1 / 17

Single-Case Research Designs

11. Single-Case Research Designs. Introduction. Single-case designs use only one participant or one group of participants no random assignment and no control group single participant used most frequently History of single-case designs not case studies

wmabel
Télécharger la présentation

Single-Case Research Designs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 11 Single-Case Research Designs

  2. Introduction • Single-case designs • use only one participant or one group of participants • no random assignment and no control group • single participant used most frequently • History of single-case designs • not case studies • research in psychology began with single case experiments • Pavlov, Ebbinghaus, Skinner • Fisher’s introduction of ANOVA • single-case designs became more acceptable with the growth in research in behavior therapy

  3. Single-Case Designs • Time-series designs • with multiple data points before and after treatment is introduced • does not eliminate the history threat • assessment of a treatment effect is based on the assumption that the pattern of pretreatment responses would continue in the absence of the treatment • Simplest type of single-case design is ABA

  4. ABA Design • Baseline (A) • the target behavior of the participant in its naturally occurring state or prior to presentation of the treatment condition • Treatment (B) • recordings of behavior after the treatment has been introduced • ABA • design in which the response to the treatment condition is compared to baseline responses recorded before and after treatment • baseline – treatment – baseline • demonstration of treatment effectiveness requires return to baseline • Reversal • change of behavior back to baseline level after withdrawal of treatment

  5. ABA Example • Walker and Buckley (1968) • 9 year old exhibiting disruptive classroom behavior • baseline • % time child spent on academic assignments • baseline recorded until DV stabilized • treatment • points earned if no distraction occurred during a given time interval • points could be exchanged for model of his choice • return to baseline • when child had completed three successive ten-minute distraction-free sessions, the reinforcement of being able to earn points was withdrawn

  6. ABA Designs • Problems with ABA design • ending on baseline not acceptable from therapist point of view because you are ending with a denial of treatment • solution – ABAB design may be used • some DVs may not revert to baseline when treatment is withdrawn due to carryover • solution – multiple-baseline design • withdrawal vs. reversal design • reversal design – design in which the treatment condition is applied to an alternative but incompatible behavior so that a reversal in behavior is produced

  7. ABAB Design • Disruptive classroom behavior example • return to treatment condition after second baseline condition • should see a return of DV to treatment levels

  8. Interaction Design • Tests the combined effects of two treatments • e.g., concrete and verbal reinforcement • Similar to factorial design in that you look at each treatment (IV) individually (main effects) and combined (interaction) • Must change only one treatment at a time • Must use both sequences to test the combined influence over the effect of just one variable

  9. Interaction Design • Disadvantages • two participants may be required • interaction effect can be demonstrated only if each variable does not cause a maximum increment in performance

  10. Multiple Baseline Design • Design in which the treatment condition is successively administered to several target participants, target outcomes (DVs), or target settings • alternative to ABA or ABAB when history threat may be suspected • no withdrawal or reversal involved • Design • baseline data collected on several participants, DVs, or settings • treatment successively administered to each target (i.e., staggered) • treatment effect demonstrated by a change in behavior only when treatment is given • Requires independence of behaviors to demonstrate an effect

  11. Multiple Baseline Example • Van Houten, Van Houten, & Malenfant, 2007 • tested the effectiveness of a program designed to increase helmet use by middle school students when riding their bicycles • three schools were targeted, and baseline helmet use data were gathered at each school • the treatment program was introduced at one school at a time • increases in correct helmet use occurred when the helmet program was introduced in each school • when the campaign was introduced at the 2nd and 3rd schools, helmet use increased, but did not change at the schools still at baseline • this fingerprint or pattern of change provided evidence of the causal efficacy of the helmet advocacy program on helmet use by students

  12. Changing-Criterion Design • Design in which a participant’s behavior is gradually shaped by changing the criterion for success during successive treatment periods • Design • baseline data taken on a single behavior • treatment introduced with a criterion level of performance that needs to be met • if criterion met, then 2nd criterion level set • target behavior increased with multiple criterion levels (at least two)

  13. Changing-Criterion Design • Factors to consider in using this design • length of treatment • long enough for the behavior to stabilize • size of criterion change • large enough to notice a change • number of treatment phases • at least two, but enough to demonstrate a treatment effect

  14. Changing-Criterion Design • Himadi, Osteen, Kaiser, & Daniel (1991) • study to reduce the delusional verbalizations of a 51-year-old white male with schizophrenia, chronic undifferentiated type • the investigators first obtained baseline data on the number of delusional answers given • the treatment session consisted of asking the patient a question that had reliably elicited a delusional answer and instructing the patient to respond to the question “so that other people would agree with your answers.” After the patient provided the appropriate answer, he was given a reinforcer consisting of a cup of coffee • Phase 1 criterion, the patient had to provide nondelusional responses to two questions • Phase 2, nondelusional responses to four delusion-eliciting questions

  15. Methodological Considerations • Baseline • must be stable before treatment implemented • absence of trend or in the direction opposite of what is expected from the treatment • little variability • if variability in data, then track until stable or try to identify source of the instability • must also consider reactivity when tracking baseline data • Change only one variable at a time (Cardinal rule)

  16. Methodological Considerations • Length of phases • no set rule – semblance of stability • possibility of extraneous variables creeping in with long phases • carry-over effect may require short phases • cyclic variations – maybe need to incorporate the cycle in all phases

  17. Criteria for Evaluating Change • Experimental criterion • repeated demonstration of behavioral change should occur with treatment introduction • nonoverlap of treatment and baseline phases • Therapeutic criterion • clinical significance of a therapeutic or other psychological intervention for an individual or group of clients • researchers often use social validation – does it produce a change in the client’s daily functioning • social comparison – compare behavior with non-deviant peers • subject evaluation – do others who interact with the client see a change

More Related