1 / 2

Deliberate Practice and Performance: A Meta- analysis

Deliberate Practice and Performance: A Meta- analysis Brooke N. Macnamara David Z. Hambrick Frederick L. Oswald. Brooke N. Macnamara. MICHIGAN STATE U N I V E R S I T Y. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY. Results. Introduction. 1. 3. 4. Additional Analyses. Deliberate practice

winola
Télécharger la présentation

Deliberate Practice and Performance: A Meta- analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deliberate Practice and Performance: A Meta-analysis Brooke N. MacnamaraDavid Z. Hambrick Frederick L. Oswald Brooke N. Macnamara MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Results Introduction 1 3 4 Additional Analyses Deliberate practice (Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993) • claim: • provides a sufficient account of variance in performance • denies: • role of innate abilities as important predictors • “10,000-hour rule” inspiration • - 10,000 hours deliberate practice = expert 19% 81% extremely popular theory - pop psychology books - op eds - magazines - blogs - social media Is it defensible? amount of performance variance explained by deliberate practice amount of performance variance unexplained by deliberate practice By Domain Conclusion • Characteristics 2 5 Professions Education Music Sports Games Deliberate practice 03% < 01% 18% 24% 27% • • explains a substantial amount of performance variance • - however - • • leaves a larger amount unexplained • • varies by domain • • varies by predictability of task environment • • small effects: systematically suppressed from publication • • does not provide a substantial account • of performance variance > 99% 76% 73% 82% 97% amount of performance variance explained by deliberate practice amount of performance variance unexplained by deliberate practice 10% 16% 23% 90% 84% 77% Have unpublished deliberate practice data you’re willing to share to be included in this meta-analysis? See next page. Extremely popular theory is not defensible. Task Environment Less Predictable Highly Predictable

  2. Deliberate Practice Meta-analysis • Have unpublished deliberate practice data you would be willing to share? • If so, please let us know: • Names • your and your collaborator(s) full names so we can cite you and your data • General • Who were the participants? • How many participants (per group if multiple groups were used) • What was the skill of interest? • What was the timeframe of accumulated practice? • Methods • How did you estimate accumulated deliberate practice? (e.g., questionnaire) • How did you estimate skill? (e.g., expert rated, compared professionals to amateurs) • Results or raw data • Results: what kind of statistics did you use? (e.g., ANOVA, correlation) • Results: what were the results of the analysis? (e.g., F = ___, Cohen’s d = ___, r = __) • Raw data: please let us know if each row = a subject • Raw data: please make sure columns are labeled clearly

More Related