1 / 11

Impacts of SoS on Software Development

Impacts of SoS on Software Development. USC CSSE Workshop Integrating Systems and Software Engineering October 29, 2007. Gary Hafen Corporate Fellow, Software Engineering. Situation. Software is providing an increasing percentage of functionality in our systems Space Craft Aircraft

wilhelmina
Télécharger la présentation

Impacts of SoS on Software Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impacts of SoS on Software Development USC CSSE Workshop Integrating Systems and Software Engineering October 29, 2007 Gary Hafen Corporate Fellow, Software Engineering

  2. Situation • Software is providing an increasing percentage of functionality in our systems • Space Craft • Aircraft • Ships • Automobiles • Cell Phones • Etc.

  3. Situation • Systems are being networked to achieve capabilities beyond what individual systems alone can provide • System of Systems • Family of Systems • Global Information Grid • Communities of Interest

  4. Ramification • Monolithic System design methods and techniques won’t scale up to an asynchronous, loosely coupled, multi-node, system of systems • Does not hierarchically decompose functionally • Manage and minimize constraints vs. variables • Adaptive vs. conformal interface logic

  5. Monolithic System Design • Defined and Contained Scope of Function • Centralized control • Can design with hierarchical structure • Deterministic Behavior • Desirable characteristic that is verified and validated • Planned Evolution • Controlled centrally Traditional Acquisition Process Works For These Systems

  6. SoS Design • Initially Defined Scope of Function • Not all requirements can be known • Decentralized control of internal and external interfaces • Architecture must be adaptive to uncontrolled interface changes • Behavior Emerges • Cannot perform traditional Verification • Emerging behavior may be good or bad depending on objectives and constraints • SoS Evolution is not controlled by a central authority • It Happens

  7. Impact on Software - 1 • Software Requirements Allocation is problematic • All requirements are not known • Software solutions must balance performance versus adaptability/flexibility • Functionality may need to be migrated between non-heterogeneous systems • Interfaces cannot be assured to be consistent or even present • Functionality must adapt to external environment • Creates a wider range of test conditions Requirements Growth/Instability is a Traditional Software Risk

  8. Impact on Software - 2 • Software Architecture Technologies • Standards such as DoDAF, SoA, XML, CORBA are necessary • Adaptive, intelligent network awareness characteristics are now required • Exploitation of Expert Agent and Data Mining Technologies to achieve capability • Polymorphic Computing Architectures • Fault Containment/Tolerance to unplanned external stimulus Non-Determinism is Now an Asset

  9. Impact on Software - 3 • Implementation Technologies • Model Based Development • Auto-generation of code, test vectors • 4th or 5th generation languages • Intelligent System composition tools • Performance and Quality of Service assurance

  10. Impact on Software - 4 • Test/Verification/Validation • Non-deterministic functional operation • Uncontrolled Test Environment • Isolation of errors in shared SoS architecture space • Intelligent System validation • Software Assurance • Multiple Independent Levels of Security • Information Assurance in an Information Warfare environment • Cyber Attack

  11. Summary • A System of Systems cannot be defined, designed, developed, verified and validated by conventional system development processes • What used to be considered design “gold plating” may now be mainstream thinking • Controlling functional performance to a confined envelope of conditions is no longer feasible • Emergent behavior has to be evaluated as desirable or undesirable • Adaptive characteristics need to be included in requirements allocation • With the lack of controlled behavior, continuous Software Assurance becomes a focused priority.

More Related