1 / 9

RPR OAM

IEEE 802.17 Draft 2.5 OAM Comment Resolution Las Vegas, NV - September 2003 Section Editor: Glenn Parsons Technical Editors: Leon Bruckman , Gal Mor. RPR OAM. Met in 1 session (3 long hours) for: 72 comments reviewed Did not deal with most Editorials

wilma
Télécharger la présentation

RPR OAM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.17 Draft 2.5OAM Comment ResolutionLas Vegas, NV - September 2003Section Editor: Glenn ParsonsTechnical Editors: Leon Bruckman, Gal Mor

  2. RPR OAM • Met in 1 session (3 long hours) for: • 72 comments reviewed • Did not deal with most Editorials • Will ask for editorial license for 41 remaining editorials • Punted 2 comments to WG • Punted 2 comments to clause 0 • Highlight of CRG resolutions • Response to IETF on MIB

  3. OAM Comments Summary • Clause 11: OAM 41 • Accepted 17 • Rejected 3 • Withdrawn 1 • Remaining Editorial 22 • Annex L: Echo & Flush OAM 5 • Accepted 2 • Remaining Editorial 3 • Clause 12: Management 18 • Accepted 12 • Withdrawn 1 • Remaining Editorial 5 • Annex D: MIB 26 • Accepted 17 • Withdrawn 1 • Rejected 1 • Remaining Editorial 3 All Technical done

  4. Fix RPR alarms references Fix PICS Various binding editorials Various wording clarifications Fix state machine routines Align frame/payload format with new clause 0 resolution Clause 11 & L Highlights

  5. Complete parameters Clarify & add reference for HC Various clarifications Clause 12 Highlights

  6. Various binding editorials Clarify security section Delicate text on clearing intervals Table D.2 improvements Change running counters back to counter64 Clause D Highlights

  7. Rejected • Clause 11 • 391 - Table 11.2 • Delete • This table is useful clarification of a complex figure. It should stay. • Annex D • Editorial rejection

  8. Punt to WG • 415 - EUI vs OUI • Topology & OAM Organization specific protocol identifiers • Was OUI, currently EUI, comment to make OUI • EUI rejected for similar use in 802.3ah • Propose liaison to IEEE RAC • 467 - DELAY_TO_CHECK, DELAY_TO_RESTORE • Clause 6 uses as constant • MIB uses as read/write

  9. Ongoing review Issues • OAM Editors need some extra time at the end of the draft writing to align the MIB cross-references • IETF MIB experts will be informed of the disposition of their comments and continue to be offered to provide comments on future WG ballots

More Related