1 / 17

UNITED AIRLINES Flight Standards and Technology

UNITED AIRLINES Flight Standards and Technology. FLIGHT DECK WEATHER - A BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE. UNITED AIRLINES “AIRNET” PROGRAM. Class II EFB, Charts, Manuals, and WIC Fully funded United program In vendor selection now Phase I – domestic fleets Phase 2 – international

wilda
Télécharger la présentation

UNITED AIRLINES Flight Standards and Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNITED AIRLINESFlight Standards and Technology FLIGHT DECK WEATHER - A BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE

  2. UNITED AIRLINES “AIRNET” PROGRAM • Class II EFB, Charts, Manuals, and WIC • Fully funded United program • In vendor selection now • Phase I – domestic fleets • Phase 2 – international • First fleet deployments flying mid-2007 • Totally business case driven approval

  3. EFB / WIC BUSINESS CASE • EFB Business Case is difficult to make • Industry agrees it’s a good idea, but how do you prove it pays for itself? • Charts / manuals / paper replacement don’t come close to covering costs • Demonstrable increased operating efficiency is key to making the case • Quantifying “might-have-beens”

  4. EFB-ENABLED OPERATING EFFICIENCIES • Weight & balance, takeoff performance • Weather-related benefits • Diversion distance/time reduction • Contingency fuel reduction • Turbulence-related incident reduction • Paper replacement • Printing, shipping and paper costs • Overall weight reduction

  5. THE WIC BUSINESS CASE • United did detailed analysis of over 80,000 actual flights to quantify WIC benefits • WIC benefits are a major, compelling part of United’s AIRNET business case • Graphical and alphanumeric products • Broadcast delivery, NOT request/reply • ACARS cost reduction • Increased operating efficiencies

  6. DOMESTIC versus INTERNATIONAL WIC BUSINESS CASES • United’s two-phased approach is based on significant differences in cost/benefit • International WIC is harder to cost-justify • Communications is harder, more expensive • Less weather information, granularity, & verification • Delivery must “buy itself on” aircraft for other reasons

  7. EFB – CLASS 1, 2, or 3? • Class 1 cannot be used for true paper replacement in all phases of flight • Class 3 costs substantially more than Class 2, making payback extremely difficult to justify • Class 2 allows most payback per unit cost – BUT with some artificial limitations driven by ‘avionics thinking’

  8. WIC on CLASS II EFBAvionics, or Not? • GA is essentially exempt from AC120-76A limitations • Single pilot typical operations • Limited if any other graphical avionics displays onboard typical GA aircraft • Definite potential for graphical EFB/WIC display to become “compelling” to pilot • No AC limitations on pilot “over-use” of non-certified graphical displays/information

  9. WIC on CLASS II EFBAvionics, or Not? • Part 121 and 91/F operators are explicitly prohibited from Class II display of own-ship, or even “circle of uncertainty” displays • Background thinking based on traditional avionics certification methodology • Consider only the system being certified, not the operational context • No certification “credit” for other related aircraft/crew capabilities, equipage, training, etc. • Yet AC120-76A is an OPERATIONAL APPROVAL process by definition

  10. WIC on CLASS II EFBAvionics, or Not? • Typical NBAA and airline aircraft today have multiple certified, center-field-of-vision, graphical Nav/MFD displays • In this environment it is extremely unlikely that pilots will find a side-mounted, limited function EFB to be “compelling” relative to PFD/ND/MFD • Crews are highly trained and performance/compliance monitored

  11. WIC on CLASS II EFBAvionics, or Not? • The industry needs a more pragmatic approach to operational approval guidance for Class II EFBs, considering: • Other aircraft equipage • Relative locations of displays • Crew training and disciplinary standards • Merit versus gain [Example: reduced turbulence injuries]

  12. FLIGHT DECK vs DISPATCH WEATHER • Optimized decision making requires collaboration and information pooling • Very different responsibilities and environment: • information acquisition • display, assimilation, and usage • capabilities and limitations • WIC must mitigate the problem of information “Haves” and “Have Nots”

  13. FLIGHT DECK vs DISPATCH WEATHER • Dispatch: • strategic planning, flight following • High bandwidth, low cost comms • High resolution displays, low light/vibration environment • No access to real-time board radar or sensory inputs • Flight Crew: • Tactical planning, safety of flight, ride quality • Low bandwidth, high cost comms • Low resolution displays, poor viewing environment • Real-time sensory and radar data access

  14. FLIGHT DECK vs DISPATCH WEATHER • United’s approach: • “Functionally equivalent” weather information • Emphasis on “commodity weather” data • NEXRAD, IR SAT, GTG, etc. • METARs, TAFs, D-ATIS • Different suppliers, but equivalent data • Dispatch must have ability to view the same data delivered to flight deck if/when needed

  15. NGATS / WIC FACTORS to CONSIDER • Near-term operational benefits are key to technology adoption in today’s industry • Incremental approach is the only practical way to reach “brave new world” • Don’t price the solution out of the game • Demanding the perfect solution IS the greatest enemy of accomplishing something good

  16. UNITED NGATS PERSPECTIVE • Monolithic “Hal 9000” or “Colossus” is NOT the answer • ALL viable contributing capabilities must be leveraged to succeed • “System of Systems” is a better analogy

  17. UNITED NGATS PERSPECTIVE “The problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them” -Albert Einstein

More Related