310 likes | 437 Vues
This discussion evaluates the complex issue of cheating in online environments, focusing on both the perceived and real challenges faced by faculty, instructional designers, and administrators. It explores two primary approaches: the "search and destroy" method, which relies on technology to detect and punish cheating, and the "hearts and minds" strategy, aimed at fostering a community of ethical scholarship through engagement and education. By examining emerging solutions, we can better understand and address the various perceptions of cheating in online education.
E N D
1. Problem: cheating, spec. in online environnments, whether REAL or PERCIEVED
For: faculty, instructional designers, administrators who only care when cheating is reported
Well consider both approaches to dealing with cheating: search and destroy (seek cheating, use technology to expose, and punish), and hearts and minds (convince students of the value of real learning, the pointlessness/detractions of cheating, and foster a community [fuuuzzzzy] of ethical scholarship [gag])
Tackle the question of how we deal with cheating in online learning environments
We can learn something about perceptions and realities of online cheating by looking at emerging solutions.Problem: cheating, spec. in online environnments, whether REAL or PERCIEVED
For: faculty, instructional designers, administrators who only care when cheating is reported
Well consider both approaches to dealing with cheating: search and destroy (seek cheating, use technology to expose, and punish), and hearts and minds (convince students of the value of real learning, the pointlessness/detractions of cheating, and foster a community [fuuuzzzzy] of ethical scholarship [gag])
Tackle the question of how we deal with cheating in online learning environments
We can learn something about perceptions and realities of online cheating by looking at emerging solutions.