic services • Dedicated services (application, user, stream…) • TTL • One-usage service • Persistant services

  4. Roadmap • Urbanization of dynamic network services • Lightweight network functionalities • Cluster-based network equipments • Load balancing strategies for heterogeneous services

  5. Where to map dynamic autonomous network services? • Urbanization is an open problem • Mixes networking aspects with service composition • Access networks • Peering points • Front end of clusters • LAN ?

  6. Service on data path • Proxy mode • Dynamic deployment

  7. Replicated network service • Same service replicated on several network equipments • On the fly deployment with data streams

  8. Distributed network autonomous service • Service composition • Allow pipelined approach • Dealing with fault tolerance / load balancing

  9. Unique service out of the data path • Dedicated equipment (legacy solution) • Requires intelligent forwarding

  10. Distributed service outside the data path • Requires sensors to evaluate cost of multiple fwd operations

  11. Proposing a generic active environment able to handle heterogeneous services : • The Tamanoir project • Supporting requirements of current networks (Gbits)

  12. Tamanoir Architecture : adapted for heterogeneous services • Resources consuming services : distributed storage, streams adaptation, on the fly compression, cryptography… • Services deployment / linked with middleware : reliable multicast… • Middle services : content based routing, QoS... • Light network services : packet marking, QoS… Distributed resources Execution environment Kernel NIC (Programmable)

  13. Active service deployment • From application / middleware • From TAN • From network service Broker

  14. Tamanoir Active Node (TAN) Execution environment

  15. Performance evaluation of middle services

  16. Solution / Problem • Simple Java service in user space can support up to 450 Mbits !  (we eat the ants ! ) • A stand-alone active node is not enough to fully support and apply active service to Gbit streams  • Need to put lightweight network functionalities close to the network • Explore kernel services

  17. Distributed resources Kernel support for active node Execution environment Kernel NIC (Programmable)

  18. Kernel Support • Module inside Linux kernel : using netfilter • Filtering ANEP packets • Allowing packet to cross the active node through the kernel space • Efficiently put ANEP packets inside the service in user space

  19. Netfilter • Protocols define hooks on the packet way inside IP stack • Associate hooks and personalized applications /services NF_IP_POST_ROUTING NF_IP_FORWARD 3 4 1 Routing Routing Local process 2 5 NF_IP_LOCAL_IN NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT

  20. Communication between active service and OS module • A Tamanoir active service : a java part + kernel module • Message control / parameters

  21. Performance evaluation

  22. Solution / Problem • Kernel active services greatly reduce latency for transient packets  • Only applicable to lightweight network functionalities (state, CPU consumption..)  • Reduce portability of active services • What about CPU consuming services ?

  23. Distributed resources Cluster-based active node Execution environment Kernel NIC (Programmable)

  24. Tamanoir architecture : on a cluster

  25. Pushing performances • Improving performances of active nodes : using clustering technology • Linux Virtual Server • Strategies : • Round robin • Least connected

  26. Performance evaluation

  27. Solution / Problem • We support a full Gbit streams with a small cluster based Tamanoir active node !  • We need more resources for CPU consuming active services • How to balance workload between internal nodes of an active node without knowing length of streams and needed services ?

  28. Feedback stream based load balancing policy (FBSb) • Needs dynamic strategies for heterogeneous deployment • FBSb • Front-end machine with updated “weight” table (CPU and memory consumption of back-end machines) • Back-end machines with feedback agents and sensors

  29. Experiments • Heavy service (3-DES encryption) : this service makes an intensive use of CPU (1 stream calling this service saturates a CPU, in our test implementation); • Medium service (stateful traffic analysis) : this service uses the CPU in a less intensive way, but its impact is not transparent (3-4 streams calling this service saturate a CPU, in our test implementation).

  30. Experiments • 200: composed by 1 stream calling a service of encryption and 11 streams calling for a traffic analysis with different delays of arrival of 1 second (201), 2 seconds (202) and 5 seconds (205). • 300: composed by 4 streams calling a service of encryption and 8 streams calling for traffic analysis. with different delays of arrival of 0 second (300), 1 second (301) and 2 seconds (302).

  31. Experiments : FBSb, RR, LC • RR and LC : efficient if homogeneous dynamic services • FBSb : efficient when heterogeneous deployment

  32. Conclusions and future works • We propose a gigabit supporting software based active node using kernel module deployment and cluster • Providing load balancing support inside cluster-based active equipments is a mandatory aspect for performances • Research could also benefit for network processors technology / programmable network interface cards • Deployment of large scale active/programmable platform based on emulation : French Grid5000 project http://www.ens-lyon.fr/LIP/RESO/Software/Tamanoir

More Related