1 / 74

Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005

Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine For related information visit: http://www.newmoa.org/prevention/mercury/conferences.

willow
Télécharger la présentation

Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine For related information visit: http://www.newmoa.org/prevention/mercury/conferences

  2. An Approach to Consider in Evaluating Mercury ProductWaste Disposal Trends Randy England and Michael Aucott, NJDEP, DSRT May 25, 2005

  3. Examining our assumptions and success • NJ Hg TF Recommendations • Making Progress, not pursuing Model Leg as yet • Targeting certain categories where we expect significant reductions /env impct • Emission Regs • Universal Waste Rule • Heard earlier of NJ’s Automotive mercury removal • April, 2005-Thermometer sale restrictions • Brochure-outreach/education • How to track effectiveness?

  4. Batteries were ~ 90% of the total discards of mercury in products in the municipal solid waste stream (1989) EPA, 1992 Report 530-R-92-013, “Characterization of Products Containing Mercury in Municipal Solid Waste in the United States, 1970 to 2000”…Franklin Associates, Ltd. NJ Dry Cell Battery Management Act (1992/1996) Mercury was phased out of certain types of batteries in conjunction with the "Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act," (passed in 1996) What did we observe?

  5. Other Factors 1996-MSWI Not at Full Capacity 1994-NJDEP Air Regulations (Separation/segregation & emission limits)

  6. USGS: The Materials Flow of Mercury in the Economies of the United States and the World by John L. Sznopek1 and Thomas G. Goonan1 Open-File Report 00-281 http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2000/c1197/ QSC/ECOS: Mercury Commodity Market Review-Economic Facts & Reasoning about the Global Mercury Commodity Market, including US Contributions

  7. add 98 to 2004 ?

  8. CONCLUSION Interesting, but inconclusive result Seems that mercury levels are decreasing For accurate tracking, need Total Metals over time (consistent procedures, etc) Stay Tuned

  9. For Info: randy.england@dep.nj.state.us(609) 984-7927mike.aucott@dep.nj.state.us(609) 292-7530

  10. Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine

  11. PROPOSED MERCURY REDUCTION INDICATORSFOR NEWMOA STATES RICH PHILLIPS Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation

  12. Indicator Development Process • Individual NEWMOA state efforts • Regional core mercury reduction indicators suggested by directors • Regional workgroup proposal • Directors considering indicator package • Concept is an agreed upon core group and states provide data annually if available

  13. PRODUCT COLLECTION/RECYCLING PROGRAMS • Indicator – Pounds of Mercury Collected from: • AUTO SWITCHES • AMALGAM SEPARATORS • FLUORESCENT LAMPS • THERMOSTATS • THERMOMETERS • K-12 SCHOOLS

  14. PRODUCT BANS/PHASE-OUTS • Indicator – Amount of Mercury Reduced from: • STATE SALESBANS: • MERCURY FEVER THERMOMETERS • THERMOSTATS • SWITCHES IN CARS • STATE SALES PHASE-OUTS: • According to amount of mercury in each phased-out product or product category • Voluntary manufacturer efforts prompted by state laws

  15. PRODUCT LABELING • Indicator • Number of products or product categories with approved labeling plans in Vermont. • Number of manufacturers now labeling their products as reported through Vermont.

  16. www.newmoa.org ( Terri Goldberg (617) 367-8558 x302 tgoldberg@newmoa.org

  17. Presentations May 23 – 25, 2005 Portland, Maine

  18. Quicksilver Caucus Mercury Compendium Peggy Harris, P.E. CA Department of Toxic Substances Control

  19. Purpose of QSC Hg Compendium • Strengthen State Capacity to Reduce and Manage Hg • Assess status of State activities • Develop State action plan guidance • Develop tool box for States • 45 States have responded

  20. Survey Contents • Strategies and Outcome Measures • Hg Sources and Monitoring • Pollution Prevention, Recycling, Management & Cleanup • Public Outreach & Hg Related Research • Vehicle switches

  21. Hg survey results • Does your state quantify progress on reducing mercury pollution?

  22. Most frequently used measures to quantify progress

  23. Measure to best quantify progress on Hg pollution reduction • Reduction in fish tissue concentration • Emissions reductions • Amount of Hg collected

  24. Top 3 intrastate anthropogenic sources of Hg

  25. Hg monitoring

  26. Bans/limits on Hg-containing products

More Related