1 / 80

Positional Plagiocephaly The Shape of Affairs

Positional Plagiocephaly The Shape of Affairs. November 21, 2009 Patricia Mortenson Dr. P. Steinbok Alan Keith. Agenda (Approximate). 1:00- 1:15 Definition, incidence, risk factors 1:15- 1:45 Synostosis differential (Dr. Steinbok ) 1:45 - 2:30    Assessment, treatment, outcomes,

wilda
Télécharger la présentation

Positional Plagiocephaly The Shape of Affairs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Positional PlagiocephalyThe Shape of Affairs November 21, 2009 Patricia Mortenson Dr. P. Steinbok Alan Keith

  2. Agenda (Approximate) • 1:00- 1:15 Definition, incidence, risk factors • 1:15- 1:45 Synostosis differential (Dr. Steinbok) • 1:45 - 2:30   Assessment, treatment, outcomes, sequelae • 15 minute stretch break • 2:45 - 3:15    Head banding (Alan Keith) • 3:15 - 3:30    Clinical pathways, future, resources • 3:30 - 4:00    Questions & problem solving

  3. OBJECTIVES • Define positional plagiocephaly & risk factors • Be aware of differential diagnoses • Learn assessment techniques • Understand treatment guidelines • Describe outcomes & sequelae • Know how and when to make appropriate referrals in BC

  4. PLAGIOCEPHALY? • “oblique head” • Causes • Deformational forces on moldable skull • Nature of the infant skull • Uterine & post-natal positioning • Gravitational forces • Correlation with torticollis

  5. INCIDENCE • More cases with Back to Sleep (Persing et al., 2003) • At birth • 13% in singletons • Flat spots in 56% of twins (Peitsch et al., 2002) • 61% asymmetry of the head; 16% torticollis (Stelleagen et al., 2008)

  6. Natural History • Followed 200 infants recruited at birth • Looked at plagiocephaly/brachycephaly: • 16% at 6 weeks • 19.7% at 4 months • 6.8% at 12 months • 3.3% at 24 months (Hutchison et al, 2004)

  7. Boy First born Multiple birth Prematurity Intrauterine constraint Torticollis Developmental delay Macrocephaly Caregiving Factors Bottle feeding Tummy time < 3X/day Tummy time < 5 min/day Positioning in crib (van Vlimmeren et al., 2007; Hutchinson et al., 2003; Losee et al., 2007) RISK FACTORS

  8. Plagiocephaly & Torticollis • Variable reported co-relations: e.g. • From 5 – 67% in Texas wide review of facilities/cases • Variation in diagnosis of CMT and SCM imbalance • Depends on specialty of facility/service Pivar & Scheuerle, 2006

  9. Types

  10. Occipital Positional Plagiocephaly www.plagiocephaly.org • Unilateral occipital flattening • Ear may be forward (Ipsilateral) • Forehead and cheek may be forward (Ipsilateral)

  11. Brachycephaly www.plagiocephaly.org • Bilateral occipital flattening • Side of head widened

  12. Positional Scaphocephaly www.plagiocephaly.org • Long and narrow head • More common in premature babies

  13. ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT

  14. HISTORY • Pregnancy, Birth & Neonatal history • When did parents first notice • Stayed same, gotten better/worse? • Torticollis? • What strategies have they already tried

  15. HISTORY • Positioning for sleep, feeding, play • ? Tummy Time • Time spent in car seats, swings etc. • Development

  16. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT • View from top, back, sides, front

  17. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT • Describe shape of head

  18. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT

  19. Eye symmetry & shape When in doubt refer to neurosurgery CLINICAL ASSESSMENT

  20. Clinical Assessment • Check head turning and tilt • If possible, assess in sitting, supine & prone

  21. ? How to Quantify

  22. Measurement • Challenges: • 2D measures on 3D object • Squirmy subjects • Variety of methods: • Visual ratings • Anthropometric (caliper measures) • Digital photos • CT scan • Laser scanner

  23. Measurement Issues • Issues with • Classification • Reliability • Cost • Radiation & Sedation (Mortenson & Steinbok, 2006) • Need standardized classification system (McGarry et al., 2008)

  24. For now…. • Argenta’s clinical classification • Severity assessment sheets available at: www.cranialtech.com • ? Reliability / validity

  25. Argenta’s Classification • Type I just back of skull • Type II adds mal position of I/L ear • Type III adds forehead deformity • Type IV adds facial deformity • Type V adds temporal bossing or C/L bossing Argenta, 2004

  26. Argenta’s Classification • Moderately reliable for Types I – IV (flatenning, ear malposition, frontal bossing, facial asymmetry) • but NOT for vertical skull height (Spermon et al, 2008) • ? Degree & responsiveness, ? Validity

  27. Measurement - Brachycephaly • Cranial Index Maximum head breadth X 100 Maximum head length Scaphocephalic – up to 75.9 Brachycephalic – 81 and over • However ? New norms – wider head shapes with supine sleeping (Pomatto, et al., 2006)

  28. Argenta’s Classification • Type I central posterior skull • Type II widening of the skull • Type III Temporal or vertical skull growth Argenta, 2004 • ? Reliability/validity

  29. TREATMENT

  30. Rapid head growth Positioning for prevention and treatment Reverse process TREATMENT - Positioning

  31. SLEEP POSITION • Place in crib so baby looks into room on the “round” side • Place mobile/crib mirror on “round” side • Turn head when asleep

  32. SLEEP PRODUCTS • American Academy Position Statement “We recommend that firm flat bedding be used for normal healthy infants, with sheets and light blankets as needed, but without products to maintain the sleeping position.” www.cps.ca/english/statements/IP/cps98-01.htm#sleep

  33. Safe T Sleep www.safetsleep.com Not approved by CPA Cautious use, Hutchison et al., 2007 POTENTIAL PRODUCTS

  34. POTENTIAL PRODUCTS • Cranial cup • Custom molded “dish” for head to rest in during sleep • Weak evidence that effective in correcting early plagio (Rogers et al., 2008) • ? Safety and approval for use

  35. UPRIGHT • Use of carriers • Hip belts & wide straps Ergo carrier Baby Trecker

  36. PLAY POSITION • Awake & up • Tummy time • Supported sitting • Side lying for play

  37. TUMMY TIME • Start with short but FREQUENT times • Options include: • On chest • Over legs • Supported on Floor

  38. TUMMY TIME TEACHING BE: • Encouraging • Realistic • Demonstrate on baby OR doll

  39. BUMBO Not all babies tolerate never use on an elevated surface supervise www.bumbosafety.com

  40. SIDE LYING • On Round side • Best for pre-rollers • Rolled blankets • “Sleep” positioning devices

  41. Bottle feed from “round” side Feed from “round” side in highchair FEEDING POSITION

  42. BABY EQUIPMENT • Car seat stays in car • Stroller 101 • Limit Swing Use • Good equipment

  43. IMPORTANT FACTORS • Multiple options for caregivers • Realistic • Demonstration as needed • Address any developmental factors

  44. TREATMENT - Orthotic Headband • Indications • Moderate/severe • Face involved • Positioning not working • How it works • Wear • 23 hours/day for months • Limitations • Cost • Commitment • Hot weather

  45. TREATMENT – Other issues • Torticollis – need to treat • Positioning not as effective(Losee et al., 2007) • Motor & Developmental delays • Parental guilt

  46. OUTCOMES & SEQUELAE

  47. OUTCOMES • Natural improvement (Hutchison et al., 2004) • Conflicting evidence – 3 systematic reviews • Positioning OR headband > than leaving be • Positioning = headband but takes longer • Helmet > positioning (most studies) (Bialocerkowski et al., 2005; McGarry, 2008; Xia et al., 2008)

More Related