1 / 16

Rating Teacher Performance

Rating Teacher Performance. 0. Interim Evaluation. Documents evidence of meeting standards Does NOT include rating of performance Multiple data sources should be considered Evaluator provides feedback to teacher by set date. 1. Sample Interim Evaluation Form.

winger
Télécharger la présentation

Rating Teacher Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rating Teacher Performance 0

  2. Interim Evaluation • Documents evidence of meeting standards • Does NOT include rating of performance • Multiple data sources should be considered • Evaluator provides feedback to teacher by set date 1

  3. Sample Interim Evaluation Form TeacherTeacher OSchool Year(s) - Grade/Subject Grade 8/Foundations of Algebra Part 2 School YourtownMS Strengths: Teacher O uses well-thought out examples in his lessons to point out different mistakes students typically make with various concepts. He understands the vertical articulation of his subject matter. He seems genuinely concerned about his students. Areas of Improvement: Teacher O needs to work on thinking through all aspects of his lesson plans to make sure that he has taken into consideration student learning data, materials needed for each lesson, and differentiation strategies for different types of students in his class. He should also look at his longer-range plans to ensure his interim learning goals support student learning needs. 2 Abbreviated Form for Training Purposes

  4. Summative Evaluation • Comes at end of evaluation cycle • - One year for probationary teachers • - Three years for continuing contract teachers • Assessment of performance quality • Ratings for each standard based on multiple data sources • Performance standards and indicators provide description of well-defined teacher expectations • Four point rating scale • Performance rubric for every standard 3

  5. Definitions of Terms • Used in Rating Scale 4

  6. Performance Rubrics Along with sample performance indicators, performance rubrics help guide an evaluator’s judgment for rating teacher performance. • Behavioral summary scale that describes acceptable performance levels • Guides evaluators in assessing how well a standard is performed • Increase reliability among evaluators • Help teachers to focus on ways to enhance their teaching practice 5

  7. Standard 1: Professional Knowledge • The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. 6

  8. Standard 2: Instructional Planning • The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school’s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. 7

  9. Standard 3: Instructional Delivery • The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. 8

  10. Standard 4: Assessment of and for Student Learning • The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the school year. 9

  11. Standard 5: Learning Environment The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning. 10

  12. Standard 6: Professionalism • The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. 11

  13. Standard 7: Student Academic Progress • The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress. 12

  14. Sample Summative Evaluation Form TeacherTeacher OSchool Year(s) Grade/Subject Grade 8/Foundations of Algebra Part 2 School YourtownMS Contract Status: X Probationary  Continuing Contract • Overall Evaluation Summary: • Include comments here • Exemplary • Proficient • X Developing/Needs Improvement • Unacceptable • X Recommended for placement on a Performance Improvement Plan. (One or more standards are • Unacceptable, or two or more standards are Developing/Needs Improvement.) 13 Abbreviated Form for Training Purposes

  15. Summative Rating Summative ratings should apply the rating for each of the seven performance expectations, with the most significant weight given to Standard 7 - student academic progress. • Virginia Department of Education recommends the following guidelines for summative ratings: • Weight each of the first six standards equally at 10 percent each • Weight Standard 7 – Student Academic Progress at 40 percent 14

  16. Example of Weighted Calculations for Teacher Performance Evaluations 15

More Related