1 / 27

Funding Options / Models Electricity Indaba

Funding Options / Models Electricity Indaba. Presenter: Marissa Moore| 16 March 2012. The whole local government fiscal framework is designed to finance municipalities. Transfers and Grants. Municipal own revenues. Direct transfers. Operating revenues.

winifred
Télécharger la présentation

Funding Options / Models Electricity Indaba

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Funding Options / ModelsElectricity Indaba Presenter: Marissa Moore| 16 March 2012

  2. The wholelocal government fiscal framework is designed to finance municipalities Transfers and Grants Municipal own revenues Direct transfers Operating revenues Equitable share & RSC levy replacement grant Rates and taxes Municipal operating budget Service charges National / provincial operating grants Sources of capital funding Surplus / cash-backed reserves Municipal borrowing National / provincial infrastructure grants Municipal capital budget Indirect transfers Chapter 3 Intergovernmental relations and the local government fiscal framework

  3. What is the current reality in municipal electricity distribution? • The wholelocal government fiscal framework is designed to finance municipalities, including the municipal electricity distribution function • Need an appropriate balance between own resources, grants and borrowing • Free basic electricity to the poor is funded through equitable share, including increases in bulk electricity prices • Need an appropriate balance between investing in new infrastructure and maintaining existing infrastructure • Tariffs to be used to fund new infrastructure and maintenance for services provided to non-poor households • Indigent policies to be appropriately targeted towards the poor and such cross-subsidisation be explicit

  4. National government continues to provide significant support to LG Transfers by type, 2006/07 - 2012/13

  5. Key issues impacting on municipal performance • Municipal budgets must be funded and realistic • Depleted cash reserves – operating at the absolute margin • General under-pricing of municipal services – bankrupting municipalities • Revenue projections are unrealistic – not based on requirements of the MFMA • Operating expenditures are too high – driven by non-priority spending • Capital budgets are too ambitious • Maintenance of existing assets needs urgent attention • Lack of key technical skills – qualified managers, engineers and technicians • Weak asset management systems • Spending on repairs and maintenance inadequate to maintain assets • Maintenance spending is reactive, and so is more costly than planned maintenance • Own funding of capital budgets needs to increase • Increased grant reliance, and reduced own funding of the capital budget • Tariffs and operating budgets not making provision to fund capital • Municipalities (other than metros) not adequately leveraging private finance to fund economic infrastructure

  6. Municipalities continue to face important fiscal challenges Municipal own contribution to capital expenditure, 2006 to 2012 Municipal own contributions are now less than 50% of total capital spending Chapter 4 Revenue and expenditure trends in local government

  7. Scope exists to improve access to private finance

  8. Is expenditure supporting sustainable electricity service delivery? Chapter 9 Electricity

  9. Electricity distribution losses are increasing

  10. Abbreviated Extract: MFMA Circular 58 – 2 of 2 • Eskom price will increase by 16% on 1 July 2012. Municipalities are urged to examine cost structure of their electricity undertakings and apply to NERSA for electricity tariff increases that are cost reflective and ensure continued financial sustainability • NT supports the use of the following formula, proposed by NERSA, for calculating municipal electricity tariff increases: • MTI = (B x BPI) + (S x SI) + (R x RI) + (C x CCI) + (OC x OCI) , Where • MTI = % Municipal Tariff Increase • B = % Bulk purchases / increase • S = % Salaries / increase • R = % Repairs / increase • C = % Capital charges / increase • OC = % Other costs / increase • Each municipality needs to design an IBT structure that is appropriate to its specific circumstances, and ensures an appropriate balance between ‘low income customers’ and other domestic, commercial and business customers, and the financial interests of the municipality • Municipal surcharge issue to be considered

  11. Key areas to address existing challenges in electricity distribution • National (policy, regulation and support) • National strategy to clarify roles and responsibilities, set norms and standards • Regulator to align efficiency and costs in line with the national strategy • Capacity support • Building the requisite skills in municipalities to plan, budget, roll-out and maintain service (full value chain) • Differentiation between municipalities in which services can be supplied in a viable manner and areas where investment support is needed • Intern programme for technical capacity building • Municipalities • Need for increased investment in maintenance and refurbishment of municipal electricity distribution infrastructure • Municipalities need proper electricity distribution asset registers to inform refurbishment and maintenance plan

  12. Role of National Treasury • National Treasury is undertaking budget reforms to provide for transparency in electricity budgeting and expenditure • Regulations introduced • Standard Chart of Accounts being developed • Ongoing work between NT and NERSA • NERSA, in collaboration with Office of the Accountant General, to introduce standardised reporting with respect to municipal electricity function • NERSA, Eskom and SALGA to address implementation challenges wrt Inclining Block Tariffs • A review of the current LG fiscal framework currently underway, which will complement reforms already introduced • LG equitable share has been reformed over last few years to direct additional resources to small and poor municipalities • Substantial increases made to LG equitable share to enable municipalities to cater for the price increases to provide Free Basic Energy to poor households • Norms and standards for electricity surcharges as per Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Act • Regulation of municipal tariff setting and norms and standards on municipal surcharges to be aligned

  13. Way Forward – 2 of 2 • National Treasury is undertaking budget reforms to provide for transparency in electricity budgeting and expenditure • Greater understanding of revenue and expenditure • Electricity distribution leads to increased revenue, greater ability to borrow funds and leverage to improve the collection of other monies owed to the municipality • Requiring skills and investment that not all municipalities have the capacity to manage • Intern programme for technical capacity building • Differentiation between municipalities in which services can be supplied in a viable manner and areas where investment support is needed

  14. , Thank You

  15. , SUPPORTING INFORMATION

  16. Operational Revenue

  17. Operational Expenditure

  18. Capital Expenditure

  19. Capital Expenditure Continue

  20. Performance

  21. Size of LG equitable share

  22. Basic Services share on LGES

  23. Free Basic Electricity

  24. INEP Connections

  25. LG Equitable Share • LG Equitable Share (LGES) formula targets four basic services • Electricity, water, sanitation and refuse (also environmental health) • Number of poor households with (full allocation) or without access to basic services/infrastructure (partial allocation) • Poor household currently defined as households with incomes of ≤R800 per month (2001 Census data) • R6.7b was added to LGES over baseline for the 2010 MTEF for electricity bulk increases • Subsidised electricity provision (inclining block tariffs) • Costs recouped at higher levels of use through the increased tariffs • The inclining block tariff result in the tariff for poor customers declining by 8 % compared to the 2009/10 tariff and 18 % in 2010/11 • Implementation challenges to be addressed

  26. Support to the poor through Free Basic Energy • Funding distribution infrastructure backlogs will require additional increases in tariffs • Higher tariffs control demand for electricity • Free Basic Services was announced in 2000 and Electricity Basic Services Support Tariff (EBSST) Policy was introduced in 2003 • EBSST policy prescribes that an allocation of 50kWh per monthbe provided to all poor households connected to national electricity grid in both Municipal and Eskom areas of supply • Poor households cushioned by the free basic electricity policy, inclining block tariffs and solar water geyser programme - Secret -

  27. Monthly Income as cut off for Indigent Policy (DCoG data)

More Related