400 likes | 547 Vues
TIMSS Advanced 2008 Overview. Professors Ina V.S. Mullis and Michael O. Martin Executive Directors University of Oslo, December 9, 2009. International Release. Introduction. TIMSS Advanced 2008 Assesses final-year students with special preparation in. Advanced mathematics Physics.
E N D
TIMSS Advanced 2008Overview Professors Ina V.S. Mullis and Michael O. MartinExecutive Directors University of Oslo, December 9, 2009
TIMSS Advanced 2008 Assesses final-year students with special preparation in • Advanced mathematics • Physics First administered in 1995 • Trends 1995 to 2008
Armenia Italy Iran Lebanon Netherlands Norway Philippines Russian Federation Slovenia Sweden Countries Participating •Also participated in 1995
Increasingly select population by final year • Left school • Range of courses and choices • Not all students study all subjects
Percentage enrolled in advanced courses varies • Curricular choices available to students • Students choosing to specialize • Selectivity of country Increasing differentiation • Small percentages in advanced courses • “Best and brightest”
TIMSS AdvancedResults • Extensive data on contexts for learning • Achievement in relation to contexts • Information about students’ programs and experiences
Key Policy Issue – “Yield” How many can be educated to high level? • “Mathematics for all” • Practical considerations • Strategic planning
Assessed carefully defined populations • Taking advanced courses in mathematics or physics • Specialists in pre-university programs • Programs lasting three to five years
TIMSS Advanced 2008 Frameworks • Advanced mathematics • Algebra • Calculus • Geometry • Physics • Mechanics • Electricity and magnetism • Heat and temperature • Atomic and nuclear physics
Students surviving the pipeline • Varies across countries • Remained in school • Studied mathematics and science • Studying at high level all through school careers
100 TIMSS Advanced Coverage Index Students Taking Advanced Courses Entire Age Cohort
40.5 19.7 12.8 10.9 6.5 5.9 4.3 3.5 1.4 0.7 TIMSS Advanced 2008 Mathematics Coverage Index Slovenia Italy Sweden Norway Iran Lebanon Armenia Netherlands Russian Federation Philippines 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage
Age Years of School
Selectivity Instructional Time for Advanced Mathematics
11 7.5 6.8 6.6 5.9 4.3 3.8 3.4 2.6 TIMSS Advanced 2008Physics Coverage Index Sweden Slovenia Norway Iran Lebanon Armenia Italy Netherlands Russian Federation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage
Selectivity Instructional Time for Physics
Role of Technologyin Education • Results for mathematics and physics classes • Calculators used more frequently than computers
89 57 83 53 82 78 82 75 80 84 78 62 74 67 68 67 29 Advanced Mathematics 66 Physics 23 Students NEVER Using Computers in Class Sweden Norway Armenia Italy Iran Russian Federation Lebanon Philippines Netherlands Slovenia 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Students
Students’ Areas of Continuing Education Engineering Business Health Science Social Science
Male Male Female Female Advanced Mathematics Physics Percent of Students by Teachers’ Gender Lebanon Netherlands Netherlands Sweden Norway Norway Sweden Lebanon Iran Slovenia Italy Iran Philippines Italy Slovenia Russian Fed. Armenia Armenia Russian Fed. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
73 60 67 64 65 57 58 64 51 46 46 38 45 47 30 42 14 Advanced Mathematics 13 Physics 14 Percent of Students by Teachers’ Aged 50 years or Older Norway Netherlands Lebanon Sweden Russian Federation Armenia Italy Slovenia Philippines Iran 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Percent of Students
93 79 87 86 84 84 84 83 80 81 79 75 75 73 65 67 73 58 69 Percent of Students by Teachers’ Plans to Continue Teaching Netherlands Armenia Italy Iran Lebanon Norway Philippines Russian Federation Sweden Advanced Mathematics Physics Slovenia 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Students
Areas of concern • Disappointing achievement • Declines in yield – fewer students and lower achievement • Lack sufficient people with sufficient skills
Potential teachershortages • Dwindling of supply of highly educated teachers • Existing teachers nearing retirement
Compelling necessity • More students into mathematics and science courses • More mathematics and science students into teachers
Thank You Professors Ina V.S. Mullis and Michael O. MartinExecutive Directors University of Oslo, December 9, 2009